3
Showing posts with label Free Speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Free Speech. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

San Francisco Public Library...security guards intimidate patrons! Try to silence critics!








In response to a post I published last week on the inappropriate conduct of library staff at the main library in San Francisco, security guards have attempted to intimate patrons in a bold-faced effort to silence their criticisms.

Post: 03/05/2011

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2011/03/san-francisco-public-librarydim-witted.html

For example, when I popped into the Library this morning to check the catalogue - near the express Internet computers locals and tourists check e-mail and conduct travel research at - a surly overweight African American female security guard shuffled over and started to glare at me (and others) from a standing position near the rail.

Lady, if you're trying to intimidate me - or silence my voice (quelch my right to free speech) - you're barking up the wrong tree!

I'll haul your sorry a** into court and make an example of you!

Amen!




Vacation marred by threatening security guards @ Public Library!

Thursday, October 21, 2010

AFI FEST...David Lynch denies right to free speech! Fest discriminates! Volates rights of press!







In true ironic style, David Lynch and Sir Howard Stringer will kick off the annual AFI Fest on Nov 4th - brimming with a bevy of films-  that will speak of truth, cry out for justice, and attempt to hail festival organizers as great humanitarian filmmakers out to raise the consciousness.

Bullshit!

It’s just a lot of hooey!

Uh-huh.

The lofty verbal diarrhea spewing forth from the AFI Fest headquarters in Hollywood (CA) is just a sleazy poorly-scripted heap of nonsense - tawdry fiction - served up on a silver platter by a posse of nefarious snake-oil salesmen like Lynch, Sir Howard Stringer (Sony), Bob Gazzalle (chief back-stabbing highway robber with his hands in the public coffers) out to hi-jack Washington’s gift to the American people for their own greedy, self-serving, political interests.

In a scant two days, David Lynch (in particular) established by virtue of his willful neglect of the pursuit of the truth and his deliberate failure to rectify a wrong - that he is not only a pitiful individual who actively attempts to diabolically silence free speech by dubious dishonest means - but also a scandalous phony inclined to trample on the rights of the free press and openly discriminate against decent members of the film community in a deceitful underhanded plot to bolster his flimsy reputation (checker-board at best) and those of the head honchos who do the dishonest bidding on behalf of the AFI Film Fest 2010.

When Lynch - and festival low-lifers such as Casey De La Rosa (PR), President & CEO Bob Gazzalle, and others - chose to discriminate against me and violate my rights (and quite generally fu** with my head as they to tried to twist a rusty old knife in my back and front) they crossed the proverbial line.

I intend to come out swinging - sue the bastards, if necessary - to toss a searing spotlight on their reprehensible conduct - and in the process - expose their shocking lack of moral rectitude - and corrupt old-boy network - on the world stage.

That’s what these disgraceful losers deserve - to be drawn-and-quartered and strung up by their girlie little balls in the town square - where decent members of the film community (who have also been snubbed by these elitist bums on a government payroll check and/or sponsor’s free ride) may be vindicated for all of the civilized world to feast their eyes on.

The disturbing conduct - that whipped me into a frenzy and resulted in a demoralizing melt-town this past week - was triggered by the outrageous mind-boggling stupidity of Casey De La Rosa - who was under the ludicrous impression that he could discriminate against me and violate my 1st amendment rights without so much as a whimper in protest.

WRONG!

When the evil machinations of De La Rosa reared their ugly head yesterday - out-of-the-blue - it was evident some skulduggery and behind-the-scenes manipulation from the likes of oddball David Lynch, ego-maniac Bob Gazzalle - and just maybe - a handful of phony baloney AFI snobs (headed up by Edward Zwick and Sir Howard Stringer) nodding their nasty approval from a rotten perch on the sidelines in the shadowy world of sleaze that is the underbelly of their corrupt Hollywood presence in the otherwise respected realms of inspiring film industry.

It should be noted for the record that since I became a fairly well-known film critic - I have covered the AFI fest for past two years in Los Angeles (and in Dallas) - with a two-pronged purpose.

For starters, I have always endeavored to provide informative intelligent critiques on film with the specific aim of shedding light on theatrical releases so that - ultimately - I may guide my loyal readers safely through a field of landmines (bombs) that would otherwise put a dent in the pocketbook.

In addition, it has also been a mission of mine to toss a spotlight on emerging talent - and thus - usher their creative gifts into the mainstream where their creative musings can be better appreciated in venues that have the capacity to bolster their status (and a sincere appreciation for their projects) in the community-at-large.

