Barack Obama...Protesters stalk President in San Francisco! Medical Marijuana demands!

 



One protester waved a placard with a cartoon-like image of Uncle Sam with "Liar" crudely scrawled on its face, the San Francisco Police Department scrambled to put up barriers between a mob that had gathered and a Presidential motorcade, and a Government helicopter circled overhead signalling that Barack Obama was on his way.

As protestors chanted slogans ("Safe Acess Now" & "DEA Go Away! ") frenzied newsmen from the major Networks jockeyed for position at the curb in a bold-faced effort to capture the rally as it unfolded on the street about fifty feet away from the entrance of the St. Regis Hotel where the President was expected any minute.

Motorists honked their horns in support as the rag-tag gang of citizens shouted out their slogans and angrily denounced President Obama for failing to honor a promise.

Shortly after Obama took office, he promised to end the persistent DEA para-military-style raids on pot dispensaries in California.

Readers at the Tattler may recall I posted a feature on the issue shortly after I received a press release from the White House.

Post: 10/19/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/medical-marijuanafederal-government.html

However, for some inexplicable reason, the President failed to follow through on his promise.

In spite of the fact the "Compassionate use of Medical Marijuana" was voted into law a few years ago, the DEA has continued to raid California pot dispensaries, at whim.

I previously attended protests at DEA headquarters and reported on the issues.

Post:  12/02/2010

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/02/marijuana-ballot-measure-to-legalize.html

Today, the President was undoubtedly aware of the greeting that awaited him at the St. Regis, judging by the show of force at the entrance of the Hotel, in the streets outside, and all-around a full city block.

In fact, when first strolled down the 3rd Street before the protest was underway, I stumbled on a couple of undercover cops whispering into walkie-talkies.

In one funny moment, a meter maid sped up to a parked car to issue a ticket - at which point - a gentleman darted out and informed her it was his vehicle and that he was with the Secret Service!
When the motorcade arrived, it was replete with a San Francisco Police Depatment escort, consisting of at least ten armed officers on motorcyles (with sirens sounding and lights flashing) and at least a dozen-or-so high-security vehicles (including a bomb squad!).

One reporter quizzed one of the protesters in jest.

"Do you think the President knows that you're here?  Do you think he cares?"

The spirited activist responded in the negative naturally.

It would have been a beautiful moment for the President - if he had only stopped by at the curb - and uttered up a few assurances.

Or, would the political mumble-jumble have amounted to more hollow promises? 

The same old same old!

For the protesters, it was a challenging day, to say the least.

A fierce wind blew down Market Street and icy temperatures chilled to the bone.

The Medical Marijuana activists drifted into a pre-arranged location at 3rd & Market Streets - where they worked out the details of their game plan - so the rally would be more impacting when it went down.

I thought it ironic that the starting point for the protest was in front of the  the AT & T building.

After all, the dedicated ativists wanted to reach out and touch at least one special person!

Needless to say, the brave upstarts got the cold shoulder from the President, and were kept at arm's length.

At one point, security spied a blue knapsack that appeared to be left unattended on the street.

Before pouncing on the mysterious bag, officers went through the crowds to determine if it belonged to any of the protesters, or a member of the press.

A few minutes later - when they were unable to determine who it belonged to - one officer (who had been quite respectful maintaining control of the protesters earlier) rifled through it to determine its contents.

The San Francisco Police Department should be commended for doing an exemplary job.

When I started towards an area where the protesters were forming, one officer quizzed me about my intentions, before letting me pass.

I pointed out that I was there to cover the protest, at which point, he noted that arrangements had been made to coral the activists at one location where they would be able to exercise their right to free speech.

Meanwhile, the blockade all around the hotel was causing a few headaches for commuters heading off to work.

Unfortunately, many were forced to detour around the Hotel to reach their destinations.

When they arrived late at the office, would their bosses believe their flimsy excuses?

A few tourists were literally confused!

But, all in all, it was a peaceful rally with good spirits all around.

Too bad the star of the event was a "no show" - in the street with the voting public - at least.

How will this impact his image - and his ratings in the polls - I wonder.

News at 11!

http://www.thetattler.biz/

 



Americans for Safe Access...DEA raids prompt training course for advocates of Medical Marijuana!

 

My contacts at - Americans For Safe Access (ASA) - excitedly informed me today that the non-profit organization (fighting for the rights of Medical Marijuana users sanctioned by California voters) are launching bringing a unique training program to the Los Angeles.

This classes are essential basic training for anyone serious about working professionally with patients in the medical cannabis field.

After taking the course successful candidates will attain:

• Increased competency in working with medical cannabis patients
• Intro to patients’ needs & bio-psycho-social health model
• Ability to identify behavioral & social side effects of illness
• Overviews of patient rights & responsibilities under applicable laws
• Practical skills to handle law enforcement encounters
• Excellent overviews of medical cannabis patient history

In view of the recent DEA Raids in Hollywood the past year or two, staff at ASA argue that the legal training being offered up now, is more important than ever.

I reported on the para-military-style raids at the Tattler.

Post: 02/01/2010

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/02/marijuana-ballot-measure-to-legalize.html

Post: 03/07/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/03/medical-marijuanafocus-on-doctors-not.html

Post: 10/19/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/medical-marijuanafederal-government.html

This ASA certified training is highly participatory, fast moving, and a lot of fun, according to the teachers.

A new section on "Treating the Whole Patient" also builds competency and awareness for students so they may better understand the unique challenges that patients face in daily living through a greater understanding of how physical, psychological, and emotional health conditions affect patient functioning.

SPEAKERS

Dr. Amanda Reiman
Working with Patient Population

Don Duncan
History Of Medical MJ

Lauren Payne, JD
Legal Training, Know Your Rights

DATE

April 9th (2011)
(Saturday)
9:30am - 4:30pm

Medical Cannabis Caregivers Directory
50 North Mentor Avenue
Pasadena, CA

CONTACT

Raudel Wilson
Community Liaison Director
Americans For Safe Access

raudel@safeaccessnow.org

See 'ya there!
 
http://www.thetattler.biz
 


Natural Medicine?

Medical Marijuana...Pot dispensaries go for the standard Neon storefront look! Government issue?

Medicinal Marijuna legal in California

Do you find it curious that a police car cruised by while I was shooting this?

http://www.julianayrs.com

Medical Marijuana...Charles Lynch sentencing held over til June!

