3
Showing posts with label Code of ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Code of ethics. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Walgreens...Nosy staff Violate Consumer Privacy Rights! Managers gouge prices! Deceptive business practices!














I was taken aback when I strolled up to the Pharmacy counter at Walgreens at 3339 South Las Vegas Boulevard day-before-last and overheard the clerk quiz a customer about the cost of a prescription drug pursuant to the individuals insurance coverage.

After noting that the co-pay for the customer picking up the prescription was $3.30, the elderly employee proceeded to poke his nose into the patron's private medical affairs.

"Do you realize that this drug normally costs $1,000.00," he pointedly sniped at the customer (loud enough for all within earshot to hear) who struggled to maintain his composure.

Obviously, the middle-aged man was stunned by the intrusion judging by his negative reaction.

After all, what business was it of the pharmacist's?

Was the crotchety-old clerk jealous of the customer's excellent insurance coverage or was something more sinister afoot?

At this point, the individual stumbled for a response for a second or two.

"I know," he hesitated sincerely at long last, "I am quite lucky. I count my blessings every day," he managed to blurt out, a little emotional over the lack of code of ethics on the part of the ignorant Walgreens employee.

In my opinion, the conversation should never have taken place pursuant to applicable privacy laws.

The pharmacist should have simply checked the ID of the customer, processed the insurance, and collected the co-pay (with no questions asked).

In sum, the Walgreens employee breached a code of ethics and violated the customer's right to privacy in the process.

In fact, his shocking conduct rose to the level of negligence and invasion of privacy.

But, I am not surprised with what went down.

After all, Walgreens has a history of of "crossing the line".

For example, in the past the corporate giant has disclosed confidential private medical information about its customers to third parties without their permission or written consent.

The data was obtained from the prescription records on file which they gathered by virtue of drug sales at their pharmacies around the country.

Walgreens has also been previously slapped on the wrist by the Government for overcharging on sales items (i.e. computer scanners were not adjusted to reflect sales prices so consumers were charged the original ticket price unless they double-checked their bill and noticed the billing error).

The store's actions amounted to false advertising, deceptive business practices, and fraud.

The outlet at 3339 South Las Vegas Boulevard is also guilty of price gouging.

For instance, the items on the shelf are consistently priced at 10% - 20% higher than the products in other stores in the chain around Las Vegas. For example, a container of milk that sells on Fremont Street for $1.39 is sold for $1.99 at the Venetian Hotel location on the strip.

Management has deliberately manipulated the cost of inventory to dishonestly take advantage of the fact tourists lodged at hotels nearby are - not only use that store for convenience sake (distance factors) - also unaware that the items are less costly at Walgreens stores at other locations.

Because I shop at Walgreens stores in - Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Las Vegas - so I am quite familiar with their basic prices and keen to their dishonest business conduct as a result.

Talk about an "evil" Empire!

http://www.thetattler.biz





Friday, October 3, 2008

Los Angeles Times...quote of the day! Blogger screws up...



A controversy arose when a writer from a blog site (Blue Tidal Wave) submitted a story for consideration on Digg - which alleged that footage from a Katie Couric interview - was being "held back" to gain some advantage in the leverage game.

The writer, going by the moniker - The Saint - first lifted a quote from media critic Howard Kurtz, to jump-start his report.

"The worst may be yet to come for Palin. Sources say CBS has two more responses on tape that will likely prove embarrassing."

At this juncture, the Saint - less than Saintly judging by his scurrilous actions - proceeded to twist and distort the information to suit his own personal agenda.

According to the Times writer, David Sarno, the Saint took Kurtz's revelation and transformed it into an accusation of censorship replete with his own sounding board.

In short, here's what he posted.

"CBS evening news insiders say the censoring of the Palin interview was orchestrated by CBS news heads and Couric in an effort to show the McCain (!) campaign that they should choose the struggling nightly news program for their exclusive (!) interviews."

Well, for starters, there were enough red herrings in that little ditty to entice any super sleuth!


Sensing that Tidal Wave's tale of intrigue did not pass the smell test, either, the reporter at the daily followed up with a question or two of his own.

Ha! The Saint confessed.


The alleged CBS source was not that, at all.

The "insiders" fibber-boy was referring to - did not have any clout - and weren't heavyweights on the inside at CBS with privileged information, either.

"It was just a friend."

In addition, he admitted shame-faced the two only spoke "off-hand".

The icing on the cake?

"There never was any permission to cite a source."

When it comes right down to it, the Saint did not know if additional unused footage would be used at all, or if ever.

So, he put on his thinking cap, and dredged up the titillating accusation that the CBS camp was holding back footage with future strategies in mind.

It has since been determined that footage does exist; however, the wild scenario fathomed up by the Saint was nothing but a load of "hooey".

The truth of the matter is - Couric shot material separately for a "Questions" segment - which included a matching interview with Senator Joe Biden.

After chastising various individuals - and raising the issue of ethics in reporting - David Sarno uttered up what is undoubtedly the quote of the day.

"If there's one thing you learn from reporting on the Web, it's to be careful what you swallow."
 
coompax-digital magazine