3
Showing posts with label CIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CIA. Show all posts

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Blackwater...involved in sneak raids in Afghanistan & Iraq! Denial! Denial! Denial!



CIA thick in intrigues!





On Thursday, the New York Times published a report on their website alleging that Blackwater security guards were actively involved in clandestine CIA raids in Afghanistan and Iraq.

A representative at the company - now professionally known in industry circles as Xe Services - stated for the record that Blackwater was never under contracct with the CIA or Special Forces in those worn-torn countries.

"Any allegation to the contrary would be false," Mark Corallo asserted in no uncertain terms on behalf of Xe Services.

The key words are "under contract".

It is quite possible that Blackwater security guards were enlisted on the sly on a crisis-by-crisis basis.

In fact, one news organization was quick to point out that the roles and responsibilities of security officers and special forces often became blurred (or shifted into higher gear) in the battlefield setting at a moment's notice out of necessity.

It is alleged that Blackwater security officers were drawn in by the powers-that-be to take advantage of their high-level skills and their familiarity with the "territory".

The CIA has remained mum to date on the issue.

Over the past year or so - I reported on a couple of  Blackwater incidents (currently under investigation) - which resulted in the deaths of innocent citizens in the streets of Iraq.

Post::  10/29/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/blackwatercourt-hearing-for-trigger.html

Post:  10/24/07

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2007/10/blackwatertrigger-happy-security-for.html


In view of the foregoing, it's obvious why  Blackwater owners changed their company name to Xe Services.

To distance themselves from their prior image - as cold-blooded mercenaries -  of course!









Friday, May 1, 2009

Asian Pacific Film Festival...@ glittering opening night Beau Sia, Cindy Cheung & Art Hsu stroll red carpet! Bai Ling reveals Angelina Jolie "sexy"...

Bai Ling dazzles on red carpet!



There was a show of force from the Asian community last night at the Director's Guild as the Asian Pacific Film Festival broke out the bubbly to celebrate their 25th Silver Anniversary.

The glittering event was awash with film celebrities who strode down the red carpet in high-style as the paparazzi snapped away.

Beau Sia (Deaf Poet @ HBO) was a fashion plate who piqued a lot of interest as he ran the gauntlet.

When I jotted down his comment about being artsy-fartsy he was pleased.

"I'm into individual style," he quipped wickedly.

And, on occasion, the performance artist doesn't hold back when it comes to taking up a social or political cause.

Last night, for example, he sported a brilliant green neckerchief which sparkled under the bright overhead lights as a show of "Solidarity for the Swine Flu".

Bai Ling dazzled everyone when she glided up in an Italian Couture outfit which certainly overwhelmed me!

Her chic cocktail outfit was fashioned from a flutter of pink feather-like flourishes on top (a plunging neckline didn't leave much to the imagination by the way) which were the perfect foil for the body-hugging black skirt that accented her petite sexy figure.

Although SANS necklace, a stunning one-of-a-kind designer bracelet - and matching signature ring - struck gold in the accessories department.

The other evening Ms. Bai Ling and I danced the light-fantastic at the beach-side Newport Film Fest.

Ms. Ling is becoming a regular fixture at "The Tattler" & "Pop Culture" sites - a darling gorgeous one, I might add - with a frenzied fan base!

Look for the sensuous actress in Crank (2) in the near future.

"I'm the color in the film," she giggled.

Not surprising!

When I asked Bai who she liked in the industry, I was quite surprised by her response.

"Angelina Jolie. She's so sexy," she purred.

I was tempted to pose a question - Miss Ling are you bisexual? - but opted not to get too personal.

She noted that one of her faves in the biz is Richard Gere- a close friend - who she may work with in the future.

But, she's pining to be cast opposite Johnny Depp.

"You'd make a dazzling couple," I piped up as I noted I would get the word out.

Johnny, give Ms. Ling a call, will 'ya?

As Bai started to drift off down the carpet to a handful of photogs drooling at the mouth, she leaned into me and whispered:

"Come to my web site - Bai Ling dot com - so we can get intimate."

If anyone could turn a guy's - um - persuasion - it's definitely Ling!!!

The two young stars of "Children of Invention" were such a delight as they strolled by.

