3
Showing posts with label Nazis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nazis. Show all posts

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Cannes Film Festival...Brad Pitt film wins Palme D'Or! Kirsten Dunst Best Actress!
















 


 





In spite of the fact filmgoers booed the latest Brad Pitt flick ("The Tree of Life") at at screening at the Cannes Film Festival last week - the prestigious Festival honored the period drama - with the coveted Palm D'Or.

Although Mr. Pitt attended the exotic seaside celebration in Southern France, the elusive star was not in attendance when the heady news was announced Sunday afternoon.

The forty-something heartthrob jetted over off to Hollywood over the weekend to attend Angelina Jolie's Kung Fu Panda 2 premiere.

"Tree of Life" was directed by Terrence Malick - and also stars another Hollywood heavyweight - Sean Penn.

Kirsten Durst was a big winner, too, when she was named Best Actress.

Robert De Niro headed up the Cannes Film Festival selection jury this year, which also included two other high-profile stars - Uma Thurman and Jude Law - on the celebrated panel.

The Festival was not without controversy this year.

Director Lars von Trier was barred from Cannes Film Festival events on the heels of uttering of Nazi and Hitler comments which didn't sit well with guests of the annual event.

At another press conference for a documentary on the BP Oil crisis, Peter Fonda fessed up to media hounds present, that he fired off an e-mail to President Barack Obama this past week, in which he labelled the President a "fu**ing traitor".

WINNER"S LIST
CANNES FILM FESTIVAL 2011


Palme d’Or

“The Tree of Life”
 by Terrence Malick

Grand Prix
 Tie
“The Kid with a Bike” by Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne
“Once Upon a Time in Anatolia” by Nuri Bilge Ceylan

Prix de la Mise en Scene
Best Director
Nicolas Winding Refn for “Drive”

Prix du Scenario
Best Screenplay
Joseph Cedar for “Hearat Shulayim”

Camera d’Or
Best First Feature
“Las Acacias” by Pablo Gorgelli

Prix du Jury
 Jury Prize
“Polisse” by Maiwenn

Prix d’interpretation feminine
Best Actress
Kirsten Dunst for “Melancholia”

Prix d’interpretation masculine
Best Actor
Jean Dujarin
“The Artist”

Palme d’Or
Short film
“Cross Country”
Directed by Marina Viroda

http://www.thetattler.biz






Monday, May 10, 2010

Barack Obama...National I.D. card mark of the beast? Arizona law pales by comparison...






You've got to scrape that sh** off your shoes!
(Rolling Stones)




When Arizona signed into law its controversial Immigrantion Reform Bill, illegal immigrant supporters  were up-in-arms - and swore  up-and-down - that they would fight the controversial measure on the grounds that it was not only unconstitutional but might lead to racial profiling.

Surprisingly, one of the most vocal opponents, turned out to be President Barack Obama.

The Commander-in-Chief - with a murky birthright himself - proceeded to hog the podium and grandstand on the media airwaves across the Nation - vowing to curb the legislation on the grounds that it was not only intruding on the stomping grounds of the Federal Government - but intrinsically - was not what "America" was all about.

A gentler kindler nation?

Me thinks, the man doth protesteth too much!

If the truth be known, Barack Obama wasn’t necessarily angered - first and foremost - by the Immigration Reform Bill on its face in its bold-faced efforts to curb illegal immigration.

If ‘ya ask me, Obama was miffed because Arizona jumped the gun, and beat him to the punch.

I have suspicions that Obama has been toying with the idea of introducing the National I.D. card since he first took office.

If you recall, because the whole “concept” smacks of an Orwellian-style (1984) police state, there has been a lot of resistance to implementation.

Like any other proposal, Barack Obama was silently orchestrating things in the background - getting all his chicks in a row, so-to-speak - when the Arizona Reform bill was signed into law.

Suddenly, Barack Obama - though, not entirely ready to pitch it - was forced to reveal his plans for the controversial uniform National Identity card.

Some have cried out in protest that a police officer asking a resident for their "papers” amounted to an echo from the past which dredged up horrific images of the terrors of Nazi Germany in World War II.

Hogwash!

The National I.D. card is a much more ominous sign of the injustices to come if we’re to take a nod from a Biblical perspective.

In my estimation, the National I.D. card smacks of the mark of the beast.

Say what?

The Anti-Christ, of course!

In the scriptures, the Book of Revelations sets forth a host of  prophecies, which leave little doubt that Obama’s scheme for America (and eventually the globe) would be much more oppressive (and - ultimately - end the concept of freedom as we know it today).

Revelations 13:16 - 13:18

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads."
"And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. (666)."

So, which is worse?

A Nazi-style request for papers or the mark of the beast?

I'd prefer to show my papers, thank you very much!




Sunday, April 4, 2010

Pope Benedict XVI...crucified on Good Friday! Hollow figurehead for Catholic Church...







In recent weeks a scandal has been raging over myriad allegations of sexual abuse that have threatened to topple the Roman Catholic Church.

To some, it is ironic that Pope Benedict XVI is currently being crucified by a lynch mob (for hiding behind the pomp and circumstance of the Church) during the sacred Holy Easter weekend.

The sticky webs of intrigue are comparable to the tragic missteps of former U.S. President, Richard Milhous Nixon, in fact.

The attempted cover-up, after-the-fact, is a more heinous crime in many respects.

For the head of the Roman Catholic Church it is definitely a public relations disaster.

