3
Showing posts with label Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Show all posts

Friday, May 22, 2009

Arthur Erickson...passes into spirit. The Canadian architect was dishonest and lacked integrity!



When I flipped through the morning newspaper and stumbled across Arthur Erickson's obituary, one or two disturbing memories were dredged up.

C'est la vie!

Years ago, our professional paths crossed in Vancouver (B.C.) when I was a struggling artist (painter/sculptor) and his star was on the rise in the exciting field of architecture on the picturesque West Coast of Canada.

One day, amid quite a bit of fanfare, it was announced that Erickson had been commissioned by the burgeoning city to design Robson Square (pictured below) in downtown Vancouver.

On the heels of the announcement, Erickson's architectural team put out a call for a dynamic piece of sculpture - to fulfill the role of centerpiece - for the tantalizing project which was going to span over several blocks in what amounted to a lush garden setting.

After reviewing the submission guidelines, it hit me like a bolt of lightning.

If I designed a piece of sculpture that was not only aesthetically-pleasing - but functional as well - surely I would nab the assignment hands-down.

After all, the neon tube light sculpture I conjured up in my creative eye would not only add an eye-catching decorative flourish, but provide much-needed lighting for the breath-taking open space which was to include a world-class skating rink on the landing below.

I hired a competent draftsman to professionally prepare the designs in scale, at which point, I excitedly submitted the professional package to the officials in charge of the competition.

A few weeks after the deadline for entries passed, I was informed by way of a curt letter that my concept for the "Light Sculpture" was rejected on the grounds that the materials involved - neon, transformers, and delicate tubing - were too expensive to render the art piece cost effective for the Robson Street project.

If I recall, the price tag was approximately $30,000.00.

A mere drop in the bucket, when you consider that the city fathers slated millions upon millions of taxpayer dollars to erect what was intended to be a "landmark" architectural gem in downtown Vancouver.

What a disappointment.

But, a few months down the road, the depression over the loss of the commission turned into downright anger.

One day, while I was perusing the morning paper, I happened across a notice that greedy self-absorbed Arthur Erickson had been hired to design one of the subway stations on the newly-approved extension to the existing line.

I was flabbergasted when I read a description of the design he proposed for the space.

Yup!

Erickson's "neon light" proposal for the space "mirrored" my own creation.

That slug literally stole my concept, idea, and design right out from under me.

I dashed to my typewriter (no table-top PC's in those days, folks) and fired off a letter.

In sum, I demanded that Mr. Erickson explain why an individual of his stature and prestige in the architectural arena - blessed with a deep well of creative and financial resources - would have the audacity to steal the work product of a struggling young artist without so much as a nod or a "thank you very much".

You got it.

Erickson didn't even give me the courtesy of a reply.

Ironically, when Robson Square was erected and a gallery had been installed in the mall area downstairs on the street level later, I was asked to exhibit a handful of my sketches and paintings in a group show of local artists.

At that juncture, the original sketches for the neon light sculpture I designed, had been beautifully framed - so, cheeky devil that I am - I displayed the incriminating sketches for all the world to see.

Of course, my intention was diabolical.

I proceeded to pen background info on the neon light sculpture; then, it was summarily posted abreast the three framed drawings, so the ugly issues would be in the forefront.

Natch, I included the details about the design being originally rejected by the team of Robson Square architects, then later "lifted" by Erickson without my permission for use at the subway station just a hop-and-a-skip outside of the city.

The allegations were hung in plain view; consequently, thousands of visitors to the gallery read 'em over a four week period.

In spite of the embarrassing finger-pointing, I never heard a peep out of Erickson.

Curiously, there were no complaints from friends or business associates, or requests that the "offending" tell-all be removed from the Robson Square gallery.

Nuff said!

The unscrupulous builder also rubbed quite a few architects the wrong way, too, due to his lack of integrity and ethics.

For example, Erickson was inclined to politic and back-stab in social circles, with the specific aim of securing commissions for his firm - and ultimately - exalting his name and reputation in the community at large.

For example, after the incident with me, he put his "foot in it" when he accepted a commission from Pierre Elliot Trudeau to design the Canadian Embassy in Washington (D.C.), in spite of the fact the judges chose another Architect's stunning design for the prestigious project.

In spite of an outcry (and scandal) that followed, Erickson didn't even have the integrity - or the decency - to bow out gracefully so that the winning entrant could take the reins and erect the showcase Canadians were entitled to.

Bad Karma must have caught up with Mr. Erickson, because the building he imagined the crown jewel in his lofty empire - was hailed in most quarters as lacklustre and a critical failure.