Over the past year, I have been reporting on medical marijuana issues that have been bouncing around the State from the staid chambers of a half-a-dozen City Council Town Halls to the front steps of DEA headquarters in downtown Los Angeles.

On occasion, courts with jurisdiction over criminal proceedings arising from drug busts, have also been forced to grapple with the controversial subject of citizen-owned "pot dispensaries" and the subsequent distribution of medical marijuana pursuant to an initiative passed by California voters a scant few years ago.

Even President Barack Obama got into the fray recently when supporters of Medical Marijuana petitioned the oval office to recognize California State laws (and the will of the people) - and likewise - put an end to para-military-style raids on pot dispensaries by the DEA.

In the interim, Charles Lynch - an outspoken advocate of Medical Marijuana who ran a pot dispensary in Morro Bay - was busted by the DEA and charged with the crime of selling and distributing an illegal controlled substance pursuant to Federal law.

At the trial, which I covered, Lynch's counsel argued rigorously in his defense, to no avail.

The court was more inclined to rule in favor of the prosecutor who painted Mr. Lynch as a loose cannon who exalted his role as a supplier of medical marijuana, was prone to flash wads of cash to impress girls and impressionable locals - and likewise - allegedly acted irresponsibly by selling the "illegal controlled substance" to underage teens at whim.

Charles Lynch trial

Post: 10/02/08

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/10/free-charles-lynchprotest-rally-at.html


On the heels of his conviction, there was a public outcry from friends, supporters, and medical marijuana advocates who lamented to anyone within earshot that justice had not prevailed.

Subsequently, at the sentencing hearing yesterday afternoon, there was a big show of support.

It was noted for the record only one complaint had been filed against Lynch in the past.

When it was revealed that the disgruntled resident lodged it on the grounds that the product Lynch was selling was of poor quality, observers in the gallery were inclined to laugh out loud.

Bad business ethic, but surely not a crime in a State that voted in the legalization of medical marijuana, eh?

An "Americans for Safe Access" spokesperson, Don Duncan, described the hearing this way:

"The courtroom was filled to capacity for the proceedings - including extra federal marshals on hand to monitor the unusually large crowd. Observers listened to more than two hours of testimony from key players in the case. Owen Beck, the eighteen-year-old amputee and legal patient to whom Lynch provided cannabis, asked the judge for leniency in a heartfelt statement. The judge also heard from Lynch's brother and the Mayor and City Attorney from Morro Bay where Lynch operated Central Coast Compassionate Caregivers with the city's blessing until march of 2007."

The issue of whether or not Lynch believed his conduct was legal under state law will influence the decision of the Jurist presiding over the case (Judge Wu) when the matter concludes next month on June 11th (2009).

In court yesterday, Wu appeared to be leaning towards a lighter sentence rather than the applicable 5-year mandatory sentence prescribed by Federal law.

The Judge promised to review the precedent cited by a Joe Elford case and the guidelines for medical cannabis he helped to craft with the California Attorney General last year.

Stay tuned as this landmark case winds to a close in the near future.

http://www.julianayrs.com

Medical Marijuana...DEA should focus on Doctors not pot dispensaries!

In the spite of the fact the California Supreme Court issued a ruling that Proposition 215 (a voter-approved "compassionate use of Medical Marijuana" measure) stand, the DEA continued with para-military-style raids on local pot dispensaries.

The overzealous agents argued that marijuana was an illegal substance according to Federal law and that - consequently - the DEA could not look the other way.

In sum, the passing of Prop 215 in California, placed Federal and State Laws at odds with each other.

Notwithstanding, there was an outcry from Californians who felt that the "will of the people" was being ignored by self-serving law enforcement agencies.

Meanwhile, others lamented to all within earshot, that Barack Obama was not fulfilling his campaign promise regarding the issues.

So, Americans for Safe Access - a non-profit organization that has been fighting the medical marijuana dilemma in the State Courts (and winning hands-down) - organized a highly-vocal protest which was launched on the White House.

Shortly after Barack Obama and his administrators were bombarded with a barrage of telephone calls and angry e-mails - Eric Holder (Attorney General) - issued a terse statement to the press in which he noted that DEA raids on pot dispensaries (legally licensed in the State of California) were no longer condoned by the U.S. Government.

I penned a post on the turn of events.

Post: 03/02/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/03/medical-marijuanapara-military-style_02.html

A cheer went up around the state!

On the heels of that public announcement, inside sources alleged that a confidential memo was sent out to prosecutors advising them to "drop" charges against pot dispensaries and medical marijuana patients who were caught in the middle of the turf wars going down between the Federal Government and the State of California.

Suddenly, without warning, the bold action by the U.S. Attorney's office earlier in the week was reversed two days later amid a shroud of mystery.

Consequently, the whole prosecutorial issue regarding the matter was left twisting in the wind.

Some theorize that staff in the Obama inner circle advised the President that he may have jumped the gun in view of the fact the administration had not lined up all their ducks in a row, yet.

White House spokesperson , Nick Shapiro, may have hit the nail on the head when he recently confided to the press.

"The President believes that federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws, and as he continues to appoint senior leadership to fill out the ranks of the federal government, he expects them to review their policies with that in mind."

Curiously, a Professor of Law & Medicine focused on an issue that has been foremost in my own mind in recent days.

Alex Capron (USC) speculated that the debate about medical marijuana centers on whether it is something that is part of the doctor-patient relationship or something where the authorities have an obligation to protect the community from a dangerous drug.

I hate to be a stick in the mud, but I started to reflect on that aspect of the problem recently, after a stroll or two in the neighborhood in recent weeks.

On several occasions when I have passed by a couple of the pot dispensaries in West Hollywood (two on Santa Monica Boulevard in WeHo proper) I have spied cars careen to a halt outside the guarded front door - at which point - three or four young adults stumbled out into the busy street and headed into the facility to pick up their "medicine".

I know that I shouldn't prejudge - and that just glancing at a person's physical body is not a surefire way to verify if they have a medical problem that requires the potent powers of the leafy substance - but for the most part it appeared on each occasion I witnessed said events that the "patients" were energetic youths whose only need appeared to be to devour the drug.

Initially, if you recall, the whole idea of the compassionate use of medical marijuana sprang forth as an alternative to off-the-shelf prescription drugs when it was determined that A.I.D.S. patients in advanced stages of the disease benefited from the medicinal qualities of the banned substance.

Understandably, in view of the foregoing, I am concerned that because of a selfish few (who may be abusing the privilege to just get "high") medical marijuana and the distribution of the "medicine" at government-licensed dispensaries may be placed in jeopardy.

