3
Showing posts with label Bill of Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill of Rights. Show all posts

Saturday, February 27, 2010

West Hollywood...Police State & Sheriff misconduct! Rights violations...







Now that the weather is perking up with days filled with glorious sun and clear skies, you may be inclined to roll up your sleeves and clean up your car at the curb in the street.

If you live in West Hollywood, you may want to think twice about that, unless you do not mind a shake-down by the local Sheriff's department.

One resident flung the doors of their late model vehicle open wide, and started an energetic purge, when a squad car cruised by.

Huh?

In a jiffy, the officer made a quick "u" tune, and proceeded to drive up the "wrong side" of the street (causing other drivers to shake their head in disbelief) and slowly ease his vehicle alongside the individual's car until his eyeline was just slightly forward of the back hatch which was wide open and revealed the contents packed inside.

"What are you up to, Sir," he asked in so many words.

Duh!

To most reasonably intelligent folks, it probably would have been obvious that some spring cleaning was going down.

Shaken, but not stirred (as James Bond might quip) the driver politely informed the Sheriff  that he was tidying up his vehicle since it was great weather to be outdoors and active.

At this point, the Sheriff (obviously with a stick up his butt)  asked the WeHo resident if he had any ID on him.

Huh?

A uneasy feeling rippled through his body as he tried to fathom what was going down.

Was a Law Enforcement Officer legally entitled to ask for identification from a citizen without provocation or reasonable grounds to make such a demand?

The resident hesitated, and wondered to himself if he should perhaps deny the request, on legal grounds.

Because he'd heard horror stories - as he put it -  about what happens to individuals when they stand up to a cop's alleged authority (getting mouthy or treating them with disrespect in their mind set) he was inclined to hand over his license with some reservations.

The Sheriff proceeded to input his name and address into the computer.

Nada.

After noticing that the mailing address on the license was a P.O. Box he quizzed the driver about his home address.

Again, the WeHo resident was a little taken aback, bywhat he thought was an inappropriate question.

Was he entitled to obtain  that information - or request it - in this particular instance?

Needless to say, afraid that cop might react in a negative way (or try to find some fault to retaliate), he complied reluctantly.

When it came to the interrogator's attention that the owner of the vehicle lived a few blocks away, the bully demanded to know why the spring cleaner was "over here".

Gosh, the driver explained to moi, I didn't know there were so many silly restrictive  laws in West Hollywood.

Who would have thought that cleaning out your car on a sunny day was illegal, or travelling from one section of a neighborhod to another, required permission from the local Sheriff's department!

At this point, the smirking Sheriff  handed back the license, before slapping him in the face with some stupid comment like:

 "Have a nice day."

What an a**hole!

No wonder, when you consider the criteria for landing a job at the WeHo Sheriff's Department!

The candidate need only pass a GED (a "D" will squeak him or her through), stand at least five foot nothing, and love to gobble down doughnuts with sprinkles on top.

And, have a psycho yearning to wear a badge to bolster his manhood!

After all, I expect these wobbly-kneed jerk-offs were once nerds who got sand kicked in their faces, and laughed at day-in and day-out at school.

And, just try to fight a ticket in court, when these slippery characters show up to tell their side of things.

It is pretty much a given they will lie through their teeth.

What is a synonym for law enforcement officer?

Professional liar!

It's pretty obvious from other stories I've heard that WeHo Sheriff's have a flagrant disregard for citizen rights.

Because of it, the upscale community is fast-becoming a police state, of sorts.

They were scraping the barrel when they rustled up these pigs, one astute neighbour asserted.

Amen!


Wednesday, December 16, 2009

WordPress...discriminates! Engages in unlawful censorship & Violates blogger rights!



In the beginning there was the word!
(WordPress under false impression they created it)





Over at WordPress bloggers are grumbing that management is "playing God" - the end result being - that the privilege to post an article may be unjustly denied without proper legal notice simply because an individual in the employ of the blog site doesn't agree with what the author has penned at their site.

Also, because of WordPress's lack knowledge  in respect to binding State & Federal laws, bloggers have suffered the loss of the rights guaranteed them under the1st Amendment and the Bill of Rights..

Specifically - the highly unethical & illegal conduct of staff at Wordpress - not only amounts to a denial of the right to free speech - but also the right to due process (a fair hearing).

I suppose this is what happens when a gaggle of computer geeks start up a company without a clue!

Well, they may be in for a rude life-shattering shock.

One blogger I am in touch with is inclined to file a lawsuit for damages!

How do you like them apples, dudes?

News at 11!


Thursday, April 9, 2009

Dallas...police are pigs who harass tourists!


Downtown Dallas is sprinkled with fine museums, chic upscale restaurants to take brunch in, and a bevy of trendy boutiques so you can shop-til-you-drop.

But, just try to plunk down on a knoll of grass for a moment (if you can find one; downtown Dallas is all concrete, after all) and the city's finest will ride out-of-the-blue on a rickety old bike and rudely bark out:

"Get along little doggie."

For example, today I spied a tourist stretch out on a mound of grass to take a respite from it all under a glorious mid-day sun, when he was urged to move on by a couple of law enforcement officers.

When the upscale gentleman in town on business noted he want to take a breather in the parkk for a second or two, one overzealous copper was inclined to snidely remark:

"They don't like that here."

They?

You'd think with the economy failing the way it has been, Dallas and its residents, would be welcoming visitors (and the influx of ready cash) with open arms.

