3
Showing posts with label Christian Bale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian Bale. Show all posts

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Public Enemies...hollow film disappoints!! Style & technique enough to crow about...

Is it me, or is this a queer place to post film credits?



If you are an intelligent film-goer, you may be inclined to steer clear of "Public Enemies" - the much-touted piece of fluff starring charismatic Johnny Depp - which was just released in theatres around the country.

The film on the life & times of Public Enemy No. 1 - John Dillinger - roars onto the silver screen right off-the-bat with a smattering of edge-of-your-seat adrenalin-rushing action, then proceeds to move along at a fast clip.

Great, for starters.

From the get-go, I was dazzled by Michael Mann's (Miami Vice) expert film techniques, which admirably succeeded in buttressing-up the tightly-woven drama as it splashed gloriously before me above the footlights in lush exquisite detail from ambitious beginning to predictable Hollywood-style end.

The actors were often set strategically within the frame (profiles in silhouette, for instance, were often set forward - others farther back - to effect an unsettling tension (or unspoken relationship between the characters), while backgrounds etched in swift small strokes - or lazy wide ones - were offered up when needed to flesh out and add color to the mix when scenarios demanded it.

All-in-all, "Public Enemies" is a visual masterpiece on celluloid which manages to hold the audience captive by virtue of stylized filmmaking approaches and departures that resonate beyond the limitations of the screen normally.

The mesmerizing fictionalized bio - emboldened by gutsy straightforward believable dialogue and fine performances by a stellar supporting cast - is also a smorgasbord for the senses.

Pristine marble polished to perfection in bank foyer backdrops wows, and fashion flourishes from the period flaunt the excesses of the era and openly appeal to the sensibilities in their daring flights of fancy and drama, as the character-driven scoundrels sweep film buffs along in this cautionary tale about high-stakes crimes and a judicial system that is wanting.

The keenest eye could have been fooled, though.

Not mine!

Like a delectable dessert savored at each delicious bite - "Public Enemies" left a sickly sweet aftertaste in my mouth for a moment or two - then faded away.

When 'ya get right down to the nitty-gritty, the sensational Dillinger tale is just a puff piece.

Yes folks, all style and no substance.

A hollow film, in the final analysis.

No wonder!

When a film goer saunters beyond the initial gloss upfront - and likewise - wises up to the manipulative devices playing havoc with the heartstrings, there's not much meat left to feast on.

In sum, the filmmakers' failure to dig deep beneath Dillinger's skin, was their undoing.

Imagine that, the celebrated director didn't even bother to scrape beneath the pretty-boy surface (a little rough around the edges) or even try to fathom what made Dillinger "tick".

One line of dialogue about daily beatings from "Daddy" didn't suffice to fuel - or validate - the rage that ran rampant throughout "Public Enemies" just shy of two-and-a-half hours.

Eureka!

I've stumbled upon the answer.

Just maybe, there was nothing particularly intriguing about Dillinger, to warrant an over-the-top big-budget studio-backed effort.

Say, what were Dillinger's major achievements (claims to fame) in the grand scheme of things, anyway?

Busting out of jail, robbing banks, eluding the long arm of the law?

That's it in a nutshell, folks.

Bottom line, Mann was fixing to exalt a lousy thief!

I expect half-the-reason the Mann (some say he's at the top of his game right now) snapped up Depp to inhabit the role was to capitalize on an image that oozes non-stop with likability.

Just betcha, the studio was counting on Depp's magnetic persona to slop over and subliminally seduce fans and film goers slyly into the theatres and seal their fate at the box office.

That may have been one failing.

Personally, I thought Depp - though scrappy and menacing at times - lacked the ba""s to pull off the role effectively.

Universal's much-anticipated blockbuster cried out for a young DeNiro!

Even still, Depp stole the limelight whenever he appeared onscreen n any capacity.

Not difficult to do.

Christian Bale's characterization - after all - was wooden.

The FBI role he took a stab at required a stretch that was way beyond his acting muscle.

Ah, but he sure looked masculine (and virile) in a period hat when a smattering of spontaneous light & shadows struck his jutting jaw, just so.

When I am noticing silly details like this, the producers are in trouble.

Essentially, "Public Enemies" is just another gangster movie, albeit goosed up a bit with slick imagery and media-rich state-of-the-art modern technology.

If you want to sit back, nibble on popcorn, and forget about your woes for two -and-a-half hours or so, this is the entertaining bill-of-fare you've been pining for.