Without doubt, I have single-handed provided a wealth of press coverage to the AFI Fest over the past two years, which has  contributed to the overall success of the annual event.

For a sampling of these reports follow the links posted herein below.

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/06/mike-nicolsafi-life-achievement-award.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/search?q=AFI&updated-max=2009-03-25T07%3A17%3A00-07%3A00&max-results=20

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/10/afi-festkicks-off-with-meryl-streep-in.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/10/afi-festivaldavid-lynch-guest-artistic.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/11/afi-festtilda-swintons-julia-role-of.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/afi-fest-2009george-clooney-premieres.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/afi-fest-2009george-clooney-premieres.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/06/afi-festivalcalling-for-film.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/02/slumdog-millionaireafi-foresaw.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/12/afiannounces-10-best-films-tv-programs.html

Post:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/04/afi-dallasadrien-brody-lou-gossett-jr.html

Unfortunately, at the tail end of the AFI Fest last year, I suffered a personality clash with the manager of the publicity department who has since left the organization (see specific details below).

Because I perceive my role as a multi-faceted one in which I not only pen movie reviews and conduct celebrity interviews,  but also,  report on the scuttlebutt behind-the-scenes (informative tidbits on the hits and misses)  I was  inclined to write an expose on John Wildman and his abuse of power, corruptions, mistreatment of the press, and what-have-you.

Post:  10/01/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/11/afi-festpublicity-director-john-wildman.html

Post: 10/31/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/10/afi-festjohn-wildman-publicity-director.html

Of course, the expose  caused a tempest in a teapot to erupt - at which point - Wildman embarked on a nasty crusade to deny me access to films, attendance at gala events, you name it.

I took the high road, however, and maintained my dignity throughout his attempts to assassinate my reputation with his superiors and key players in the film industry in attendance at the Festival.

Of course, I published another post, in which I focused on his heinous mean-spirited conduct, with the specific aim of exposing Mr. Wildman for the low-class  piece of kaka that he was.

Post:  10/31/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/afi-feststaff-rude-to-press-elitism.html

Shortly thereafter, when the festival wrapped, Mr. Wildman - and two other reps at the AFI Festival - resigned in a cloud of mystery.

The Los Angeles Times reported on this intriguing turn-of-events.

At this juncture, I contacted the AFI Festival Director’s office, to determine if the resignation of Wildman was reported accurately.

When the assistant to the Festival Director promptly assured me by e-mail communication - that Mr. Wildman had ( indeed) left his post - I informed the AFI that in view of the departure of Mr. Wildman I would resume covering their events and throwing much-appreciated publicity their way.

When it came to my attention that the deadline for applying for a press pass for this year’s festival - slated to run November 4th thru November 11th - I immediately contacted the publicity department by e-mail to secure credentials for the upcoming 7-day event.

In the interim, I published a couple of posts to enlighten my readers that the festival was - not only on the horizon-  but scheduled to screen a handful of quality films they might be interested in catching.

Post:  10/18/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/10/afi-fest-2010david-lynch-presents-world.html

In particular, I underscored that for the 1st time ever, David Lynch would take on the role of a “guest” Artistic Director.

Post:  10/06/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/10/afi-festivaldavid-lynch-guest-artistic.html

I also proceeded to pen articles on specific projects that would be unveiled at AFI which included feature articles on Werner Herzog, special gala events, and-so-forth and-so-on.

Post: 10/18/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/10/werner-herzogcave-documentary-to-screen.html

As evidenced above, and by virtue of the links provided, I have established - without doubt - that I have selflessly promoted the AFI Fest on over a dozen occasions over the past two years.

And, one has only to review the body of the posted features (provided by link) to verify that about ninety percent of my press coverage has always been glowing, supportive, and prone to praise the filmmakers, the fest organizers, and the celebrities who appeared on the carpet to promote their projects, etc. etc.

In spite of this, the Festival turned around and reneged on their promise to issue a press pass, pursuant to an e-mail communication on October 14th (2010).

For example, a few days after I was informed that my press pass would be forthcoming, yesterday morning (about a week later), Casey De La Rosa the (head of publicity who took over the post previously held by John Wildman) fired off an e-mail in which he curtly informed me that my press pass was being revoked.

On what grounds?