And, that would be a shame, since hard-working staff at Americans for Safe Access - in particular the lawyers - fought monumental battles in the courts on behalf of the worthy cause to ensure medical marijuana was available to needy patients.

Others, like myself, have not only written posts to rally support for the compassionate use of medical marijuana, but also attended protests in front of DEA Headquarters to demand an end to the para-military-style raids, drug and money seizures, and dehumanizing arrest procedures.

In the final analysis, it appears that the problems may have arisen because of unethical doctors who may be approving medical marijuana prescriptions willy-nilly to appease their patients (or for quick cash under the table).

Personally, I believe that at this juncture of the "game", the government (and the DEA) should focus their attention on the doctors.

If an investigation determines there has been wrongdoing by individuals in the medical profession, then perhaps the State needs an oversight Board to properly review requests for medical marijuana prescriptions before rubber-stamping approval.

Sorry, Dudes!

http://www.julianayrs.com

DMV...medical marijuana patients exempt from license revocation!

When a California driver's license was revoked because she used marijuana for medicinal purposes, Americans for Safe Access sprang into action to rectify the wrong by filing a lawsuit against the DMV.

After all, pursuant to Proposition 215, the compassionate use of medical marijuana was approved by voters in the State of California.

Shortly after the litigation commenced, the DMV restored the woman's license, but dug in their heels when it came to admitting wrongdoing.

In fact, the DMV went one step further.

In a training manual, agency employees instructed to treat medical marijuana like any other prescription drug.

In view of the pending lawsuit, perhaps?

When queried about that stickling point, a spokesman for the DMV brushed off any suggestion of deceitful conduct, and sworn up and down that the licensing bureau never had a policy to remove driving privileges from medical marijuana patients.

The changes in the manual were part of a planned update, they asserted.

Gotcha!

Joe Alford, Chief Counsel of Americans for Safe Access, was pleased with the outcome.

"Drivers will no longer have their licenses suspended or revoked simply because of their status as medical marijuana patients."

http://www.julianayrs.com

Medical Marijuana...para-military-style raids by DEA "Not American Policy" says U.S. Attorney General!

At long last, the new Democrats in the Oval Office are getting up to speed on the DEA raids issue.



Thick-headed agents at the Law Enforcement Agency have been flies in the ointment for the past six months or so - in spite of the fact Court Rulings in favor of the compassionate use of Medical Marijuana in the State of California - have gone forward in leaps and bounds.



Although all legal challenges on court calendars around the State were resolved - after all, the last ruling handed down by the California Supreme Court set a precedent which dictates that the compassionate use of Medical Marijuana is now legal in California - the DEA continued to terrorize pot dispensaries - and likewise - harass medical marijuana patients in violation of the State Law.



An aggressive campaign to inform the President about the heinous acts of the DEA - and a bold-faced attempt by supporters of Medical Marijuana to urge Barack Obama to take a stand publicly regarding the illegal para-military-style DEA raids in recent weeks - finally paid off.



At a press conference last week, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters that it is now American policy not to intefere with State medical cannabis laws or allow any DEA raids on dispensaries spearheaded by overjealous agents.



Americans for Safe Access, a non-profit organization that has been tirelessly working on behalf of the legal rights of medical marijuana patients in recent years, was one of the leading organizations in the country pushing for an end to this interference.



In the final analysis - telephone calls to the White House and heartfelt letters to the President - garnered the positive outcome which unfolded last week in Washington, D.C.



Seventy-two million Americans live in states where medical cannabis is legal, but federal law prohibits its use under any circumstances.



And, more than 100 Americans are currently facing prosecution, sentencing, or serving time in prison for medical cannabis offenses right now, according to ASA spokesperson George Pappas.



ASA hopes the emerging change in federal policy will signal an end to prosecutions and bring those already serving time for medical cannabis offenses home to their families.



"There has been a lot of collateral damage in the federal campaign against medical marijuana patients," said Steph Sherer, Executive Director of Americans for Safe Access.

"We need to stop the prosecutions, bring the prisoners home, and begin working to eliminate the conflict between state and federal medical marijuana laws."



ASA provided recommendations for a new national medical cannabis policy to President Obama and the 111th Congress earlier this year.



The staff at ASA pray that because a U.S. President was willing to listen to science and take seriously the suffering of medical marijuana patients, that on the heels of the announcement by Holder, that there will now be an increase in state level action around the country.

Amen!

Ailments alleviated by Medical Marijuana

http://www.julianayrs.com

Medical Marijuana...U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear case! Victory for patients...

I have reported on the ongoing battle in the courts in the matter of a medical marijuana case - Garden Grove vs. Superior Court - which eventually weedled (no pun intended) its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Yesterday, the high court of the land refused to review a landmark decision, wherein California State Courts found that the medical marijuana law was not preempted by Federal Law as previously argued.

Initially, the lower court Justices in the Appellate court issued an "Opinion" on November 28, 2007, that specifically underscored the grounds for their historic ruling.

"It is not the job of the local police to enforce the federal drug laws."

The case arose from an incident in June of 2005 when police charged resident Felix Kha with possession of marijuana (in spite of the fact papers in his possession verified he was a medical marijuana patient entitled to legally use the controlled substance) and proceeded to confiscate Kha's medicine in what was later to be determined as a wrongful seizure.

Medical marijuana advocates who have been vigorously fighting this case in the courts for the past three years, praised the Supreme Court for rendering what they deemed a just decision.

In sum, legal scholars have hailed the ruling as significant because it has underscored law enforcement's obligation to uphold state law.

On the heels of the conclusion of the exhaustive legal wrangling, advocates have theorized that there will now be stricter adherence to state medical marijuana laws by local police - the end result being - that there won't be as many arrests or illegal seizures.

"It's now settled that state law enforcement officers cannot arrest medical marijuana patients or seize their medicine simply because they prefer the contrary federal law," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the medical marijuana advocacy organization that represented defendant Felix Kha.

"Perhaps, in the future local government will think twice about expending significant time and resources to defy a law that is overwhelmingly supported by the people of our state."

Don't Bogart that joint, Arnold!

California Supreme Court...denies County of San Diego's Medical Marijuana appeal. Senate Bill 420 binding State Law!

Today, the California Supreme Court denied an appeal lodged by the County of San Diego - and in the process - signaled to lawmakers that - "Federal Law does not trump State Law."