Michael Chen (11 years old) showed up in a Rock 'n Roll shirt etched with eye-catching glitter.

The charismatic young actor currently resides and attends school in upstate New York.

His favorite MBA team? The Houston Rockets.

When I asked the polite young actor what was the most difficult aspect of working on the project, he was quick to respond that it was the script.

"It was about this thick," he quipped, as his hands demonstrated a depth of about 5 inches.

There was one boo-boo that caused Chen a little discomfort during filming, too.

One morning before heading off to the set, his parents took him to the dentist to have braces installed on the lower teeth, without informing the director.

On location that evening when the shoot started up, the ubiquitous silver contraption turned out to be such a glaring continuity problem, that the crew was forced to summarily remove 'em pronto.

"It hurt," he recalled with a grimace.

Crystal Chiu, who played Michael's young sister in "Invention", looked for all-the-world like a perfect little China Doll, with her porcelain skin, deep soulful eyes, and enchanting party dress.

Although a bit shy on the carpet, she managed to confide in me that memorizing the scripted lines was a bit tough.

Jun Kim (West 32nd Street) just made the trek out to Los Angeles to pursue his acting career in Tinsel Town.

Mr. Kim is currently seeking an agent, so I promised to put the word out.

I've included a publicity still to help along the process.

Good luck Jun!


The Director and two actors who star in "Karma Calling" were on hand to promote their film which screens on Sunday.

One plot line reminded me of another popular Indian feature - "Outsourced" - which I penned a review on last year.

See for yourself how the film compares when it screens this Sunday (May 3rd).

The co-producer and Director of "All About Dad" had some interesting input in respect to their film.

The project focuses on conflicts that often arise with 2nd Generation Asian-Americans in respect to family and traditions in their culture.

An aggressive outgoing (handsome) young director from Alabama (Nathanial Nuon) strode up and invited me to his screening at 9:45 on Sunday evening at the Laemmle Sunset 5 venue.

"When I was a kid, I lived with some Cambodian refugees. So, I speak the language fluently. I promised I would tell their story one day."

"Residue" is a controversial and intriguing story about the CIA's involvement in Cambodia during the war in Vietnam and the chilling aftermath that follows several years later, according to the press blurb.

Art Hsu is a tall articulate man (handsome, too, though not reflected in the character shot opposite) with a distinctive voice who sauntered in to mix & mingle and exchange ideas with the filmmakers and actors at the DGA.

Just what I envisioned Film Fests should be all about: a forum for a meaningful dialogue about the film, the state of the industry, you name it.

In the near future, you can catch the dashing actor on the wide screen in the upcoming Crank 2 (High Voltage).

In the recent past, Mr. Hsu appeared in EQUUS (he played one of the horses) opposite celebrated Star Trek actor, George Takei.

David Magdael, head of Public Relations for the festival again this year, was thrilled with the large turn-out.

"There is quite a variety. 181 films," he beamed.

Before the opening night feature film - "Children of Invention" - sprang to life on the state-of-the art wide screen, a DGA rep welcomed the Asian Pacific Film Festival back to the fold for the 14th consecutive year.

"Treat this like your home this weekend," she urged.

"And think of it as your home in the future."

The perky young woman noted that a handful of DGA reps were in the audience to be of assistance to Asian Filmmakers in their bid for membership into the Guild in the event they were prepared to go one step further in their professional career pursuits.

Shinae Yoon, the Executive Director for the Festival, dashed up to the podium at one point and enthusiastically chirped:

"It's all about you!"

Yoon welcomed all the filmmakers to the annual event which is sure to be a resounding success this year in view of the slated line-up.

Info: http://www.vconline.org/festival/

Director Nathanial Nuon (left) with crew of "Residue"

http://www.julianayrs.com

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

CIA...memogate! Barack Obama to investigate torture techniques?

That was then, this is now!



The Secretary of State - Hillary Clinton - emphatically stated on a morning news broadcast that the Government should get to the bottom of it.

Later, a network news shows aired a terse statement Dick Cheney issued to the press in which he asserted for the record that he previously urged that pertinent CIA documents be declassified to shed light on the controversy over CIA interrogation "techniques".