In the terse two-line communication, Casey De La Rosa informed me  that he “stumbled” on my scathing expose on John Wildman - and for this reason - was denying me access to the press room, gala events, and red carpet interviews!

I was particularly incensed by this disturbing piece of news, because I already made plans to return to Los Angeles to cover the event Nov. 4th thru Nov. 11th.

Moreover, once I started to receive press releases, I jumped into action  and proceeded to pen a couple of feature reports on Mr. Lynch, the movies being screened,  detailed information on the festival, how to secure tickets, and what-have-you.

Post: 10/18/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/10/afi-fest-2010david-lynch-presents-world.html

Ungrateful bastards, wouldn’t you agree?

But what really got my goat was Casey De La Rosa’s refusal  to provide contact information I required to lodge a formal complaint with Mr. Lynch, the AFI Board of Directors, AUDI sponsors, and Sir Howard Stringer (Chairman who heads up Son  who is always hitting up the media for free publicity and glowing tributes to bolster his ego and feather his corrupt nest).

In fact, in spite of the fact the request was sent out day-before-yesterday, Casey De La Rosa has refused to respond with the e-mail contacts.

Since the AFI Fest is a non-profit organization - originally founded by a former President on the White House lawn a few decades ago - Mr. De La Rosa (I use the term Mister very loosely) I have been denied the information I am entitled to by law.

Are the e-mail addresses (or snail mail contacts by U.S. Post) a state secret, Mr. De La Rosa?

I hardly think so.

Also, an e-mail communication to David Lynch - guest Festival Director - has also been ignored by the top dog at the AFI Fest 2010 - thereby establishing his lack of courtesy to the press and his shocking lack of professionalism.

Or, is Mr. Lynch hiding, because it is evident to any fool that a review of Mr. De La Rosa’s reprehensible conduct establishes that he not only sought to “silence my voice” -but deny  free speech rights guaranteed under the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

In sum, he discriminated against me, and violated my rights in the process.

For example - initially my press pass was approved - on the grounds that I established my writing capabilities and status in the film community.

Thereafter, when De La Rosa (and Lynch?) were enlightened about the expose on John Wildman, they elected to revoke the privilege.

In view of the foregoing, it is has been legally established that Lynch and the AFI and De La Rosa have attempted to censor me - and silence my voice in the process - in violation of the right to free speech.

In view of the fact the AFI was founded by the Government - to provide a forum for film in the U.S. - David Lynch, De La Rosa, Howard Stringer et al - are illegally denying me my right to access in my capacity as a member of the press (or independent party).

Further, they are in breach of their mission as a non-profit - which is  backed by the government - because they have openly discriminated against me (i.e., treated me differently than other press members who abide by their arm-twisting tactics - or in the alternative - have written positive stories possibly prompted by gifts and payola?).

No matter how ‘ya cut it, the AFI Fest is an incestuous corrupt organization rife with unintelligent elitist snobs out to rob the arts community of their rightful entitlement to full access to the 7-day event without censorship or a requirement that they mention sponsor such as AUDI in AFI press coverage.

Shame on David Lynch, Casey De La Rosa, Sir Howard Stringer, Bob Gazzalles, Zwick, and Mike Nichols, and others involved with the AFI Fest who are responsible for this outrageous inappropriate conduct, which smacks of a form of extortion.
http://www.thetazzler.biz/






John Wildman former PR Manager at AFI Fest


Saturday, October 16, 2010

DONATIONS






 DONATIONS
&
STORY SUGGESTIONS


BACKGROUND INFO
ON
JULIAN AYRS & THE TATTLER


For approximately three years, the Tattler has been publishing informative features on the Internet (which I trust have been enlightening too) under the auspices of google's highly-ranked forum:

http://www.blogspot.com/

Just prior to the rewarding stint on the far-reaching www - after a ten-year writer’s block - I got my feet wet “blogging” (an icky term I despise) on a Fox website the top brass at the underdog Network set up to complement an innovative reality show - “On the Lot” - which focused on filmmakers in competition for prizes each week.

Though Fox’s foray into the snobby realms of film was short-lived, the heady hands-on experience (and subsequent publicity that followed in its wake) garnered me a lot fame (and notoriety) nonetheless.

The daily reports ran the gamut from titillating Hollywood gossip, to controversial social commentary, relaxing travel and leisure suggestions, the environmental issues, even a calendar of community events.