I'm betting discerning audiences will plunk their bucks down elsewhere for now and catch Depp's gangster flick later on DVD.

3 Stars!

http://www.julianayrs.com/

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Arnold Schwarzenegger...to appear in Salvation! Terminator 4 stars hot-head Christian Bale...

Yawn!



Thanks to Twitter, Terminator scuttlebutt is off-and-running and setting the stage for a much-anticipated star-studded red-carpet premiere next month.


When the Governator was first approached about appearing in "Salvation" (which stars temperamental actor Christian Bale in the lead role in what amounts to a 4th installment of the successful Terminator franchise) the former pumping iron stud thought the project might interfere with his "day" job, according to wife Maria Shriver by way of clandestine tweet.


And, you surmised by his lacklustre performance in Sacramento of late, that Arnold wasn't wiling away any hours in the office at all, eh?

Naw, he's just an effectual son-of-a-gun!

Anyhoo, the director conjured up a great film scenario when the dilemma reared its ugly head.

In the latest plot twist for the Terminator ("Salvation") Christian Bale's character will uncover the fact that Schwarzenegger's menacing persona is actually a "future" terminator ripe for blowing away.

Through the magical wizardry of leading edge technology in the special effects field, the aging Austrian hunk will grace the silver screen by virtue of old footage from the 1st Terminator movie - albeit - artfully touched up.

The studio vows up and down that no one will be able to fathom the difference.

Yeah, right!

I wonder, though, will filmgoers be treated once again to that eye-popping shot of Schwarzenegger dropping to the earth stark naked in the prime of his manhood?

Fans will have to spring for a ticket to find out.

"Salvation" isn't even going to make it to my DVD list anytime soon, though.

Like Arnold, the ongoing theatrical saga has gotten old and gray, in my estimation.

Not even Geritol could save the franchise!



http://www.julianayrs.com

Monday, February 9, 2009

Christian Bale...KROQ jocks pat selves on back! Attack mode for media...

Who's sweating?


KROQ disc jockeys gave kudos all 'round this morning on air.

Yup, they patted themselves on the back.

"Why did they want to interview us," one sleepy-headed disc flapper queried his co-workers, who were chortling it up on the low-brow talk fest.

"Because Bale came to us. No one else had the story."

"Yeah, he said we made him laugh all week, so that's why he dialed in," another airhead boasted on the sidelines in the studio.

Then, the gang of merry pranksters played a clip of a reporter from "Extra" who interviewed the KROQ staffers.

It's kind of like a snake eating itself up, one cackled.

"Yeah," another chimed in, "it's like the pilot at a plane crash. If you can't talk to the pilot, then latch onto a bystander to get the goods."

"We were the only ones Bale would talk to, that's why."

According to the Extra staffer, this is what went down.

"It was completely off the cuff with KROQ disc jockeys," he excitedly reported to his rapt audience.

"It wasn't planned, so they weren't prepared with any questions or anything."

At this juncture, they proceeded to tear him to shreds!

So much for biting the hand that feeds you, eh?

The dudes were inclined to also take jabs at a female reporter at highly-rated TV news show - the obnoxious inflections in her voice and the overly-dramatic use of sensational adjectives and colorful superlatives, in particular - and the manner in which she described the wild Bale "tirade" which had the country wagging their tongues all last week.

In fact - in spite of the fact they criticized others for much ado about nothing - the dim-witted jocks continued with their field day ad nauseam as they took pot shots at bloggers, lambasted newsies on the net, and so forth and so on.

"It was as if Bale's apology wasn't enough. Too late," one scoffed.

"Did they expect Bale to come to their home in person?"

At this point, a female employee noted that during the tirade the hothead actor appeared to carry over with his "American" accent during the dressing-down of the Director of Photography.

Indeed, on air on Friday, Mr. Bale had a noticeable English accent which was the norm.

So, bored fools that they are, they proceeded to muse aloud.

"Do you suppose he was so in character that it was difficult for him to step out of that intense acting situation?"

On the heels of this insightful remark (!), they theorized that the Bale incident may prompt filmgoers - and the curious - to take in the flick when it is released, so they can fathom for themselves what kind of intense acting he was involved in that resulted in such a bizarre turn-of-events to unfold for almost four minutes on set.

Just maybe, it was all a publicity stunt concocted by Bale, to prop up a flailing career?

