3
Showing posts with label Anti-gay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anti-gay. Show all posts

Friday, May 13, 2011

Chaz Bono...fesses up he's a man inside woman's body! Gender Bender show ground-breaking!








Dave Letterman focused on a gender bender, the audience sat riveted in their seats stunned by the revelations, and Chaz Bono accused her body of betrayal.


OMG!

You had doubts about your sexuality identity, too?

For those of you Dudes who swear that you have been a man trapped in a woman’s body – for half your life – there is hope!

And, a little sexual satisfaction on the horizon, too.

More importantly, it’s okay to be a girly man.

Just ask former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Heh, is that why the terminator split with his wife this past week?

Just kidding.

Not!

All kidding aside, congrats to Dave for offering up a golden opportunity for Chaz Bono to openly discuss his side of things, from a distinct male point of view.

Say what?

In case you were kidnapped by aliens, and out of the loop for the past week or two, I’ll bring you up to speed.

Although Cher’s former daughter Chastity legally-changed her name to reflect a sexual identity change many moons ago, it wasn’t until just recently that Chaz elected to take the final plunge.

Uh-huh!

After a bit of psychological counseling, a lethal dose of hormones, and a smidgen of precise body sculpting, Chaz transitioned from a healthy female specimen to that of a cocky young stud on the sexual prowl.

“Did you mother suspect anything was going on,” Dave quipped, to gales of laughter from the studio audience.

The subject was a delicate one, so a levity (a truckload of it) went a long way to bolster Mr. Bono’s swagger – and ultimately engender - a confident turn down a road less travelled to the delight of Dave who was intrigued to say the least.

In fact, if Dave was confused about sexual relationship issues before the lights went up in the Ed Sullivan Theatre, he was probably less so today in spades, thanks to Chaz Bono’s man-to-man shock jock talk.

After all, the candid spot was not only a revelation - but – an educational one also.

According to statistics at least ten percent of the population is homosexual.

At a minimum, the ratings must have reflected that many hits at least at the witching hour last night (just betcha).

I expect that a curious America also tuned in, as well, if only to take a gander at “what’s become” of the lone daughter of a popular U.S. Music brand by the name of Cher.

For starters, Chaz has become a poster-child for the gay community.

“There are two components to contend with,” Chad underscored to Dave.

“The issues are sexuality and gender.”

Physical body and mind are at the forefront of the issue Bono stated matter-of-fact from the offset of the in-depth thought-provoking chat fest.

Dave sat up and took notice, for sure.

“Transgender individuals are lumped under the Gay & Lesbian Umbrella. Is it a good fit,” Dave probed from his easy chair on the podium.

For now,” Chaz acknowledged in so many words.

Aren’t they one and the same?

No.

And, that was the problem that Chaz was forced to grapple with from an early age.

“I was born in a boy’s body,” Bono asserted without blinking-an-eye as the audience tuned in all ears.

“Up until age twelve or thirteen, since there wasn’t much difference between boys and girls, it didn’t really pose a problem. But, when puberty came along, I became painfully aware that the feeling I was experiencing was not normal.”

When Dave quizzed Chaz further about the yearning to transition from unfilled woman into sexually satisfied male animal, Cher’s son was pretty upfront and responded with rapid-fire no-holds-barred insights that resonated.

I half-expected Chaz to crack open a brewski, loosen his tie, and bark out his opinion man-style.

“Fuck ‘em!”

But, the transition wasn’t easy, and certainly nothing to crow about early on.

Surprisingly, when the interview headed in a highly-personal direction, there weren't any pregnant moments prompting Dave to hide under the carpet for putting one heel in his mouth.

For example, in a bold-faced effort to turn the issues inside out to better shed light and understand them from within, Dave took a curious line of questioning to ferret out answers to nagging questions viewers must have been asking at home.

“If I was a man attracted solely to women sexually, and felt like I was a woman trapped in a man’s body one day out-of-the-blue, would I suddenly be labeled a lesbian?”

In response, Chaz noted that whatever sex an individual was attracted to before a physical body transformation takes place, their preference would remain the same.

That was a crisis that Chaz had to deal with - which eventually prompted Chaz to undergo surgery - to become a man physically (mind, body, and soul).

“I was attracted to women. Because I was a woman physically, I was perceived as a lesbian. In fact, I was a male trapped in a woman’s body who preferred to experience women in a heterosexual way,” Chaz struggled to explain to Dave.

Got that?

Now Chaz is a hot-blooded heterosexual, if you’re to believe his theories and back-up arguments, in support of a highly controversial (provocative) sexual identity issue.

For me, Chaz’s current incarnation epitomizes the persona of a gay male – physically and in mannerisms, for starters– so unlike the dyke image I once held in my mind’s eye until recently.

The fact that Chaz’s current girlfriend is bisexual – tosses an intriguing monkey wrench - into the scenario.

There were moments when Chaz also attempted to transform Dave a tad.

“Homosexual is an old term. The community refers to same-sex relationships and transgender ones as gay,” Chaz chastised Dave who was in the dark until now.