CONTRIBUTIONS

Now, regular readers of the Tattler (and visitors who sporadically cruise by the site) may get more actively involved by submitting a story idea to the Editor for consideration.


In the alternative, supporters may pledge their support with a cash donation to help defray the costs involved with publishing daily posts at "The Tattler" blog where the truly free creative spirit reins.

CONTACT

Story Suggestions


Attention
Julian Ayrs
Editor & Publisher


i.julian@blogspot.com


Donations

Pay Pal or Snail Mail

Pay Pal

(online payments)

Payee
Julian Ayrs


http://www.ijulian.blogspot.com

Snail Mail
(checks)

Attention
Julian Ayrs
Editor & Publisher
The Tattler
8424 Santa Monica Blvd.
Suite No. A251
West Hollywood, CA
90069
USA


Friends, countrymen, Bloggers!





Monday, October 4, 2010

Google...hires staff to improve Chinese relations!






In a bold-faced effort to appease the Chinese - and lift a spectre of mistrust that currently hovers over relations with Officials in that Nation over censorship issues - global giant Google has increased its work force by twenty percent to better address government relationships.

Although google still maintains a license for operation and a structure to service users in China, their footing remains unstable, in the aftermath of a clash over google's high-flying style and launch of a host of services in that rapidly expanding market.

Meanwhile, the hiring of additional staff in the advertising sector, appears to be sending a signal from the Mountain View company offices that it's all business as usual.

A spokesperson at google has acknowledged a continuing effort to land advertising accounts in China in spite of the climate of uncertainty that presently prevails.





Can google crack the great wall?

Sunday, October 3, 2010

COICA...Senators move for Internet blacklists! End to free speech on web!







A group of Senators with clout on both sides of the political fence are rallying to expand the Government's authority to censor the Internet.

The "Combating Online Infringement & Counterfeits Act" was slyly presented to law-makers in late September - and according to insiders on-the-hill - is ready to rock 'n roll.

First up on the agenda?

A hearing before the Judiciary Committee.

Opponents are crying foul on the grounds that U.S. Citizens may soon find themselves joining Iranians and Chinese in the hapless ranks of those being blocked from accessing broad chunks of the public Internet.

COICA, if enacted, would create two blacklists consisting of Internet domain names.

The Courts would be granted the power to add sites to the first COICA enforcementlist ; the Attorney General, control over a second.

Internet service providers and others (everyone from Comcast to PayPal to Google AdSense) would be required to block any domains on the first list.

The entities would also receive immunity (and the presumed good favor of the government) if they also blocked domains on the second list.

The lists are for sites "dedicated to infringing activity".

For example, any domain name where counterfeit goods or copyrighted material are "central to the activity of the Internet site" could be blocked.

If you read between the lines, under current U.S. Law, pop culture sites like - YouTube - could be censored because US. Copyright holders like Viacom have argued that copyrighted material is central to their activity.

YouTube is perfectly legal - currently - as long as they take down copyrighted material when they're informed about the Violation.

If COICA passes, critics are concerned that Viacom wouldn't need to prove "wrong-doing" by YouTube to shut the site down.

Lawyers would only have to persuade the courts that a significant number of people were using the "YouTube" web-site to infringe on copyrights.

Failing that road of pursuit, Viacom could petition the DOJ to put the social hub on the second blacklist, and encourage ISPs to block it even without a court order.

According to opponents, ISPs have ample reason to abide by the will of the powerful DOJ, even if the law doesn't formally require them to do so.

In the final analysis, COICA's passage may be a tremendous blow to free speech on the Internet.

Those who are opposed to that end scenario, therefore, need to sit up and take action.



Wednesday, December 16, 2009

WordPress...discriminates! Engages in unlawful censorship & Violates blogger rights!



In the beginning there was the word!
(WordPress under false impression they created it)





Over at WordPress bloggers are grumbing that management is "playing God" - the end result being - that the privilege to post an article may be unjustly denied without proper legal notice simply because an individual in the employ of the blog site doesn't agree with what the author has penned at their site.

Also, because of WordPress's lack knowledge  in respect to binding State & Federal laws, bloggers have suffered the loss of the rights guaranteed them under the1st Amendment and the Bill of Rights..

Specifically - the highly unethical & illegal conduct of staff at Wordpress - not only amounts to a denial of the right to free speech - but also the right to due process (a fair hearing).

I suppose this is what happens when a gaggle of computer geeks start up a company without a clue!

Well, they may be in for a rude life-shattering shock.