Understandably, in the wake of a big brouhaha building momentum across the Nation, President Barack Obama is now pushing for an investigation of "memogate" and subsequent allegations that the CIA engaged in questionable information-gathering techniques that may have included acts of outright torture (such as "waterboarding").

A spokesperson for the Government was inclined to defend the CIA and its questionable conduct, after offering up two comments in support of his position.

First, he noted for the record that precautions always have to be taken to ensure the values of the American people are upheld in a civilized society.

Then, on the heels of that loaded statement, he inferred by virtue of his follow-up comments, that he was inclined to back CIA arm-twisting tactics now in controversy, due to the extraordinary circumstances that have faced the Nation since 9/11.

We must also defend the people from acts of terrorism and take whatever steps are necessary to ensure their safety and well-being, he added in so many words.

In other quarters, an official attempted to assay the fears of his underlings this past week, by alleging that the "interrogations" produced valuable information.

However, he stopped short of any bold-faced claims that the controversial techniques - which some say amounted to primitive acts of torture on foreign prisoners of War - made the practice acceptable.

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, President Obama expressed his own private outrage by noting for the record that the "methods" allegedly used by the CIA underscored that Americans were "losing their bearings".

Even still, the news keeps flip-flopping on Capitol Hill, as politicians appear to be taking cover to save their own sorry hides.

For example, Dennis Blair (Director Of National Intelligence) contradicted his own "statement" twice in one day.

In one memo that was circulating in the hallowed halls of Justice (!) in Washington, Blair asserted that useful information was obtained through the controversial CIA techniques.

Critics jumped on that issue when it was revealed that in a statement released later the same day, the top Intel honcho appeared to be reticent about taking the position that the interrogations - that facilitated physical abuse to extract information - netted any worthwhile data.

Blair is ignorant to at least one truism which may be his downfall.

For an untruthful individual to make their way successfully through a web of deceit without hitting a land mine or two, it is always of paramount importance to keep track of (and remember) the lies!

Yup, the fiasco did not end there.

In a third communication, after the press threw a spotlight on all the irregularities to date, an official turned everything on its ear when he piped up that the techniques were, in fact, fruitful.

"However, there was no way of knowing whether the same information could have been obtained through other means."

Bullsh**!

Does Blair think we all have "stupid" written on our foreheads?

Read between the lines, take stock of what has unfolded to date, and it should be obvious.

A whole can of worms is about to expose the ugly underbelly of the CIA.

Ultimately, it is only through the CIA memos, classified documents, and direct testimony of expert witnesses in the proper forum, that the truth will be ferreted out - eventually (!).

The Watergate break-in comes to mind at this juncture.

Which was the most egregious act - the actual break-in itself - or the attempted cover-up of the illegal activities after-the-fact?

Curiously, it was announced today that any CIA agent who simply carried out orders at the behest of superiors - will not be charged or prosecuted for any criminal acts.

Was there a behind-the-scenes agreement pacted with said Agents recently in order to pave the way for their eye-witness testimony?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Meanwhile, the henchmen - upper level management types at the CIA who structured the operations - may not get off the hook so easily.

In retrospect, it appears there was a "secret Government" within the "outer" one elected by the "people", operating beyond the arm of the law without any oversight or checks or balances.

And, they should be nailed to the proverbial cross, for that!

News at 11!

http://www.julianayrs.com

Friday, January 23, 2009

Barack Obama...torture bill signed. Human Rights advocates applaud move...


Human Rights advocates are applauding three executive orders Barack Obama's signed into Law the first day in office.

On their face, the orders seek to close down the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, end the CIA's use of interrogation techniques that many in the civilized world regard as outright torture - and ultimately - shut down a network of shadowy overseas prisons where the dirty work of the intelligence agency has been carried out since the war in Iraq began.

Many Americans may recall viewing a shocking expose about the issues on Sixty Minutes last year which established wrongdoing on the part of the CIA.

The in-depth probe established that sly government agents registered a plane to a P.O. Box under a fictitious business name - and under the guise of being a private enterprise - flew alleged terrorists overseas to allies of the U.S. who were ready able and willing to torture the suspects to extract information.

The feature film, Rendition (a thinly-veiled account of the scandal) stirred up a lot of controversy, too, when it was released in theatres nationwide and pointed an accusing finger at the wrongful (and potentially illegal) activities of the CIA.