The County of San Diego filed suit in February 2006 - after challenging the validity of California’s medical cannabis laws - and refusing to issue patient ID cards for Medical Marijuana patients which are mandated under Senate Bill 420 (2003).

Shortly thereafter, a Superior Court Judge dismissed the action, which was a sound victory for Americans For Safe Access - who intervened - and became a party to the action to protect the rights of Medical Marijuana patients in the State of California.

On the heels of Superior Court ruling, however, County legal eagles remained undaunted.

An appeal was lodged with the State Appellate Court - in a bold-faced legal effort to circumvent State Laws - and ultimately deny all Medical Marijuana patients the rights they were afforded pursuant to Senate Bill 420.

The Appellate Court Justices reviewed the issues and found that the lower Superior Court ruling was without error.

Subsequently, San Diego County lost that round of litigation in the higher court.

Unwilling to accept defeat, even at that juncture, attorneys were inclined to go one step further and lodge another appeal with the California Supreme Court for further consideration.

Today, the Supreme Court denied the request to hear the appeal.

In sum, the litigation is now over.

All counties in the state are now compelled to abide by applicable Statutes in respect to provisions mandated by law and as they pertain to the "compassionate use of Medical Marijuana".

On the heels of the landmark ruling, Joe Elford - a representative at Americans for Safe Access - noted that Counties that do not comply with the Court's ruling today will face vigorous opposition.

“We are prepared to commence litigation to ensure implementation of the medical marijuana ID card program,” he asserted.

The implications of the San Diego victory are far-reaching.

Until now, elected officials at various levels of government, have cited Federal law as a reason not to obey the will of California voters.

And, officials across the country - who have been looking at the implementation of medical marijuana statutes in their own states - have held back because they have been under the impression that federal law trumps state action.

The landmark ruling today paves the road ahead.

For those who seek (or already carry) Medical Marijuana ID cards - and purchase medical marijuana from licensed collectives - the ruling is a glorious victory.

One of many protests held over abusive DEA raids...

(Free) Charles Lynch...protest rally at Federal Courthouse. October 6th. 11 A.M.

A posse of protesters are planning a rally down at the Federal Courthouse on Monday, October 6th, to protest the recent conviction of medical marijuana distributor, Charles Lynch.

On August 4, 2008, the jury in the Charles C. Lynch Federal Court case began their deliberations after arduous closing arguments, numerous jury instructions and a taxing two-week trial

Mr. Lynch was found guilty of conspiracy to possess and distribute marijuana, two counts of providing cannabis to adults under the age of 21 years old, possession with intent to distribute and maintaining a drug premises

To some, Mr. Lynch has being unjustly charged with crimes that fly in the face of current State Law.

In his defense, a few have argued that Mr. Lynch followed all his business license requirements, city regulations, county restrictions, and state law.

Notwithstanding, Mr. Lynch's counsel asserted in court that his client contacted the DEA before setting up shop, to determine if his plans fell within the confines of Federal law.

Mr. Lynch alleged that the DEA representative he spoke to waved him off.

"It’s up to cities and counties to handle that [medical marijuana dispensary] matter."

I personally recall reading an article in the morning daily - after-the-fact - that reported the DEA official in question adamantly denied the comments were ever uttered to the defendant, Mr. Lynch.

In fact, if I recall correctly, the DEA Agent insisted that no one at that office would ever make such a wild statement, in view of their vigorous attempts to shut down pot dispensaries in recent months.

It should be noted that in another case this week, a Federal Judge refused to impose prison time on a man who had produced and distributed edible medical cannabis products throughout the state of California.

Despite sentencing guidelines calling for at least two-and-a-half years in jail, U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilkin exercised her discretion to sentence Michael Martin, 34, to five years probation, with one year to be served in a halfway house and one year to be served in home confinement.


The dramatic sentence caused the courtroom full of patients and activists to erupt in applause.

However, it should be noted that Mr. Martin did agree to a plea bargain, in view of the fact a stiff sentence appeared to be on the horizon, otherwise.

Faced with the threat of more serious charges and the specter of a Federal Trial in which no information about State Law or medical use could be introduced, Martin pled guilty in Federal Court to manufacturing marijuana edibles and did not contest the government finding of more than four hundred plants seized in a DEA raid in September (2007).

In a speech to the court that had observers in tears, Martin spoke eloquently about why he had acted on behalf of patients, describing the cancer patients he was proud to have helped, the support of his loving family, and how he had only acted on behalf of others, never for profit.

That speech, the enormous volume of letters of support for Martin the judge received, and the lack of any evidence that any edible produced by Mickey was diverted to recreational use, all helped the judge declare that this was a unique case that did not call for a normal sentence, and certainly not the more than three years of federal prison that the law mandates.

Comments from the bench about the tensions between State and Federal laws also made clear that the Judge understood medical cannabis cases to be different from other federal drug cases, and she joined several other members of the federal judiciary in departing from the government's sentencing guidelines.

"The prosecution of good people like Michael Martin, who are trying to give patients the choice of an edible, non-smoked medicine, is a travesty," said Rebecca Saltzman, ASA Chief of Staff.

"The government says smoking is a bad delivery method then prosecutes those who provide an alternative - ridiculous."

The Lynch case differed in some respects.

Although it was argued in court by the defense counsel that Mr. Lynch obtained his license for the dispensary like any law-abiding citizen would - and thereafter acted within the full dictates of the law - the prosecutor and the DEA Agents accused that Mr. Lynch exploited his role as a legal dispensary, sold medical marijuana willy-nilly to underage youths - and quite flagrantly - played up his role as a supplier in a manner that was careless, in question, and not in keeping with State Laws.

Of course, that is a quick sketch of arguments I gleaned in the local press.

I have not researched the issues thoroughly, so I can not take a position one way or the other, in this instant case.

Supporters familiar with the case, on the other hand, have been quite vocal.

Although allegations of wrongdoing were made, the Lynch camp is quite adamant that no evidence was presented in federal court that substantiated the bald-faced allegations.

A representative at Americans for Safe Access - Don Duncan - was inclined to protest the outcome, too.

"Terrible justice. We must protest his sentencing."

Hence, the rally, which is being scheduled for October 6th at the Federal Court House, at 312 N. Spring Street (at Temple) in downtown Los Angeles at 11:00 A.M.

See 'ya there!

Arnold, who's your supplier?

Medical Marijuana...Attorney General Brown releases guidelines to Law Enforcement!