One blogger I am in touch with is inclined to file a lawsuit for damages!

How do you like them apples, dudes?

News at 11!


Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Germany...forced speech. Bloggers comply or face fines!


I have heard of free speech, but forced speech?

The startling news astounded when it first streaked like lightning around German websites in recent days.

The public library system was going to force every blogger and website to submit material for their digital library files or face a potential fine of $12,700 (U.S. Funds).

Turns out, the "thought police" were not in an arm-twisting mode, at all.

Not yet, anyway.

In a bid to document "pop culture" on the world-wide-web in a digital format for future reference, officials have been painstakingly selecting specific material from a handful of websites that are presumably representative of "voices" on the net.

To ensure the project is completed without a hitch, the Government took the unusual precaution of legislating applicable penalties that may be levied against any blogger or net surfer inclined to object to use of material.

It appears that the Government may be taking a nod from Europeana - the new European Union digital library - which has been actively digitalizing 2m books, recordings, and paintings and films for their files.

The archives may be helpful to researchers in the future who may want to take a reliable peek into cultures from earlier ages - no matter how advanced or primitive - and at break-neck speed.


When the Europeana digital library went live last month, the site promptly crashed.

No wonder.

They're boasting a staggering 10 million hits a month from around the globe.

The beauty of the digital library is its permanency.

Currently, the information highway offers up no guarantees.

Internet pages shut down, for instance, as bloggers close-out their accounts and start fresh elsewhere.

Because technology will leap ahead, too - documentation of the "dark ages" in the "wild" on the Internet - may be of interest too.

So, there is an ongoing effort to coral that data.

A U.S. based archive is currently involved in an ambitious effort to collect data on these shores, but the task is monumental.

And, there is the question of storage space.

So - have libraries prioritized data collection at this point in time - or are scholars going about the project willy-nilly?

Where do a blogger's daily ramblings rank in the scheme of things, for instance.

"We don't have any predefined criteria," noted Rory McLeod, the British Library's digital preservation manager.

"The library captures large slices of the web, but what is important to retain is the Internet's changing technological specifications so that future researchers can reconstruct them."

My vision for the future?

A holograph library!

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Bloggers...under "big tent" at Democratic National Convention!

Blogger keyboards at the ready...

Some have been grumbling at the Democratic National Convention that bloggers don't get any respect.

But, you've come a long way, newbie!

At the convention in 2004, those who loved to "post-it" in the blogosphere were issued press credentials, granted.

And, allowed to mingle with the elite in the mainstream media.

But, the relations were strained a tad.

At the Dems' big bash this year, illustrious bloggers have not only been given the "green light" for access to all the relevant (and not so relevant) political events, but given asylum - if you will - under a "big tent".

The grandiose digs herald a new dawn for Internet pundits who have gained momentum and power in recent days on the political landscape.

Just ask Obama and Clinton - who are still stinging from a spiteful blogger's word-stalking - on the campaign trail in recent days.

Although blogsters were required to cough up one hundred bucks for their credentials, the joyride include wi-fi access, free burritos, and never-ending kegs of beer to wash the high-protein snack down with.

Heh, they're making out like bandits in Denver.

I'd better hop on a plane, pronto, and join the fray!

But, there have been some glitches in communication - in spite of the state-of-the-art presence of gizmos provided by two generous sponsors - Google and Digg.

When MSNBC tried to hand over the reigns to a newsie in-the-field for coverage on the blog presence at the Democratic Convention this morning, a number of technical difficulties delayed broadcast of the reports.

The anchor man joked,

"This is all the way from the Bloggers' camp in the Ukraine, so the feed is slow."

In view of the way some of the legit high-powered media types treat 'em, they may as well be!

All kidding aside, the bloggers appear to be happy as clams in their comfy digs.

One web writer noted on-camera that the free-standing canvas facility provided an independent base for their cerebral musings to emanate freely from.

No, sir!

This savvy blogster didn't intend to be influenced - nor did he plan to kow-tow to - the Democratic machine spinning their own wheels just outside the tent flaps.

Google and Digg sponsored the 8,000 square foot facility which includes a theatre, lots of leading-edge gizmos, and all the blogger interaction you could imagine in your wildest web-surfing dreams.

But, what will the talking heads produce, I wonder.

I'll be cruising the net this evening to take a gander.

Let's hope what Barbara Ehrenreich once opined is not true:

"We who officially value freedom of speech above life itself seem to have nothing to talk about but the weather."