In that feature, Meryl Streep's character - a U.S. Official - uttered a line that resonated with hundreds of thousands of filmgoers here and abroad.

"Americans do not torture people."

No, they just farm the work out, to keep their hands clean.

Post: 10/11/07

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2007/10/renditionamericans-dont-torture-people.html

Although the executive orders ensure that the U.S. will break free from a Bush administration policy that has been highly criticized - and likewise brought a lot of scorn upon Americans - the new President has not addressed any of the particulars.

For example, no decisions have been made about what to do with the detainees when Guantanamo is shuttered for good.

In addition, sources note that in spite of the executive orders signed this week, the CIA appears to still have a bit of "wiggle room" in respect to methods used to extract highly-sensitive information from terrorists.

The surprisingly quick move on the part of Obama was based on his position that the "executive orders" reflected an understanding that dates back to the Founding Fathers.

"We are willing to observe core standards of conduct not just when it's easy, but also when it's hard."

As John Adams astutely noted:

"People and Nations are forged in the fires of adversity."



http://www.julianayrs.com


Tuesday, November 13, 2007

George Bush crony...Ray L. Hunt signed secret pact with N. Iraq for oil exploration!



On the heels of reports that Ray L. Hunt signed a secret pact with the Kurds for oil exploration in N. Iraq - many concerned Americans were taking pause to wonder which came first - the horse or the cart?

Of course, it was always alleged that the United States attacked Iraq for the "oil", although reputable pundits and political analysts pooh-poohed the silly, hysterical thought!

However - in retrospect - the idea was not far-fetched.

For the record, it should be noted that Ray L. Hunt contributed $35,000,000.00 towards the purchase of land for the Bush Library. And, as a gesture of his appreciation, George W. Bush bestowed on Ray L. Hunt a prestigious post on the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.

Say what?

Some may recall in the cobwebs of the inner recesses of their minds that the Hunt family - from whence Ray L. was sprung - tried to corner the silver market a scant few years ago.

Nelson Bunker Hunt (born February 22, 1926) was an American oil company executive and chairman of Hunt Exploration and Mining Company (HEMCO) and the son of H. L. Hunt (deceased, 1974) whose oil empire started from poker wins which Nelson - nonetheless - inherited most of.

Nelson Bunker Hunt played a very significant role in the development of the oil fields in Libya which were later Nationalized by Muammar al-Gaddafi.

In 1973, the Hunt family of Texas - one of the richest families in America - hatched a scheme to buy precious metals as a hedge against inflation. Private citizens were barred from owning gold at that time, so the Hunts gobbled up silver in enormous quantities.

In 1979, the sons of H.L. Hunt (Nelson Bunker and William Herbert) and a handful of wealthy Arabs formed a silver pool. In a short span of time, they amassed more than 200 million ounces of silver equivalent to half the world's supply.

When the Hunt's started accumulating silver back in 1973 the price was in the $1.95 per-ounce range. By early 1979, the price shot up to $5 dollars. Remarkably - by early 1980 - the price stood at a whopping $50 dollars to later peak at $54 an ounce.

Once the silver market was cornered - outsiders sought a piece of the pie - but a combination of trading rules changed on the New York Metals Market (COMEX) and the intervention of the Federal Reserve caused the precarious game to come to a screeching halt.

The prices plummeted - a 50% one-day decline on March 27 (1980) - from $21.62 to $10.80.

The collapse of the silver market meant countless losses for speculators. Caught in the flap, the Hunt brothers declared bankruptcy.

By 1987, their liabilities had grown to nearly $2.5 billion against assets of $1.5 billion. After a thorough criminal investigation, the Hunts were convicted of conspiring to manipulate the market through an International Metals Investment Company in August of 1988.

Ray L. Hunt, subject of this post, stuck with oil reserves and scored big with a deal in Yemen.

At this juncture, Hunt moved into natural gas in Peru.

You know the old saying.

"There are no Nations, only Corporations."

And yes, the conglomerates have been special friends to the Bush's, believe me!

But, it's a two-way street; indeed, the shenanigans of the Hunt family - whether cloaked in the corporate veil or not - have prospered remarkably through ties with the Bush clan.

Unlike many of the powered-elite, Ray L. Hunt prefers to keep his name out of the papers.