Bono referred to her situation as a "condition" which prompted Dave to probe further with a gleam in his eye.

If you took a magic pill, is it possible to be cured, he quizzed half-jokingly?

Chaz responded emphatically in the negative.

To me, an individual – either male or female – is cured when at long last they are comfortable in their own skin.

Amen!

http://www.thetattler.biz


Thursday, April 7, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court...Unconscionable ruling favors anti-gay protesters! 1st Amendment rights!








One headline said it all:

“Unconscionable but Constitutional”

Of course, I am referring to the high court’s ruling in favor of a hateful posse of protesters who were sued for picketing a soldier’s funeral because he was an “out” practicing homosexual.

While the actions of the rag-tag gang of Church-goers (!) from Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka (Kansas) was considered deplorable (un-Christian-like, if you ask me) the Supreme Court was forced to recognize that the protesters (headed up by Fred Phelps) had a Constitutional right to voice their opinion that the “U.S.” was “overly tolerant of sin” and that God allegedly “Kills soldiers as punishment” for their “gay” lifestyle.

To many, though, the Church group’s anti-gay protests at funerals – where shameful parishioners waved signs that read – “God hates fags” and “Thank God for dead soldiers” – were “sick” and in bad taste.

Although their message may have been lacking in any resemblance to the loving God portrayed in the scriptures – or his message of compassion and understanding and forgiveness – Chief Justice John Roberts noted that Phelps and his bible thumpers observed the laws of the land because they maintained a thousand-foot buffer zone and protested without “physical” violence .

What about the mental and emotional anguish they wrought on innocent mourners?

With an 8-1 ruling to back his decision, the bench-warmer wrote in his opinion that “even hurtful speech on public issues” merits 1st Amendment protection.

In sum, the hypocritical religious zealots won this round – rightly so – for the aforementioned reasons.

However, in the eyes of God, their reprehensible conduct was not only unconscionable – but, sinful - as well.

The scriptures are quite specific in that regard in at least two passage as follows:

"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

John 8:7

“Judge not that ye be judged”

Mathew 7:1

Amen!

http://www.thetattler.biz




Chief Justice John Roberts votes for 1st Amendment rights!
(no matter how hateful in nature)

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Don't Ask, Don't Tell...struck down by Senate! President blamed for miscalculating!






It wasn't even a squeaker!

Short of sixty votes, Democrats were forced to admit defeat today, when their bid for a repeal of the controversial Military policy - "Don't Ask, Don't tell" - was shot down by vigilant Republicans who gained the upperhand just moments ago once the votes were tallied in the Senate.

The outcome was a stinging blow to Senate Democrats and rights advocates who fought tooth-and-nail over the past year to have the military's stance on the issue of gays serving in the military overturned on Constitutional grounds.

The Bill's failure to pass means that an allotment of  $726 billion for defense programs - including a pay rise for the troops - slips through the cracks as well.

Politicians plotted to include the provisions for repeal  in the defense bill - with the hope that the Senate might vote "yeah" - if  only to save essential  military programs that legislators were not opposed to.

"The whole thing is a political train wreck," whined Richard Socarides, a former White House adviser on gay rights (who served with the Clinton administration).

Slick Willy was in the oval office when the policy originally went into effect, if you recall.

Socarides also accused the President of  outright "miscalculations" when the issue of the Pentagon's alleged bid for repeal was first raised.

The disgruntled activist took a swipe at the Democrats, too.

"If it was a priority for the Democratic leadership, they would get a clean vote on this," he said.

Interestingly, according to insiders, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev) voted against the measure as a procedural tactic.

Under Senate rules and regulations - casting a vote with the majority of the Senate bench-warmers - will enable the crafty politician to revive the bill at a later date if he so chooses.

He'll probably play the card for all its worth 'til then!.

In fact, Jim Manley - a Reid mouthpiece - has already conjectured that the Senator would be willing to allow more debate on the bill after the November elections.

"Today's vote isn't about arcane Senate procedures," Manley said.

"It's about a GOP's pattern of obstructing debate on policies important to the American people."

Indeed!

Since the policy was first made law in 1993, 13,000 soldiers have been discharged - for either openly admitting their homosexuality - or because they were outed by anti-gay troops in the ranks.


I did not have sex with that soldier!

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Proposition 8...no "gays" for a day. Ubiquitous "Man from glad" stays at home in protest!


Recently, Joel Stein (Los Angeles Times writer) tongue-in-cheek urged the LGBT community to organize a "no gays day" - much like the one that Latinos launched a few years ago - to hammer home the point that homosexuals play a vital part in the community-at-large (and in the marketplace) today.

The suggestion came on the heels of the widespread protests that erupted in the streets after the sad outcome of Proposition 8 - which ultimately - overturned a prior court ruling allowing same-sex marriage in the State of California.

Inspired by the hilarious musings of Mr. Stein, I proceeded to pen a naughty post in response.

As I was about to publish it, though, I held back.

Sensing that the issue was still too "hot" for the community to handle, I chose to relegate the amusing piece to "draft" status.