Yeah, those Dudes at KROQ are such lapdogs!

They'll eat anythin' up!

When it comes down to it, judging by what I heard bright and early at the crack of dawn, they're just a bunch of inglorious bast**ds with sh** for brains!





http://www.julianayrs.com

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Christian Bale...eats crow! Journalist Rachel Abramowitz at LA Times unprofessional re: TMZ!

Director of Photography lucky Bale didn't scratch his eyes out!



Christian Bale has fessed up!

"I was out of order beyond belief. I was a punk," he admitted to a disc jockey on air at KROQ yesterday.

The mea culpa was in response to an incriminating audio recording posted on the TMZ web site which painted a picture of a pampered star with a flair for the dramatic and prone to engage in abusive unprofessional conduct.

As I reported at this blog site on the Tuesday last, Bale blew his stack when a Director of Photography on "Terminator Salvation" fussed-about a little too close to the touchy actor as he was emoting for a crucial scene in the big-budget feature.

In a nutshell, Shane Hurlbut innocently stepped into Bale's eye line, annoyed the spoiled actor - and thereafter - was summarily dressed up-and-down in a tirade spiced with salty language that shocked fans around the country!

Post: 02/03/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/02/christian-baleshocking-tirade-on-set.html

Disc Jockeys jumped into the fray - and in a scant few hours - the tongue-wagging about Bale's scandalous conduct reached a fever pitch.

When the sexy star tuned in and got an earful of the criticisms - and heard playbacks of the ugly tirade that swept his emotions away that fateful day - he acknowledged he wasn't pleased with his conduct, either.

"There is nobody who heard the tape who is hit harder than me. I make no excuses for it. It is inexcusable."

That said, one has to wonder, does Bale intend to enroll in an anger management class with the specific aim of curbing that kind of unprofessional conduct in the future?

By the way, on the topic of a - "lack of professionalism" - the spotlight should also be thrown on LA Times writer, Rachel Abramowtiz.

In today's daily, Ms. Abramowitz reported on the incident, but displayed a shocking lack of ethics and professionalism in the process.

Why?

The writer never referenced the original source material.

Although TMZ secured the incriminating evidence - and was first to release the shocking tape and point the finger at Bale's disturbing abusive conduct in the mainstream press - Abramowitz never bothered to give any credit to the source.

I seriously have to wonder if the she ever took any courses in Journalism.

If I am not mistaken - "Ethics in Journalism" and "Citing Sources" - are discussed in Journalism 1, aren't they?

Shame!



Abramowitz under mistaken impression she's the star!

http://www.julianayrs.com

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Christian Bale...shocking tirade on set jolts the biz! No. 1 a**hole...


Bale a fu**ing mean Hombre?


An audio recording of Christian Bale throwing a fit on the set of his latest movie had tongues wagging this morning around the Nation.

In fact, disc jockeys were having a field day with the clip - recorded months ago - that TMZ posted on their web site over the week-end.

Allegedly, the director of cinematography stepped into the set to adjust a light - at which point - Bale let into him.

The audio tape reveals that the surprised crew member was not only subjected to verbal abuse, but physical threats, as well.

And, the spoiled actor's outburst wasn't just a short little tantrum, either.

The shocking tape lasts about three and a half minutes and is so riddled with foul language, that after "bleeps" were edited in to block out the offensive swear words, there wasn't much left on tape for the curious to make hide-nor-tail of.

Clever staff at one radio station seized on the opportunity bright and early this morning to hold a little contest on air.

"How many "F" bombs did Christian Bale hurl," one jock queried his audience.

"Call us right now and see if you can correctly put your tongue on the number."

Of course, it is not unusual for a crew member - especially a director of cinematography - to step into a hot set while a scene is being rehearsed or filmed to tweak a light or some such thing.

So what was the big fuss?

Well, a few actors in the business have a problem with concentration.

Tommy Lee Jones and Joan Collins, for instance, don't like bystanders stepping into their eye line as they are working because it may throw distract them.

Many directors are aware of that and usually make allowances by forewarning the crew and other cast members in advance before an actor arrives on set.

Notwithstanding, Bale's abusive conduct - and the subsequent thorough dressing-down of the crew member - was inappropriate and downright unprofessional.

After swearing at the man, and thoroughly humiliating him in front of everyone present on the movie set, the B-list movie actor threatened to "smash his lights".