For good reason.

In high society, it's often deemed gauche to have one's good name dragged through the spotlight - the focus of the lowly media - or used as fodder for the tabloids.

Limited intrusion by the press is a standard the old guard strictly adheres to.

For a Blue Blood, a requisite three presses releases are issued to the media during the course of his life which consist of a birth announcement, a formal notice of the "union" of two house in marriage, and - at the time of his demise - an understated obit.

But, Ray L Hunt's penchant for mystery may be motivated by his clandestine activities and the need for privacy. In fact, there has been a swirl of intrigue around his investments and business activities over the past year.

However, securing details about his private oil deals and investments is like pulling teeth, some say. Wild horses couldn't drag the info outta' him!

Democratic lawmakers moved forward on investigations pertaining to Hunt's oil exploration contract in Iraq last year, noting the company's ties to President Bush raised questions about whether insider information helped seal deals.

U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman (Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee) and U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) asked Hunt to turn over all Iraq-related communication with the U.S. government by a set deadline.

The lawmakers also demanded that Ray Hunt (Hunt Oil's chief executive) submit copies of information he may have received about Iraq as a member of Mr. Bush's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.

A Hunt spokeswoman said the company would cooperate with the request for "certain limited information." Typical Bush language for "no way".

Of particular concern are the facts surrounding the biggest oil exploration contract to come out of Iraq since the war began - which has upset, for want of harsher words - the Iraqi Parliament.

The Iraqi oil Minister denounced the agreement as illegal, but there is no law in place, so that the issues may be pursued.

In recent months - a law was requested to regulate in respect to revenue sharing - but the talks stalled on occasion because of the release of information about the Hunt deal.

In retrospect, it appears that while the government was fervently pursuing an agreement on the much-touted oil revenue sharing law, Ray L. Hunt was cutting his own deal with the Kurdistan Regional Government - and some accuse - contributing to the death of the negotiations in Baghdad.

In fact, it has been reported by informed sources that Iraq-Arab leaders were angered by the Hunt machinations; after all, they perceived the deal as a Kurdish power-play for the country's oil reserves.

In the final analysis, the deal shattered fragile negotiations for peace and an agreement to share oil profis in the region with the Sunni, Shiites, and Kurds.

One reporter lamented in response,

"Was there any flappy-jowled howling outrage from the Republicans in Congress? Any bellowing accusations of undermining the mission of our troops from right-wing loudmouths like Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and Rush Limbaugh? Nope! Not a peep. Why? Ray is golden. Ray is untouchable. Ray is a "Loyal Bushie"."

It should be noted that Ray L. Hunt's power additionally resided in the fact he has held posts on the Board of Directors for Dresser Industries, EDS, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Pepsi, and Haliburton.

More disturbing is the revelation that he is also on the Board of the American Petroleum Institute, a lobbying organization for the oil and natural gas industry.

In the past, Hunt donated oodles of money to the Republican party; enough - in fact - to secure an appointment as the Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee’s "Victory 2000" Committee.

But the real capper was yet to come.

In October 2001 (one month after 9/11) George W. Bush appointed him to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory. In sum, the panel of outside elders oversee whether the Commander-in-Chief secures advice from the Intel community.

"The President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) provides advice to the President concerning the quality and adequacy of intelligence collection, of analysis and estimates, of counterintelligence, and of other intelligence activities. The PFIAB, through its Intelligence Oversight Board, also advises the President on the legality of foreign intelligence activities."

"Through meetings with intelligence principals, substantive briefings, and visits to intelligence installations, the PFIAB seeks to identify deficiencies in the collection, analysis, and reporting of intelligence; to eliminate unnecessary duplication and functional overlap; and to ensure that major programs are responsive to clearly perceived needs and that the technology employed represents the product of the best minds and technical capabilities available in the nation."

"In carrying out their mandate, the members of the PFIAB enjoy the confidence of the President and have access to all the information related to foreign intelligence that they need to fulfill their vital advisory role."

Mr. Hunt, 64, has not talked about his role on the intelligence board which meets about six times a year. Its members are all Presidential appointees with security clearances and much of their work is classified.

Former board members and intelligence experts allege the membership doesn't often deal with specific intelligence. Instead, it is hinted that they focus on broader concerns such as whether one agency is cooperating with another or how a training program is working.