In addition to being thick around the waist and butt, these two losers appeared to be thick in the head as well.

I wanted to point out that one of the last sacred rights an individual has in this great nation is the one that provides that citizens be able to walk the streets freely (and sit in a park openly) without the threat of harassment or a violation of their rights.

But, I expect "they" would have hauled me away and silenced my voice much like they did to another advocate of basic rights and freedoms way back in Dallas in 1963

Dallas, get rid of your "pigs".

After all, they're a detriment to your image!



Thursday, February 19, 2009

Facebook...terms of use changed in wake of protests!



When FACEBOOK announced in a press release the other day that terms of use at the interactive social hub were being changed - and that content on the web site would be viewed as the property of the site providers - a thought crossed my mind.



"Oh, oh! Folks ain't gonna like that."



Curiously, over the past few days, I haven't heard a peep out of a multitude of Facebook-savvy "friends".



Have they been holding back on their "secret passionate thoughts" for fear FACEBOOK staff will squirrel 'em away for future posterity?



On the heels of that startling news - and the uproar that erupted thereafter on the blogosphere and throughout civilized parts of the known world - FACEBOOK did an about - um - face!



Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg assured concerned FACEBOOK members that the company was revising its policies this week in respect to the "Governing Document" which dictates the terms of use.



Feedback from the 170 million or so users at the trendy Internet watering hole is welcome, the pimply-faced CEO was quick to note for the record.



Some breathed a sigh of relief.



A content of a post on Zuckerberg's blog - during the throes of the controversy in recent days - disturbed die-hard fans, after all.



The chief's pollyanna attitude - "just trust us" - didn't fly with many!



But, there was a silver lining to the whole fiasco.



In the aftermath of the avalanche of protests, FACEBOOK has taken up the arduous task of zealously crafting a spirited "Bill of Rights" to facilitate the sharing of information in the future.



"We need a license in order to help share information with your friends, but we don't claim to own your information."



The way the unexpected "take over" of data came down - and was summarily abandoned by virtue of a hasty retreat - remains highly suspect to a posse of industry-insiders.



Harvard Professor Harry Lewis - who teaches in the field of Computer Science - was in accord with analysts who opined on the issue.



"People will have legitimate suspicions until they see the result."



Something tells me - no matter how the issue is ultimately resolved by FACEBOOK - that Big Brother is still watching.



Welcome to an Internet version of George Orwell's 1984.










http://www.julianayrs.com



Saturday, July 5, 2008

Dept. of Justice...considers racial profiling. U.S. to become fascist country!

Last Fourth of July to be truly free...



When I thumbed through the morning newspaper the other day and came across a report alleging that the Dept. of Justice is entertaining the idea of "racial profiling", I thought I plucked up the "ONION" Newspaper by mistake.

The report noted that the government is tinkering with new guidelines to allow the FBI to investigate Americans without any "evidence" of wrongdoing - allowing the agents instead - to rely solely on a "profile" that would put the spotlight on Muslims, Arabs and other racial and ethic groups.

Currently, agents of Law Enforcement require a specific reason - or proof that a law has been broken - in order to investigate U.S. Citizens and legal residents.

The new policy would permit the FBI to open preliminary terrorism investigations after they have sifted through public records and available intelligence and managed to sketch a profile of traits from the crumbs - that when taken as a whole - may be deemed suspicious and/or worthy of pursuing.

Sounds like the kind of sinister plot Adolf Hitler might hatch up in a bold-faced effort to secure the destiny of his perfect Aryan Race, don't 'ya think?

Heil George W. Bush!

From the get-go - no matter how you fathom it - the wild scheme is un-American.

We have only to recite the inscription on the base of the Statue of Liberty to get our bearings in this regard:

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Are we to amend that to read,

"Only if your a**ses are Lily white and foreign free?"

Notwithstanding, the whole "idea" flies in the face of the U.S. Constitution.

Does the Bush administration intend to toss the whole concept of "Due process of Law" out the window, too?

In that event, the presumption of innocence would be lost.

Golly, the Founding Fathers of this country must be turning over in their graves!

But, the Government's jaundiced view of things gets worse.

Factors that could make someone the subject of an investigation include travel to regions of the world known for terrorist activity and/or where there is access to weapons or military training.

In addition, a person's race or ethnicity would be a key factor in the decision to open up a clandestine investigation, too.

In fact, every citizen will be suspect under the new guidelines.

Whoa Nellie!

Are they daft?

The long and short of it?

I foresee a "controlled" society where the Nation's peoples - no matter their race, color, or creed - are not free by any stretch of the imagination.

Indeed - if any of the aforementioned guidelines are implemented - the U.S. may end up sliding down a slippery slope and along a dark and trecherous path to become a full-fledged fascist regime.

At that juncture - fear, suspicion, and uncertainty - will be rife around the Nation.

And, Americans will become the most-hated citizens of the world.

You can count on that, believe me.

If anything, I surmise terrorist threats will increase!

I also expect that there will be an uprising within unstable U.S. borders - and that just maybe - there may be an overthrow of the government, too.

One has only to look to the U.S. Constitution to understand why.

"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Understandably - once there is a loss of "domestic tranquility" and irreparable harm to the "general welfare" of the people - the citizenry will pay heed to the prophetic third sentence of the remarkable - "Declaration of Independence" - and demand a call to action.

"That to secure these rights [to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness], governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."

As Edward Abbey once said,

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country from his Government."

Amen!
 
coompax-digital magazine