Today, Jerry Brown - the Attorney General for the State of California - released guidelines that direct law enforcement on how to approach encounters with medical cannabis patients and that explicitly acknowledge that "a properly organized and operated collective or cooperative that dispenses medical marijuana through a storefront may be lawful pursuant to existing California Law."

These guidelines are a direct result of a cooperative effort between representatives and volunteers at "Americans for Safe Access" and the Attorney General's office.

In fact, according to my sources, the Attorney General's office approached ASA staff and volunteers for cooperation and assistance in drafting the guidelines.

As a result, there has been a fruitful outcome that represents a milestone in the legal acceptance of California's medical cannabis laws by State Officials and Law Enforcement.

In essence, the Attorney General’s guidelines represent a major turning point for the state of California.

Attorney General Brown - the highest-ranking law enforcement officer in California - has not only pledged his support, but joined voters, lawmakers, and the courts in reaffirming the validity of the State Law regarding medical marijuana use.

The guidelines provide a long-awaited directive for patients and police - as well as for lawyers, judges and public officials - so that everyone concerned can better understand the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of "all" under State Law.

In sum, the guidelines firmly establish that as long as patients and caregivers are abiding by local and state laws, they should not be arrested and their medicine should not be confiscated.

Bottom line, the State Attorney General's office has reaffirmed that California's Medical Marijuana Law is not preempted by Federal Law.

Accordingly, the Attorney General shall direct all,

"State and local law enforcement officers [to] not arrest individuals or seize marijuana under Federal Law when an individual's conduct is legal under said state law," informed sources disclosed.

These guidelines did not come without a fight though, and represents five years of hard-fought battles around the State with various levels of government, Law Enforcement, and the citizenry itself.

For a review of the guidelines:

www.americansforsafeaccess.org

Medical Marijuana...Senate passes AB 2279.

Just a few moments ago, I received word from Don Duncan at the headquarters of Americans for Safe Access that the California Senate approved ASA’s bill (AB 2279) to protect medical cannabis patients from discrimination in the workplace.

There was a groundswell of grassroots support from thousands of ASA members and concerned residents of California once the issue made news around the State.

In addition - three labor unions representing nearly one million workers in California - backed the important initiative, too.

The win constitutes a great victory in the defense and expansion of the rights of medical cannabis patients.

AB 2279 is now on its way to the Governor’s desk.

Assembly member - Mark Leno - introduced AB 2279 after the California Supreme Court ruled that workers could be fired simply because of their status as medical cannabis patients.

Since AB 2279 was first presentated to the Senate, reps at ASA have worked tirelessly to muster up support for the well-crafted bill.

Senate Majority Leader - Gloria Romero - brought AB 2279 to the Senate floor earlier this afternoon and it was summarily passed.

Info: www.AmericansForSafeAccess.org/AB2279.

Medical Marijuana...Appellate Court rules in favor of State "compassionate use" Law!

The Fourth District Court of Appeal for the State of California issued a published opinion on the heels of a ruling this past week stating that federal law does not preempt the state's medical marijuana law.

The County of San Diego filed a suit against the State of California in February (2006) which challenged the validity of the State identification card program as well as the foundation of California's medical marijuana laws.

In the final scenario, both lower and appellate courts found that the ID card program and State Law remained valid and do not violate the State Constitution.

"This is a huge win for medical marijuana patients, not only in California, but across the country," said Joe Elford (Chief Counsel for ASA) who argued before the appellate court on behalf of medical marijuana patients.

"This ruling makes clear the ability of states to pass medical marijuana laws with an expectation that those laws will be upheld by local and state, if not federal, officials."

Justice Alex McDonald wrote the "Opinion" - which was supported unanimously - by all the Jurists on the bench.

The court ruled that the Federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) "signifies Congress's intent to maintain the power of states to elect - 'to serve as a laboratory in the trial of novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country' - by preserving all State laws that do not positively conflict with the CSA.

Americans for Safe Access (ASA) defended the interests of patients in the appeal and filed briefs along with the ACLU Drug Law Reform Project. Both organizations successfully intervened as defendants in the lawsuit in August (2006) while the case was still being litigated in the Superior Court.

ASA intends to launch an educational campaign soon that will apprise elected officials across the state of their obligation to implement state law, in particular the state ID card program, which both assists law enforcement and bestows greater protection for patients.

San Diego County was originally joined by San Bernardino and Merced Counties - but later Merced chose not to appeal - opting instead to implement the state ID card program and a Sheriff's policy on medical marijuana patient encounters.

Against the wishes of the San Diego City Council, the County of San Diego filed an appeal in February (2007) along with San Bernardino County.

The City of San Diego voiced its disapproval of the legal action by filing an amicus - "friend of the court brief" - siding with the Attorney General and medical marijuana patient advocates.

"More than eleven years after the passage of Proposition 215, it's about time that we all got on the same page with regard to medical marijuana and the protections afforded by California law," Elford lamented.

"With two Appellate Court decisions clearly stating that Federal Law should not be an excuse to avoid enforcing State Law, it is now time for full implementation in California."

Obviously, the courts are getting the message loud and clear, too.

In the recent past, the California Supreme Court denied a review of another appeal - "City of Garden Grove v. Superior Court" - in a case where the lower court found the State's medical marijuana law was not preempted by federal law.

Malibu...rejects ordinance ban on pot dispensaries!

Yesterday, I reported that the Malibu Planning Commission was slated to hear arguments for a strict ban on outlets for "Medical Marijuana" dispensaries within the city limits.

On the heels of the announcement, a number of activists in support of medical marijuana and its compassionate use in the State of California, organized a rally and appeared before the Commission to plea for leniency.

I was unable to attend the meeting yesterday afternoon, but a representative for "Americans for Safe Access" - Don Duncan - did appear and was thrilled to inform me bright and early this morning that the planners roundly rejected the proposed ordinance to ban pot dispensaries in the region.

At that hearing, Mr. Duncan - and others - urged council to reject the bid for a ban - and in the alternative - follow the lead of other cities and counties around the state (including Los Angeles County) - by adopting sensible regulations for the provision of medical cannabis distribution.

By doing so, the well-organized activists noted that the Commission would be fulfilling an explicit mandate of the voters (by virtue of Proposition 215) to provide a mechanism for safe and affordable access to medicine for all who need it.

Medical cannabis dispensing collectives are a community-based solution that satisfy the need for safe access to medicine. Most of California’s legal medical cannabis patients rely on the dispensaries for safe access to doctor-approved marijuana which treats the symptoms of AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, and other serious life-threatening illnesses.