"Their job is to advise the president about the efficiency of the intelligence systems and where things need to be changed," said Arthur S. Hulnick, a CIA veteran who is now an associate professor of international relations at Boston University.

"It is more management than substantive."

That said, members must study intelligence-gathering efforts if they are expected to judge how the system works, Mr. Hulnick said.

"They clearly have to see it, things like estimates and daily reports, finished intelligence and analyzed intelligence," he said.

If I recall correctly, wasn't one of the excuses that Bush made about the errors regarding "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq due to "bad Intel"?

Mr. Waxman's committee have subpoena power.

"We are in the information-gathering stage," said Natalie Laber, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kucinich. "Before we hold hearings, we gather information."

Mr. Waxman (D-Calif) has held a series of contentious Iraq-related hearings in recent months. At one - Democrats grilled Blackwater - the State Department's private security contractor.

Members also investigated corruption in the Iraqi government.

In a climate of anti-oil, and accusations of invasions of Iraq for the development of rich oil fields, Mr. Bush has distanced himself from Mr. Hunt in the public arena.

In spite of the fact Hunt donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to get George Bush elected (and daddy, George Senior, too) and lobbied to build the Bush Presidential Library at SMC (with $35 million donated for the land purchase) our President claims he had no knowledge of the N. Iraq deal with the Kurds.

The accusations against Bush are typical. Critics allege he helped a big time contributor line his pockets at the expense of Iraqi peace.

Of course, the White house denies knowledge of the deal!

And, guess what? Ray L. Hunt is mum, too.

When Government officials dialed up Hunt for details, they were denied info.

His rep issued the following statement,

"We do not discuss deals with the United States Government."

Critics noted there was a simple way for the Government to determine how the deal came about.

Mr. Bush should call up his good buddy on his cell and ask point-blank, they argue matter-of-fact. In response, Mr. Bush stated for the record he was concerned about Hunt's deal if it jeopardized Iraq's ability to pass a National oil-sharing law.

In a letter to Hunt, Mr. Waxman and Mr. Kucinich asserted that Hunt's deal "may have undermined U.S. national policy of working toward the passage of an oil revenue sharing plan."

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's oil Minister was more strident and asserted Hunt's deal was illegal.

Congressional Democrats have jumped into the fray alleging that Hunt Oil managed to secure the deal with the Kurdistan Regional Government because it had insider information about the future of Iraq's National oil law.

"Ray Hunt is in a unique position to know what is happening in Iraq," said Rep. Edward Markey (Chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming).

Hunt Oil's decision to enter Iraq was only based on information that - "was in the public domain" - asserted their public relations department.

Hunt Oil and the Kurdistan Regional Government have said that their deal complied with the National constitution and noted that the agreement called for sharing revenue with other regions of Iraq. They said Mr. Hunt's political relationships were irrelevant to the firm's decision to explore in Iraq.

"The outcome of the deliberations for the national hydrocarbons law will not affect this agreement one way or another," noted Qubad Talabani, a Washington representative of the Kurdistan Regional Government.

The Government put a positive spin on the issue, nonetheless; with a straight face, representatives noted it was a good sign that investors wanted to put their money in Iraq.

Back to the question.

Which came first, the horse or the cart?

Some analysts have touted the turn of events as positive. They assert that machinations of Hunt Oil will motivate the three groups in Iraq to secure a National oil law to avoid future secret deals with Hunt and others.

Texas' Hunt Oil and the Kurdistan's regional government acknowledged publicly they had signed a production-sharing contract for petroleum exploration in the Kurdistan region of northern Iraq, the first such deal since the Kurds passed their own oil and gas law last August.

Meanwhile - a Hunt subsidiary began geological survey and seismic work with a plan for drill exploration to be underway fully by the end of 2008 - according to a press release issued a few months ago. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

"We're very pleased to have the opportunity to be a part of these landmark events by actively participating in the establishment of the petroleum industry," CEO Ray L. Hunt said in a prepared statement.

Revenue will be shared by the KRG throughout Iraq, consistent with the Iraq constitution and the Kurds' new petroleum law, issued by the Kurdistan National Assembly.