However, yesterday when I opened a copy of one of the local gay rags, I came across an article that alleged that there is a plan afoot at Facebook to organize a bona fide "no gays day" sometime in the near future.

So, I have hauled out the piece I previously wrote, with apologies in advance if I offend!

I started off by quoting Mr. Stein who howled in his article:

"Gays marching around West Hollywood and Silver Lake with their tired old placards, makes about as much sense as holding a John McCain rally next month at John McCain's house."

In the alternative, Stein elected to declare a "No Gays" for a day moratorium for December 5th, for example.

In no uncertain terms, the writer urged gays take specific action in support of the cause on that day, or another of their choosing.

"Gays should stay home from work, school, and do no shopping to prove how crucial they are to American society," he argued.

"No Gays for a Day will demonstrate what it would be like if - as so much of the non-coastal U.S. seems to desire - gays just disappeared."

The wonder boy conjectured that - unlike the Mexican protest - it was wholly possible that regular Joes in America may not have realized how omnipresent gays are in daily society.

The "strike" probably won't shut down the restaurant industry like the immigrant rally did, he chortled, but one thing was for certain.

"On December 5th fashion would not move forward."

He may have a point, I noted, on cue.

A "no gay" day may have more impact - let's say - than one held by Mexicans or African Americans.



As to a Latino walk-out - well, a day without the piercing drone of a leaf blower in Beverly Hills spreading hapless stray leaves this way 'n that (and back again) ad nauseam - would be a welcome respite from it all.



I also pine for the hallowed day when the soles of my expensive shoes are not soiled because of the incessant "washing down" of concrete and pavement by a battalion of Mexican gardeners like clockwork each morning, noon, and night in the Beverly Hills flats.

Frankly, a day without a snack at McDonald's or Jack-in-the-box, might do every American some good.

On that day - it's just possible - that middle America may be blessed with an epiphany and swear off junk food handled by unclean undocumented workers' hands once and for all.

A fast-food break from an unlicensed lunch trolley downtown may actually curb the runs for a day or so, also.

Of course, if Afro-Americans jumped on the bandwagon, the impact may be more far-reaching, a little more startling, and maybe a tad more inconvenient.

There wouldn't be a one-and-half hour wait in line at the post office for stamps, or a nasty encounter with a huffy clerk, who thinks she's better than the white folks she belittles each day.

And, you can forget about catching a bus across town.

If you're hoping to best that heavyset bus driver (with the plump ass, bad attitude, and ruby red lipstick) forget it.

She'll be the first in line to hang up her tacky uniform and head out for grits.

Tourists won't have the luxury of having porters carry their bags to a waiting train for a couple of coins of the realm.

And, in tony upscale Hotels in Beverly Hills, guests will have to struggle with their own expensive carry-alls.

Forget about a quick jaunt to the local dope dealer for a bit of crack, or a quick romp in a cheap motel with skanky pu**y.

No local pimp will be on hand to offer it up on a silver platter.

Yup, times would be tough for some, if Blacks stayed at home in South Los Angeles for twenty-four hours or so.

I expect that - contrary to what many citizens thought - there would be a number of hardships to bear if "gays" skipped their obligations for a day, too.


Blue-haired ladies would have to truss up their limp do's in a scarf, 'til Armando returned to touch up their highlights.

And, forget about a tasty meal at an upscale restaurant anywhere in Tinsel Town.


There won't be enough flippant waiters on hand to cater to any whim!

For a stressful day, discerning matrons may have to facilitate plastic flowers in the front foyer, because none of the fantzy-smantzy flower shops will have any flower arrangers on-the-ready to trim the tulips, arrange a few wisps of baby breath, or wrap the package in designer foils and fancy ribbons to tote back to the Manse.

Fashion victims heading off to Nordstrom's or Neiman Marcus will have to rustle up a bit of their own mix 'n match skills if they're inclined to snap up a bevy of ties, dress shirts, and suit ensembles without a stylist from Otis Institute on the floor to give the nod.

Many banks may have a shortfall of workers, too.

Didn't 'ya know?

Gays tend to be right where the moolah is.

God forbid, you should anger the touchy-feely sensitive fellow!

Yeah, gays tend to like to get a take on a potential mates' holdings, before hooking up.

Unless, it's for quick anonymous sex. The rules change, in that event.

Just ask George Michael.

Yup, whether you knew it or not, that fey little man with the attentive flourish at the teller's window, may be a homo keeping a watchful eye over your cash and checking balance.

Well, of course, this post is outrageous and brimming with shocking hate-filled snipes at various stereotypes - racially, sexually - whatever!

The point I'm making is that if we all wanted to get nasty with each other, there is a heap load of fodder in each - culture, closet, or backyard - to shake a big threatening stick at.

Ultimately, there are many ugly mean-spirited ways to rattle "cages".

The best case scenario?

Everyone in the community should stop stereotyping - and show compassion and understanding instead - to their fellow man, woman, and child - no matter their race, color, or creed.

And, bottom line, try to reach out and show empathy.

Give and take a little, if necessary.

As the old saying goes:

"Treat others as you would have them treat you."
 
coompax-digital magazine