After considerable discussion, the Malibu Planning Commission rejected the recommendation by city staff to ban medical cannabis collectives outright, and asked staff to return with a proposal to regulate facilities in the city at a later date.

At the hearing on Tuesday - the Commissioners heard from patients, a doctor, and attorneys for PCH Collective (one of two collectives operating in Malibu under the terms of the city's two-year-old moratorium).

In support of his arguments, the attorney for PCH Collective submitted a petition with almost four hundred signatures calling for regulations instead of a ban, which obviously mustered up some sympathy.

But, the Commission also thoroughly reviewed the issues.

Mr. Duncan informed me that several of the commissioners questioned him about regulations in other cities, conflicts with federal law, sales tax, and other pertinent details.

In spite of the fact the dispensary issue has been hotly debated in California in recent weeks in the wake of DEA raids, no one in attendance from the public, according to Duncan, was in favor of the ban.

Unfortunately, one of Commissioners suffered a negative experience in recent days which was openly discussed at the hearing.

In her testimony, she alleged that she and her family were shopping in an establishment in Malibu one day when they became overcome by cannabis smoke leaking through the walls from a dispensary adjacent.

In support of her claims, staff from the establishment she was patronizing, noted for the record that the "pot dispensary" (which only accepted cash) was frequented by young people.

Although they complained to the Sheriff's department about the problem, allegedly no action was taken.

Unfortunately, owners of the collective did not appear at the hearing to defend themselves against any of the allegations.

The Commissioners debated the issues at length and then settled on a motion calling for strict regulations based on an ordinance recently adopted in another city which appeared to be reasonable under the circumstances.

After debating the need to prevent a proliferation of collectives while preserving competition to keep prices in check, the Commissioners agreed to allow three collectives to operate in Malibu.

It is unclear how quickly staff will return a recommendation for an appropriate ordinance, but the city's moratorium expires on June 25.

The Commissioners, the members of PCH Collective and its owner, Mr. Duncan, and all the supporters who showed up to fight the good cause are to be commended for making a strong professional showing at the hearing which garnered positive results.

Community activism can make a difference!

"A person's true wealth is the good he or she does in the world"
Muhammad

DEA raids. House Judiciary Committee to probe paramilitary-style abuses, rights violations!

Through my sources I managed to secure a copy of a damning letter John Conyers - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee - has sent on to the Acting Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) requesting information on widespread raids which have gone down in the Los Angeles area since last fall.

The DEA has been targeting "pot" dispensaries that have been providing medicinal marijuana to California residents legally entitled to use the leafy product under current law in the State.

At issue, are shocking enforcement raids in which DEA Agents were prone to defiantly engage in abusive conduct - and on many occasions - act in direct Violation of individual rights.

In spite of the fact California voters approved a measure to allow the compassionate use of cannabis for medicinal purposes several years ago by ballot, the DEA responded by accusing the suppliers of being engaged in an "...illegal sale of an illicit drug which is outlawed by the Federal Government."

Although local officials (West Hollywood City Council & Los Angeles Board of Supervisors) held emergency meetings with local law enforcement to try to stave off future arrests until the conflicts in State & Federal Statutes could be resolved - bottom line - the FEDS ignored the good-faith attentions of the many to actively pursue the matter in a cavalier abusive manner.

Over the past few months, I not only reported on the outrageous DEA tactics, but also attended a handful of the spirited rallies in front of Governor Schwarzenegger's downtown office in Los Angeles and the DEA headquarters on Temple Street, respectively.

The protests fell on deaf ears.

Posts:
Pot Post (9/13/07)
Rally (10/10/07)
DEA Raids (10/12/07)
DEA Protest (3/24/07)

Consequently, thousands of complaints from U.S. Citizens - and grass-roots organizers and attorneys at Americans for Safe Access - have resulted in the launching of an investigation by Chairman John Conyers at the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C.

In his letter to Acting DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart, Mr. Conyers starts off by stating as follows,

"I am writing to you because I have received a number of letters from Californians, including mayors and city councils, expressing concern about DEA enforcement tactics which urge me to hold oversight hearings in the Judiciary Committee."

Mr. Conyers goes on to characterize the actions of the DEA as follows,

"According to the letters, the DEA has dramatically intensified the frequency of paramilitary-style enforcement raids against individuals qualified to use medical cannabis under state law, their caregivers, and the dispensing collectives established to provide a safe place to access medical cannabis."

He goes on to note that he is aware that the DEA sent out "hundreds of letters to property owners who lease property to medical cannabis dispensaries, threatening them with arrest, and forfeiture of property."

At this juncture, Mr. Conyers made a surprising overture to the Acting DEA head, with the specific aim of determining the facts from the horse's mouth - so-to-speak - prior to the commencement of the formal investigation.

In his communication, Conyers has asked that Michele Leonhart answer the following queries:

Question No. 1:

Is the use of civil asset forfeiture, which has been typically reserved for the worst drug traffickers and kingpins, an appropriate tactic to employ against individuals who suffer from severe or chronic illness and are authorized to use medical marijuana under California Law?

Has the DEA conducted any analysis of the potential economic consequences of using civil asset forfeiture in an area that is experiencing some of the Nation's sharpest declines in property values?

Lastly, has the DEA considered the consequences of shutting down legally-operated public dispensaries and whether that might drive the cannabis sales activity underground?

Question No. 2

Given the increased level of trafficking and violence associated with international drug cartels across Mexico, South America, and elsewhere, do you think the DEA's limited resources are best utilized conducting enforcement raids on individuals and their caregivers who are conducting themselves legally under California Law?

Question No. 3

Have you considered that DEA activities against qualified individuals is negatively impacting the ability of state and local officials across California to collect tax revenue which they are entitled to under California Law?

Question No. 4

Every month new science supporting the therapeutic value of cannabis is published. As a result, medical and scientific organizations, like the American College of Physicians and the American Psychiatric Association, are arguing reform of the laws that place in legal jeopardy physicians or their individual patients who may benefit from the use of cannabis.

As the Administrator, you have the discretion to decide whether to continue heightened enforcement activities in California and in other states that have authorized use of medical cannabis by qualified individuals.

Please explain what role, if any, emerging scientific data plays in your decision-making process to conduct enforcement raids on individuals authorized to use or provide medical cannabis under state law.

Question No. 5

Would you support the creation of an inter-governmental commission comprised of law enforcement, law makers and people affected by the laws, to review policy and provide recommendations that aim to bring harmony to federal and state laws?