Despite Iraq's vast oil reserves, major International companies have basically sat on the sidelines - not only for security reasons - but because of the absence of legislation governing the industry and offering protection for investments.

Ashti Hawrami, the regional government's Minister of natural resources, argued that the Hunt deal is evidence the government's new oil and gas law created a "supportive and transparent business environment which promotes investment by international oil companies in our region for the benefit of all."

A major strategic goal of the signing may have been to resurrect an old pipeline route from Mosul in Kurdistan through Jordan and on to Israel. The pipeline would presumably follow the southern route on the map.

In the final analysis, critics assert that Hunt was in a position to know what Cheney and Bush would like to see happen in Iraq. Ultimately, because Hunt was privy to the grand strategy for the Middle East, it is alleged that he elected to seize the opportunity to use that knowledge for the profit of his own company and his family.

Investigators noted they intended to pursue the possibility that Hunt's connections with the intelligence community may have been more sinister; after all, a Hunt company aircraft was recorded landing at the CIA's training facility at Camp Peary (Virginia) in late November (2006).

There are some pressing questions as to whether Hunt's connection with CIA activities extend to covert activities in Iraq's Kurdistan.

Others speculate that Hunt may have allowed his company to be used as a commercial cover mechanism to ship arms and launder money for activities directed by the CIA.

More strident accusers claim outright that the Bush/Cheney White House used Hunt and his commercial enterprises to circumvent the legal requirements of informing Congress of covert activities by conducting such operations through the National Security Council (which Hunt is a member of) and the Department of Defense as "black operations" with no notification to Congress.

Hunt Oil, with its presence in Kurdistan, would be in an ideal position to serve as a commercial vehicle for such "black operations".

In time, perhaps the truth will be revealed. Do inquiring minds want to know?

In the interim, other oil companies have followed Hunt's lead in pacting oil deals with the Kurds. At last glance, the French company Perenco, had signed on.

Others will surely follow.

Then, what of the War in Iraq?

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Rendition...Americans don't torture people!


As the ushers led the way to the Theatre, we were confronted by a battalion of well-heeled security men in black suits who waved wands up and down our bodies to scour for illegal recording devices.

"Rendition" - a New Line Production - was being unveiled at the Grove and the producers were anxious to ensure that no sneak previews or bootleg copies were released over the Internet.

The excited audience settled into their seats in anticipation of the screening starring popular actors Jack Gyllenhaal and Reese Witherspoon.

When promoters noted fans were turned away at the door, filmgoers felt privileged to have made the cut.

Yeah, it may be a hit at the box office.

The lights fell and the opening scenes quickly unfolded in Cape Town, South Africa.

In moments, the audience was quickly thrust forward into the action, due to some deft inter-cutting of film footage and dramatic storytelling devices.

Suddenly, there was an explosion.

In seconds, we were thrust into the shadowy world of terrorism and espionage.

And, just as quickly, a foreign-looking man was detained by U.S. Customs and ushered into a side room for interrogation.

Based on vague evidence, the man - with a U.S. Green card and expectant American wife residing in the U.S. - was now being asked to explain possible ties to terrorists overseas.

When the government was not pleased with the response, a top-ranking official - played cunningly by Meryl Streep - barked an order to her disapproving aide.

"Put him on the plane."

No, this was not an episode of "Fantasy Island".

On the contrary, Rendition is an intense drama about the unlawful detainment of suspected terrorists who are stripped of their rights, by virtue of a shocking illegal practice that is sanctioned by the U.S. Government.

In this fictionalized thriller, the suspected terrorist is shunted off to an overseas ally, where questionable methods of extracting information are prevalent.

However, the CIA and others high-up in Government, disavow any knowledge of the atrocities.

On an aside - it's important to note that last year 60 minutes verified that the CIA did - in fact - own an airplane which was used for this kind of clandestine purpose.

During the course of the investigation it was verified that the CIA registered a bogus company - and the subsequent ownership of the aircraft - to a post office box in the United States.

Then, the CIA used a convoluted paper trail to conceal their alarming illegal conduct from the American public and politicians alike.

It's a touchy issue which is driven home in the film.

For example, when Gyllenhaal's character fails to extract any information from the prisoner, his superior demands to know why he is not making any headway.

He quips, "It's my first torture."

