Donald Trump...the chump in Beauty Queen fiasco! Aging Lothario led around by end of di**...

"Good pu**y is hard to find," says the "Donald"

One pundit put it quite succinctly yesterday on one of the dizzying array of network new shows blitzing the airwaves with updates on the Donald Trump beauty Queen fiasco that has unfolded in the last twenty-four hours.

"When men view half-naked photographs of sexy women, they get stupid."

A case in point.

In spite of the fact a handful of revealing photographs of Ms. California were circulating the Internet and stirring up a controversy, Trump opt to pooh-pooh the critics and look the other way.

To many, the aging letch simply succumbed to the animal side of his male nature.

"Trump's being led around by the end of his di**," some are lamenting.

Many reporters are also irked by the arrogance of the man and his bold-faced efforts to sweep the truth under his - um - rug.

For example, when Ms. California was asked a pointed question about the nude photographs - and whether or not she lied to pageant officials - Trump stopped the line of questioning short.

"That's an unfair question."

Hogwash!

News anchors - and gossip mongers alike - were stunned by Trump's flagrant disregard for the truth.

Although Ms. California lost her tarnished crown earlier in the week - rightly so, in my opinion - Trump chose to reinstate the statuesque flake yesterday.

The "Donald" is owner of the Miss Universe and USA Pageant system and - yes, choke on this - final arbitrator on all such matters.

So, the co** teaser gets off scott-free.

But, the intrigues don't stop there!

One celebrity gossip alleged in one updated news flash yesterday that the whole "gay marriage" controversy was a set-up from the get-go.

"Pageant officials instructed Perez Hilton to pose that question," one insider alleged matter-of-fact as jaws dropped in the newsroom.

Then, there is the question of ethics.

Allegedly, the pageant paid for Ms. California's "boob job".

In the final analysis, Trump had to protect his investment, eh?

And, what did the lounge lizard get in return?

News at 11.

A hard-on for blonds!

http://www.julianayrs.com/

Disc Jockey's comments about 10 yr. old daughter inappropriate? Child welfare, please...

A couple of DJ's were chatting on a  talk show the other morning and having a big chuckle over delicate matters regarding a Disc Jockey's 10 year-old daughter.

Frankly, I was shocked by his disgusting comments, which - ultimately - took a poke at his daughter's budding sexuality on the airwaves around the Nation.

Some nurturing father!

For instance, the radio host (in-between ads for the Tim Conway Jr. show)  laughed to one of the disc jockeys at his side, that his daughter's "nipples" were just "popping".

What kind of language is that to use in respect to a child's blossoming?

But, it was another remark that really floored me.

The sick radio personality laughed that he strolled into the bathroom on one occasion when his naked daughter was taken a bath - and subsequently - caught her shampooing her "one" hair (in the vagina area).

What a - rude, insensitive, distasteful comment - to utter up about his innocent young child, with the specific aim of entertaining strangers tuned in to the show.

One person I spoke to noted that he thought that one of the Disc Jockey's names mentioned in the broadcast had a  daughter who was younger, so I have to wonder if he was just using her as a spring board for a series of jokes that may have been totally without any substance?

Even still, to project those ideas (fantasies?) over the airwaves (especially in view of the current ongoing "Stiles" case underway in Las Vegas) is morally wrong.

Does a loving father really want his young daughter to grow up and have strangers joke to her at a later date, that they used to listen to her father joke about her public hair and nibbles on the radio?

If the disc jockey in questiion has stole custody of the girl, then I would urge that Child Welfare pay the  household a visit.

Who knows, maybe he's walking around the house with a hard-on or having sex in front of his daughter, without shame or heart-felt concern for her mental (and sexual) health and overall well-being.

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but in my view, children need to be protected from this kind of senseless (dangerous) conduct by lame parents who don't think about the ramifications of their actions.

Did he never consider the possibility that by talking in such risque way about his child, some letch on the other end of a radio may become titillated by the fantasies, and go after her?

In my mind's eye, he was placing her safety in jeopardy, when he elected to use her as a sexual punchline!

Shame!

William Butler Yeats once wrote:

"The innocent and the beautiful have no enemy but time."

http://www.julianayrs.com