In closing, Mr. Conyers included a list of approximately sixty raids that the DEA conducted between June 2005 and November 2007.

In reference to those raids, Mr. Conyers has asked that the DEA provide an accounting of costs, in dollars and resources, used to conduct the law enforcement raids on said individuals.

Included in the package of information, Mr. Conyers has asked: whether arrests were made in the course of the raids, and if so, how many people were arrested; under what circumstances the warrants were issued; and for what content, whether criminal or other charges have been brought by the DOJ; what, if any, content was seized or destroyed; and finally, the current status of each case.

A response has been requested prior to a deadline date set for July 1, 2008.

As usual, the DEA has "no comment", pursuant to their ongoing policy not to speak with the media regarding such matters.

http://www.julianayrs.com

Los Angeles City Council...votes yes on Joint Resolution SJR 20; Signals compassion for Medical Marijuana users!

Last week, I reported that the LA City Council was slated to vote on SJR 20, in the wake of raids on local pot dispensaries and allegations of abusive conduct by the DEA.

Post: 03/31/08

On Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008, City Council voted 9-1 to approve state Senator Carole Migden's Senate Joint Resolution SJR 20 which was introduced by Council members Dennis Zine, Janice Hahn, and Bill Rosendahl.

Councilman Greig Smith was a lone dissenter, who I understand from informed sources, is under fire for his reluctance to "get on board".

In a nutshell, SJR 20 establishes a call for the President and Congress of the United States to enact legislation requiring federal law enforcement to respect state medical marijuana laws, to cease raids of medical marijuana dispensaries that are operating legally under California and local law, and to return any assets seized from medical marijuana dispensaries and collectives to the states in which they are located.

And, SJR 20 urges that Congress and the President take notice that Californians are best equipped to deal with the implementation of their state medical marijuana law.

By taking the action they have, the Los Angeles City Council is now standing up for patients’ right to legal access to medical marijuana.

The LA City Council's vote follows recent actions from Mayors from Oakland, Santa Cruz and West who Hollywood have sent letters to House Judiciary Chair John Conyers (D-MI) calling for Congressional hearings on the matter. Several other local governments have joined Los Angeles in condemning federal interference, including San Francisco, Oakland, and Berkeley.

Approval of SJR 20 signals a growing statewide trend to oppose federal intimidation and DEA interference with California State Legislative Laws.

According to last reports, there are 183 registered dispensaries in the city of Los Angeles and an estimated 250,000 Californians use medical marijuana to relieve aliments associated with AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis and other chronic conditions.

"This is not about getting high. This is not about drug dealing on the street corners. This is about the Compassionate Use Act," said Zine, who has spent almost 40 years with the Los Angeles Police Department.

California voters approved Proposition 215 in 1996, which legalized the use of marijuana by patients with a doctor's prescription. The federal government bars cannabis use of any kind.

Virgil Grant - who suffered abuse by DEA agents when his dispensary was recently raided - noted for the record,

"I'm a holistic person who likes to take non-drugs. I don't like taking synthetic drugs. I live the all-natural life, so medical marijuana provides that for me without the side effects (of) Vicodin, other things," Grant said.

When the DEA was asked to state their position regarding City Council's precedent-setting action on SJR 20, a spokeswoman for the DEA noted the federal agency does not comment on policy issues.

DEA protest...Americans for Safe Access to picket the Federal Building! Pot Busts must end!

Don Duncan, a rep for Americans For Safe Access, contacted me today to advise me that medical cannabis advocates will be meeting in front of the DEA offices at the Federal Building tomorrow to protest last week’s raids at six medical cannabis collectives and one private residence in the Los Angeles area.

Volunteers are downloading a flyer available online at the ASA website to distribute at the rally on  March 25th, 2008.

To make the protest effective, ASA notes that they need a strong showing to be sure that the DEA and media hear the message:

“Stop taking our medicine!”

Last fall, I attended one of their rallies in front of the Governor's downtown headquarters and reported on the DEA's abusive retaliatory conduct in the wake of the protest, and their ongoing concerted efforts to deny Medical Marijuana to patients in need of their medicine.

 In spite of the fact California voters approved a measure to allow compassionate use of cannabis for medicinal purposes (California Proposition 215) the DEA has been cracking down on the local suppliers, alleging that their outlets are engaging in conduct which amounts to,

"The illegal sale of an illicit drug outlawed by the Federal Government."

Although local officials (West Hollywood City Council and the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors) held emergency meetings with local law enforcement in the past to try to stave off future arrests until the conflicts in State and Federal Statutes could be resolved - bottom line - the FEDS noted their intention to pursue the matter to the full extent of the Law. And, they have been.

Now, Americans for Safe Access, intend to protest directly to DEA Officials.

According to ASA:

"Over the past several years, President Bush's Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has victimized patients and providers throughout California, undermining State Law, and stooping to new levels to shut down access for sick and dying patients in California."

In view of this, Americans for Safe Access have launched a pressure campaign, with the aim of putting the spotlight on the DEA and Schwarzenegger, so that appropriate action will follow to preserve patients' rights.

According to ASA, Governor Schwarzenegger can accomplish a lot by taking constructive action on the part of medical cannabis patients and caregivers now, and by giving a nod to the will of the voters in California at the same time, by standing up to the Bush Administration and the DEA.

In sum, ASA is urging the Governor to take a stand against Federal medical cannabis Law Enforcement efforts, and in the process, work at harmonizing Federal law with the compassionate laws of California and eleven other states that allow medical cannabis use.

In addition to previous campaign activities - which consisted of statewide call-in days, legislative visits from constituents and lobbyists, and sign-on letters from key public officials and organizations - the ASA now plans to stand defiantly against the DEA in the front lines on their home turf.

The campaign, building momentum in recent days (and after the recent raids on dispensaries in the San Francisco Bay area when I was up there a few weeks ago) will be successful if concerned citizens take action now - by drafting letters voicing their concerns, sending e-mails stressing the urgency of the situation, or by appearing on the rally day in person to let their voices be heard in uproarious union!

The bold-faced effort is expected to climax at a mass mobilization effort tomorrow - Tuesday, March 25th (11 am) - in front of the DEA offices:

Federal Building, 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles.

Map:

http://www.ASAaction.org

Additional info:

Sonnet@AmericansforSafeAccess.org

 Citizens unable to attend the protest are urged to initiate protests to the DEA directly, and also call Governor Schwarzenegger's office and demand that he take a stand on behalf of California citizens, with the aim of protecting their rights and putting an end to the DEA raids sanctioned against patients and providers.

