A big flap over "to cut" or "not to cut" has caused erupted into a huge uproar in San Francisco in recent days.
Of course, I am referring to the unkindest cut of all, circumcision!
The controversy arose when a posse of well-meaning self-styled sex-perts launched an initiative on the November ballot in the upcoming election to ban the procedure (often conducted within hours of the screaming baby's birth).
In a knee-jerk reaction, opponents filed a lawsuit on the grounds that the measure is anti-Semitic, a threat to the religious freedom of Jews and Muslims, and an infringement on parental and medical rights.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs also argue that current law prohibits local Government from restricting medical procedures.
Hogwash!
The SFMGM bill is necessary to "protect all infants and children in San Francisco from pain and harm caused by forced genital cutting (and damage ranging from excruciating pain, nerve destruction, loss of normal, natural, and functional tissue, infection, disfigurement, and sometimes death," according to supporters.
I agree!
After all, I have first-hand knowledge when it comes to the issue of circumcision.
Because I was born in Canada in the fifties, I was not circumcised.
In retrospect, I count by blessings!
Frankly, I feel sorry for males who were forced to go under the knife without their permission.
In fact, a handful of male friends who were circumcised as children, have confided that they feel they have suffered a loss of sexual satisfaction in their adult life because of the barbaric practice routinely performed in North America.
Personally, I can't imagine how dudes "get off" without a foreskin!
When uncircumcised males manipulate their skin up-and-down over the head of the penis - the sensual pleasure is so great - that they just about go through the roof in a moment of sheer ecstasy.
In contrast, male buddies have moaned that if they don't use a little lube - not only will they chaff the skin on the end of their precious cock - but it is doubtful they will be able to blow their load!
Uncircumcised guys are lucky a hatchet man didn't snip their foreskin off at birth!
Just think about it.
It should be obvious to any fool - that if a male trots around all day with the "bare" head of his penis rubbing against his underwear or slacks - that it's bound to get "desensitized".
In contrast, an "uncut" dude's cock remains protected 24/7 to his erotic advantage.
For example, once the skin rolls back, the head of the penis is so sensitive to touch that it quivers with excitement.
Blow-jobs are phenomenal, believe me!
Years ago, I was strolling down a street in West Hollywood, when a rep for a local talk show invited me to be a part of the televsion audience.
As it turned out, circumcision was the topic of discussion.
A couple of guests on the panel swore up-and-down - that because they were circumcised at birth - they weren't experiencing all the sexual pleasure their uncut counterparts were.
"I was butchered," one lamented to all within earshot.
Understandably, when I stood up and gushed about how sexually satisfying my life was with foreskin, the audience was "sold".
The general consensus in the studio that day?
"Leave a kid's damn penis alone!"
Amen!
http://www.thetattler.biz