Streep's character responds angrily.

"Americans do not torture people."

Well, sort of.

From the 60 minutes expose - and through other media sources - it's been established that the CIA "farms" the work out and oversees the "operations".

But, the agency has continued to deny wrongdoing.

True to form, when Witherspoon's character tries to determine where her husband is, the tale takes a compelling turn.

A friend from college, who coincidentally works in a Senator's office, tries to help.

When he makes an overture, he's suddenly embroiled in a hotbed of political issues.

Go figure!

When the politician stridently plays the U.S. Constitution "card", Streep's character trumps it with her own, "National Security".

The film has a rich palette; in fact, Rendition is spellbinding to watch due to skillful lighting, excellent cinematography, and capable directing by Gavin Hood.

In addition, there are stand-out performances by Alan Arkin and Streep and a raft of competent supporting players.

Personally, I found Jake Gyllenhaal's characterization flawed.

There are shots of his character heavily-drinking and chain-smoking early on in the film.

But, there's nothing in the plot to support or explain away the behaviour.

The problem may be with the script and a failure on the part of the screenwriters to flesh out his character.

Just maybe, it's partly due to Jake's shallow acting style, too.

Blank stares in key scenes didn't register as "frustration" or even a "loss for words" to me.

In fact, I was troubled by the fact there was no light in his eyes for most of his performance - or even a perceptible reaction to events on occasion - when begging.

So, when his character finally takes a bold step - which causes the audience to clap and cheer - the right action is more-or-less an afterthought. After all, there has been nothing on the silver screen to support his sudden jolt from the deep slumber.

Well - you could argue that because the exercise turned up nothing t he was bound to release the guy anyway - with an eye to saving his back in the future.

Indeed, there was nothing heroic about the deed, which the filmmakers would have the audience believe.

The creative decision to flash forward - then back again - to facilitate the unfolding of the tale was confusing, too.

A straightforward approach to the drama - with a logical sequence of events (without gimmicks or clever manipulation) - would have been a better road to travel.

In some respects, the way the filmmakers introduced the characters, was intriguing.

By inter-cutting scenes back and forth (subtitled segments were basically assigned the territory of the "bad guys") the movie-goer was able to glimpse the thought processes on each side.

For this reason, a sense of humanity resonated in the characters - or didn't - accordingly.

The terrorists appeared to be resolutely urged on by "God" and faith, while the Americans appeared to be propelled forward out of a sense of duty to "country".

In sum, the message was laid thread bare.

For starters, there are a number of misconceptions about race and culture.

Bottom line - terrorism, torture and violence - can never be condoned in a civilized society.

What was the underlying message?

We're all human, with a basic need for love.

And, in the final analysis, war is not the answer.

Until mankind recognizes that, filmmakers will continue to exploit the issues on the big screen, in a deceitful effort to rustle up bucks for their own selfish end.

What did P.T. Barnum once say say?

"There's a sucker born every minute"

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Family Jewels...CIA releases sensitive docs!



The CIA at long last declassified reams of pages of top-secret records stewing in storage for the past couple of decades which precisely detail some of the worst abuses in American History.



The explosive documents focus with razor-sharp attention on controversial issues such as overseas assassination attempts, domestic and foreign spying, and kidnappings approved by top-level officials.



In short, a whole can of worms!



CIA Director Michael V. Hayden's confession to the press that the documents are unflattering is somewhat of an understatement.



The prolific records include accounts of break-ins, thefts, illegal wiretaps, surveillance of journalists critical of the government, and notes on a series of "unwitting tests", including the use of lethal drugs on U.S. Citizens.



Kissinger warned in the past that if the incriminating documents were released, "that blood would flow".



After all, high-level dossiers include detailed accounts of Robert Kennedy's alleged personal management of an assassination attempt on Cuban President, Fidel Castro.



Did they knock off John Kennedy, first?



Most of the major operations uncovered - albeit unwillingly - were revealed in varying detail during congressional hearings that later led to widespread intelligence reforms and increased oversight protection.



The reports, which have come to be known as the "Family Jewels", would make for an intriguing potboiler.



Anyone up to the task of penning the script?



Or do you value your life too dearly to embark on such a dangerous path?










http://www.julianayrs.com
 
coompax-digital magazine