In a deceitful effort to effect some damage control - Father Raniero Cantalamessadog (the Pope's personal priest) - foolishly jumped into the fray which caused an even bigger uproar on good Friday (of all days) by making inflammatory remarks during a service.

During a sermon Cantalamessa read a letter aloud wherein a Jewish friend referred to accusations against Benedict and the Catholic church over the handling of sexual abuse of minors by priests as inappropriate.

Cantalamessa's friend, who was not cited by name, wrote that he was "following with disgust the violent and concentric attacks against the Church and the Pope," which reminded him of "the most shameful aspects of anti-Semitism".

The reaction from spiritual quarters the world-over was swift and severe.

Many Jewish leaders were outraged - for instance - and lamented in no uncertain terms that the comparison was "obscene" and "offensive".

Representatives for the victims of the sexual abuse condemned the analogy.

Rome's Chief Rabbi, Riccardo Di Segni, said the remarks were particularly insensitive because they were made on the day that Christians prayed for the conversion of the Jews, who were once held collectively responsible for Jesus' death.

Ouch!

Cantalamessa said he had included the excerpt from the letter in his sermon in a show of "solidarity for the Pope."

What a boo-boo!

A scant few hours later, the preacher apologized for comparing recent attacks against the Pontiff and the Catholic church to the persecution of Jews.

"If I hurt the sensibility of Jews and of the victims of pedophilia, then I am sincerely sorry and I apologize," father Raniero Cantalamessa told the Milan Daily (Corriere della Sera).

Cantalamessa also said Benedict, who was present at the ceremony, did not have prior knowledge of the contents of his sermon.

In fact, as the storm raged around him, Benedict continued on business as usual.

Benedict celebrated a Mass dedicated to the union between the Pope and the world's priests at St. Peter's Basilica on Holy Thursday.

Later that day, the Pontiff washed the feet of 12 priests in a symbolic ceremony to commemorate Christ's last supper with his 12 apostles on the evening before his crucifiction on good friday.

Meanwile, Venice Cardinal Angelo Scola, launched a full frontal-attack on the media.

In a homily on Thurday he categorized the Pope as a victim of "deceitful accusations."

What a load of hogwash.

Benedict has earned a revolting reputation for constantly ducking his responsiblities - and concealing his questionable past - from day one.

Shortly after he was installed at the Vatican, for instance, he proceeded to stall and delay in respect to  questions put to him about his youth, and engaged in decietful bold-faced attempts to hide his associations with the Nazi's during World War II.

Finally, he bowed under pressure, and coughed up flimsy excuses.

"We were young. We did what we had to do during the occupation," he asserted in so many words.

Did the jews do that?

No, they stood strong in their beliefs, and fought back.

From that episode in his past, it is evident that Benedict was a selfish individual, who was prone to protect his own a** (at any cost) and at the expense of others.

Then, during the selection process at the Vatican, Benedict and his supporters engaged in a lot of backstairs politicking geared to wrest the seat of power at the Holy See from more suitable candidates.

The hush-hush way the clandestine proceedings were carried out behind-the-scenes raised more than an eyebrow or two.

There is also the question of his suitability for the role.

I don't think that Benedict - unlike Pope John Paul II - has ever been touched by the hand of God.

And, it is doubtful - in my opinion - that his mortal soul will ever be imbued with the holy spirit, either.

Pope Benedict XVI is an imposter, in fact.

In addition to being a hollow figurehead, the disreputable scoundrel is a disgrace to the Catholic Church.

The sooner he's ousted, the better!

Amen!



Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Defiance...Jews who fought back! Acting tour de force...


The premiere for DEFIANCE at the AFI Film Festival in November was probably the highlight of the season.

Non-stop, the press were treated to up-close and personal interviews with a handful of the stars who wafted down the red carpet a stone's throw away from excited fans who strained curbside for a glimpse of their screen idols.

Vanessa Redgrave and Matt Dillon put in unexpected appearances, too.

Even, high profile behind-the-scenes power brokers turned out to tout the release.

Post: 11/10/2008

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/11/afi-festvanessa-redgrave-surprise-at.html

When Ed Zwick alighted for a chat, he was beaming with pride.

"The story may have been lost because Tuvia Bielski was such a humble man. Although he was considered a hero, he downplayed it."

Of course, he was referring to the man who inspired a community of Jews in a concentration camp, to steal away from the clutches of the Germans and seek their freedom in the wilds beyond the death camps.

Yes, Defiance is based on a true-life story about Jews who actually fought back against the Nazis in World War II.

There is quite a bit of action on screen - and likewise - no-holds barred violence on the heels of it.

Even still - the producers managed to weave a tale not only about the horrors of war - but the human condition, as well.

Unexpected twists-and-turns have been delighting rapt audiences.

A romantic wedding scene - shot under a canopy of grand old trees deep in a mystical forest - touches the heart and resonates, for instance.

The acting throughout is superb, with special kudos going to Liev Schreiber and Jamie Bell, in particular.

In contrast, I found Daniel Craig's acting style a bit too minimalist in approach.

For the most part, he was stone-faced - with little expression on his face - throughout.

And, his accent (?) was as fleeing as the wind.

In spite of those annoyances, I'm sure a shot of Craig shirtless in a romantic scene by an open fire, must have curried favor with his devout fan base.

The film was a tad long, but worth the price of admission, nonetheless.


http://www.julianayrs.com

 
coompax-digital magazine