The Governor may be reached in Sacramento at: 916-445-2841

In addition, an e-mail campaign designed to pressure the Governor, has also been underway in recent weeks which Californians can take an active part in.

Concerned citizens are urged to send e-mails to the Governor to demand that he ask George W. Bush to recognize California Laws as they pertain to the compassionate use of marijuana, and subsequently, end the "war on patients".

Citizens may use the ASA online action center to e-mail a form letter.

http://www.safeaccessnow.org

See you at the rally, tomorrow!

http://www.thetattler.biz



The Big Lebowski...fans storm theatre, time for a sequel?

When "The Big Lebowski" screened at the "Insomniac Cinema" not too long ago, there was a big turn out at the midnight show in West Hollywood.

Frankly, I don't recall encountering such a boisterous rambunctious crowd of filmgoers descending on a movie house with such fan frenzy, in recent days.

"The Big Lebowski" topped the "Rocky Horror Show" - for all-out enthusiasm - in my estimation.

In fact, at one point, the over-anxious crowd of young hipsters stormed the Theatre.

Yeah, when the usher's back was turned - off refilling the popcorn machine, I guess - the gang of merry pranksters surged forward in a bold-faced effort to snap up the best seats in the house.

What rollicking fun - in spite of the fact I was nearly trampled in the long cramped hallway - on the way to Theatre No. 2.

Of course, "The Big Lebowski" is a Coen Brothers' offering!

The hilarious comedy is the off-beat tale about a laid back, down-and-out guy, who goes by the moniker of "Dude"

His pals are a motley crew keen on bowling - so much so - they're in a bona fide rag-tag league.

On the heels of a case of mistaken identity, the Dudereno (Jeff Bridges) gets mixed up in an intriguing scenario with a millionaire's wife, a subsequent kidnapping, and a gang of wacko characters who spill out of the woodwork and pound on him without warning.

There's a whole posse of zany characters in this movie - a gang of loser nihilists, a high-brow conceptual artist and her hired hands, and some white-trash thugs a little slow on the uptake.

The one-liners are real zingers; in fact, the best COEN gems to come down the pike in a long time.

In fact, they're so choice and so memorable, that the filmgoers (who've obviously caught an infectious bug of some kind which compels them to take in each and every screening when it rolls around) are inclined to scream out the dialogue verbatim with wicked glee.

Dude, there appears to be a cult following for "The Big Lebowski".

In fact, the film has spawned a book, with a forward by Jeff Bridges.

The hefty tome is rife with trivia, interviews with fellow achievers (Patton Oswalt, Tony Hawk, Powerpuff Girls creator Craig McCracken), tips on Dude-ifying your life, a Little Larry flipbook, a guide to the film's locations, Lebowski Fest Highlights, and a lot of what-have-you.

And - did you know? - there's a "Big Lebowski" Film Festival on schedule every year.

Check out the dudes below in Louisville, KY, at their annual event.

Dudelicious!

As I sat there in the theatre, I wondered.

Why hasn't there been a sequel?

At the end of the film, when the mysterious cowboy noted there was a little Lebowski in the oven, it hit me like a bolt of lightning.

How about a sequel featuring the "young dude"?

For continuity's sake - how about a plot line centering around the cultivation of Medical Marijuana - or something topical like that?

There are endless ingenious scenarios to consider.

Are the COEN brothers up to it?

Heck, I just might be inclined to throw a script together, myself!

After all, late-night midnight shows and doobie-laced Film Fests appeal to me.

And, I just love muscle cars and bowlin' on Friday Nights.

Later, Dude!

http://www.julianayrs.com

Medical Marijuana...rally, October 11th; Los Angeles

Recently, I reported about the raids by FEDS on local Medical Marijuana suppliers. (Boys Town Pot Busts)

In spite of the fact California voters approved a measure to allow compassionate use of cannabis for medicinal purposes, the DEA has been cracking down on the local suppliers, alleging that their outlets are engaging in conduct which amounts to the "...illegal sale of an illicit drug which is outlawed by the Federal Government."

Although local officials (West Hollywood City Council & Los Angeles Board of Supervisors) held emergency meetings with local law enforcement to try to stave off future arrests until the conflicts in State & Federal Statutes could be resolved - bottom line - the FEDS noted their intention to pursue the matter to the full extent of the Law.

Now, Americans for Safe Access, are calling on Governor Schwarzenegger to step into the fray and resolve the issue...

According to ASA,

"Over the past several years, President Bush's Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has victimized patients and providers throughout California, undermining State Law and stooping to new levels to shut down access for sick and dying patients in California."

In view of this, Americans for Safe Access have launched a pressure campaign, with the aim of putting the spotlight on Governor Schwarzenegger, so that he will take a stand in respect to patients' rights.

According to ASA, Governor Schwarzenegger can accomplish the goal by taking constructive action now on the part of medical cannabis patients and caregivers, and give a nod to the will of the voters in California at the same time, by standing up to the Bush Administration.

In sum, ASA is urging the Governor to take a stand against Federal medical cannabis Law Enforcement efforts, and in the process, work at harmonizing Federal law with the compassionate laws of California and eleven other states that allow medical cannabis use.

ASA's new campaign consists of statewide call-in days, legislative visits from constituents and lobbyists, and sign-on letters from key public officials and organizations.

The campaign, building momentum in recent days, will be successful if concerned citizens take action now - by drafting letters voicing their concerns, sending e-mails stressing the urgency of the situation, or by appearing on the rally day in person to let their voices be heard in uproarious union!

The bold-faced effort is expected to climax at a mass mobilization effort on Thursday, October 11th, at 12:00 p.m., in front of Schwarzenegger's local office in Los Angeles:

Governor Schwarzenegger's Los Angeles District Office
300 South Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013

Additional info: Sonnet@AmericansforSafeAccess.org

Citizens unable to attend the protest are urged to call Governor Schwarzenegger's office and demand that he take a stand on behalf of California citizens with the aim of protecting their rights and putting an end to the DEA raids sanctioned against patients and providers.

The Governor may be reached in Sacramento at: 916-445-2841

In addition, an e-mail campaign designed to pressure the Governor is also underway.

Citizens are urged to send e-mails to the Governor to demand that he ask George W. Bush to recognize California Laws as they pertain to the compassionate use of marijuana, and subsequently, end the "war on patients".

*Citizens may use ASA's online action center to e-mail a form letter.

http://www.safeaccessnow.org

See you at the rally, Thursday, October 11th!!!