Questions were also raised over the years about his lack of foresight when he it came to the obvious.

For instance, Erickson pigheadedly pushed forward his designs for the "Museum of Anthropology" (a structure primarily crafted in glass that any fool with an ounce of intelligence could have anticipated might leak in torrential rainfalls) in spite of the fact he knew full well the flawed design was being erected in a region of the Pacific Northwest known for its unrelenting stormy blasts.

Yup.

It leaked profusely, on occasion.

Shortly after those embarrassing scenarios loudly sounded sour notes around the architectural landscape, his professional career went into a decline.

Sadly, the aging Lothario ended up a pale reflection of himself.

Haunted by his own demons, I expect.

I trust when Erickson met his maker earlier this week - that he was forthright about his sins - otherwise he'll probably return in the next life mere brick and mortar.



http://www.julianayrs.com

Sunday, September 9, 2007

Casualties of War...withdrawal from Iraq now!




As I thumbed through the Los Angeles Times today, the handsome young face of Staff Sgt Jason L. Paton of Poway (CA), stared up at me from the obituary section of the newspaper.

Paton, 25, was among 14 soldiers killed on August 22nd when a Black Hawk helicopter crashed in Multaka, Iraq, North of Baghdad.

At the end of his tour of duty, the army ranger planned to marry his pretty fiancee Nikki Palmer, then move to Georgia to serve as a training officer in the military.

Instead, he was cut down in the prime of life, never to experience the bliss of matrimony, the joy of a young child in his arms, peace in our time.

I count my blessings.

The draft was not compulsory when I was of military age in Canada.

Nor was I packed up and shipped off to some foreign shore to fight for God and Country, oil, or democracy plain upon its face.

North of the border, our inclination is to remain neutral in world conflicts.

After all, it is our sincere belief that cooler heads will prevail, given the chance.

In spite of our pacifist approach to human conflicts, on the other hand, Canucks don't idly sit by when threatened at home, either.


For instance, when the FLQ crisis erupted in Quebec a few decades ago and a couple of politicians were kidnapped by the extremist political organization, Prime Minister Trudeau took a stance which was swift and severe.

"The Government", he assured the Canadian people, "would not negotiate with terrorists".

Within a few short hours, Trudeau ordered Martial Law, and the streets were filled with troops to secure the status quo.

To protect one's borders - or to eliminate the enemy within - is obviously a battle worth fighting for.

But in the instance of Iraq - where the issues have been murky - shouldn't there be a sincere effort to disarm, and likewise, send the troops home?

After all, a number of mistakes were made from the offset which warrant action.

For instance, the conflict started on the premise that Iraq posed a nuclear threat.

In spite of the fact the allegations were later proven to be untrue, the U.S. maintained its military stance against Iraq.

In retrospect, many theorize the charges were just a clever ruse to attack, with the ultimate aim of ousting Saddam Hussein and his corrupt evil regime.

Even so, in spite of the fact Saddam was captured and prosecuted and punished for his war crimes, the U.S. continued with its surge willy-nilly.

Instead, Mr. Bush should have set a time-line for the occupation, stabilized the region within the confines of a specific game-plan, then ordered an exit.

However, the U.S. presence remained long after the first assault, in spite of protestations that the unwarranted attack on Iraq was about "oil" and the second-largest reserves in the region.

Thereafter, the Government wrung its hands about the endless unstoppable uprisings.

And, cast a blind eye to the senseless killing of young American boys on hostile foreign soil, for no rhyme or reason.

Why, oh why, must the U.S. continue to strive to be the Supercop of all Nations?

Frankly, in my estimation, it's time to withdraw from Iraq.

If the Government falters in the middle-eastern region, then a League of Nations should organize a multi-national army to stabilize the area, until Iraq is capable of handling the stewardship of its own independence.


Like Gandhi before me, I'm a peace-nik.

From his hallowed grave, I hear his voice:

"Aggression, armed conflict and violence are not the answer."



The Global community cries out for an effective peaceful means for the resolution of world conflicts among Nations.

The U.S. military presence in Iraq continues to hinder those efforts on the planet.

Imperialist military occupation of foreign countries must cease and desist.

Mr. Bush, given the opportunity, the United Nations will fulfill their mandate.

In part:

"To reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of Nations large and small."

"To establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained."

"To practice tolerance and to live together in peace with one another as good neighbours."

"To unite our strength to maintain international peace and security and to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples."

And to these ends:
 "To save succeeding generations from the scourge of World War, which at least twice in our lifetime, has brought untold sorrow to mankind."

 
coompax-digital magazine