Did he mean he was going to trash the light set-ups or was it a veiled threat?

Was Bale implying that he might punch the DP in the face?

It appears that the actor, known for being picky, is a time bomb waiting to go off.

Last year, many in the business were taken aback, when Christian Bale was accused of some violence in a Hotel room overseas.

On that occasion, he narrowly escaped criminal charges for assault.

Many thought the incident was an isolated one brought on my career pressures, or - quite simply - amounted to a squabble with family members that was simply blown out of proportion by his accusers, the media, and so forth and so on.

Even so, the reprehensible behaviour he exhibited in a work-related setting, underscores that Bale clearly has some anger management issues to address!

I am surprised that in view of what went down, that the actor didn't secure the incriminating recording months ago to prevent it from being released to the media at a later date.

In view of the fact the "sound man" is usually considered a tight-knit part of a crew that works closely with the cinematographer, obviously there has been some skullduggery underfoot behind-the-scenes.

Did the DP ask the audio-recorder to put the tape away for safe-keeping?

And, why did it get released now, and not six months ago when the first incident sprung forth in all its ugly fury?

Enquiring minds want to know!


Handsome is as handsome does!

http://www.juilanayrs.com

Thursday, September 6, 2007

3:10 to Yuma...Russell Crowe Western thrills!


If you're into macho dudes swaggering around in chaps, dusty leather boots, and ubiquitous cowboy hats - "3:10 to Yuma" is the movie for you!

To date, the western has held a captive audience in its sway - mainly because of the charismatic on screen presences of Christian Bale and Russell Crowe - among others.

The tight intelligent script propels the storyline along without too many hitches.

Of course, there are a couple of lapses in judgment (moments of disbelief) but the audience is able to forgive some of the detours and implausible plot twists, so engaging are the characterizations on screen.

All the high-pitched action - and the screen is chock full of it from beginning to end - starts out simply enough.

A gang of outlaws swoop down on a Stage Coach and make off with the booty.

The Sheriff catches up with one of the lone criminals at a local watering hotel in town and faces the task of hauling him to the station where he'll have to embark on an arduous train ride to the State Prison in Yuma with prisoner in tow.

Hence, the title, "3:10 to Yuma".

With the gang leader's cohorts still at large, the law man is forced to hire out a handful of locals to ensure the outlaw is securely placed on the train without incident.

Christian Bale's character, a down-on-his-luck rancher, steps forward to sign up.

Although he's a real sharp shooter, it's the lure of cold hard cash that prompts him to take on the task.

The rancher reckons the payload will save his farm on the brink of foreclosure from the greedy clutches of a corrupt local lender.

Along the treacherous way - there are a number of clever twists and humorous turn-abouts - and enough rough-housing and fancy gun play to satisfy any fan of the western genre hungry for thrills.

Yes, "Yuma" is buoyed up by a well-crafted script and a cast of believable characters who are a delight to second-guess.

What we have here is a fistful of rugged individuals determined to succeed in their goal whatever the sacrifice may be.

There's the tough-as-nails bounty hunter out to haul the wanted man back to Yuma to face justice at any cost, the humble rancher out to earn an honest day's pay, and the crafty - but likable outlaw - biding time 'til his pals set him free.

There are no holds barred here.

And, to its credit, the action-packed western doesn't cop out at the end.

Russell Crowe is at the top of his game here, mainly because his performance is seamless, never stilted or phony.

His acting stint in "Yuma" is worth the price of admission alone.

Bale never disappoints either.

The actor's actor inhabits the role of a tough son-of-a-gun with ease.

In this well-directed, lush screen adventure, the characters not only think - but subtly reveal their conniving machinations convincingly on screen - by virtue of well-thought out story-telling devices.

In fact, on occasion, a character or two transforms right before the eyes.

When this occurs, it's a memorable moment captured on celluloid.

In sum, "Yuma" is a revealing look at the human condition.

But, because the tale flows from the whimsical pen of a screenwriter, not entirely true to life on occasion.

But, the theatre-goer can excuse its follies, because it is so darn rich in its layers elsewhere.

There is a lot of action, some dalliance with time-honored ideas about father-son relationships, and a struggle between the forces of good and evil.

A touch of morality is thrown in for good measure.

Not a great film, but the project is rendered well on screen, and will undoubtedly satisfy across the demographic.

One of the best westerns to come down the pike in a while.
 
coompax-digital magazine