Democratic National Convention...100 protesters arrested!


Depending on who you talk to, a melee that erupted last night in Denver which resulted in one hundred arrests, was due to either overzealous cops or unruly mobs who would not disperse.

The protesters allege that an angry battalion of police officers approached their peaceful perch at a park just a hop-and-a-skip from the Sheraton Hotel in downtown Denver, exploded tear gas in their midst, and hauled them away for simply exercising their right to free speech.

Law Enforcement issued a statement to the contrary.

Denver cops alleged that they were responding to tips from intelligence reports - that protesters planned to disrupt fundraising events at a handful of the local Hotels - with the express purpose of throwing a damper on the Democrat's premier party underway at the Democratic National Convention.

Although approximately one hundred protestors were originally placed in cuffs and carted off to the County Jail, thirty were later released without incident.

The balance of the protestors were released on bond and face charges stemming from alleged unruly assembly, failing to disperse, and possibly resisting arrest.

Originally, hundreds of thousands of protesters were expected to attend the rally.

Cynics on the sidelines chided that at last count the numbers tallied in the "hundreds of hundreds".

The protesters are expected to gather again later today.

Some wonder aloud,

Will the ranks swell in view of last night's outrageous show of force by the Denver pigs?

News at 11!

Friday, August 8, 2008

George Bush...musters up ba**s to criticize Chinese Government!

U.S. Embassy transparent...


On the occasion of the unveiling of the $434 million-dollar U.S. Embassy in Beijing, President Bush surprised quite a few folks when he slyly jumped on the opportunity to criticize China's continued acts of repression within its borders.

Once the dedication ceremonies were underway - and the President had basically taken care of the Nation's business - he was inclined to expound on his thoughts about free speech.

"We strongly believe societies which allow free expression of ideas tend to be the most prosperous and the most peaceful."

When you consider his remarks were made on Chinese soil - well - it was a pretty ba**sy thing to do.

Now - I expect - they'll cut 'em off and serve them up as a delicacy!

But, Hail to the Chief, anyway.

The Foreign Minister was quick to put the PREZ in his lowly place, though.

"We firmly oppose any words or acts which interfere in other countries' internal affairs, using human rights and religion and other issues."

If the President's motorcade disappears, we'll know just how much of an affront the remarks were to the Chinese.

And, one more thing, George.

Get yourself a food taster you can trust, real fast!

Bush speaks in Beijing as Barack Obama looks on...

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Associated Press...Monopoly of the news is un-American. Technorati bans AP!




There has been quite a fall-out against AP in the wake of their attacks on the DRUDGE report for alleged illegal misuse of quoted material and news clips.

Many blog sites are banning Associated Press from their band widths.

In recent days, AP big-wigs pointed an accusing finger at DRUDGE for linking up to their news reports and providing short quotations via reader submissions.

According to Tech Crunch, DRUDGE is doing nothing more that what Digg, TechMeme, Mixx and dozens of other sites do.

Obviously, because DRUDGE is the big honcho on the block - who savors a widespread influence in his capacity as an innovative news outlet on the world-wide-web - AP has elected to either ding him for the privilege of using their musings - or in the alternative, at least - shut him down altogether.

In the wake of the controversy, Technorati - numero uno blog spot on the planet - has banned Associated Press from their band widths altogether.

For good reason.

AP does not want people quoting their stories despite the fact that such activity very clearly falls within the fair use exception to copyright law.

As long as bloggers and reporters from news outlets give proper credit for the quotes, there should not be any problem, in my humble opinion.

If Associated Press labels the fair use activity as an infringement, then I say bullsh**.

In essence, AP is trying to secure a monopoly on the news.

And, in my estimation, that is un-American.

Notwithstanding, it should be noted that on any occasion that I have ever "chosen" to quote AP myself, it amounted to "throwing a bone" their way.

Because I attempt to give a balanced view of the news, I often include a myriad of viewpoints from a handful of news sources to add depth and dimension to the report. If ever I quoted AP, it was because I chose to, not because there was any pressing need for their material.

Personally, I can survive quite nicely without Associated Press.

If anything - they are stuffy and old guard and are ham-strung in many respects when they report on their white bread "news" - anyway.

A.P. Vice President Jim Kennedy says they will issue guidelines telling bloggers what is acceptable and what isn't over and above what the law says is acceptable.

Over your dead news organization!

He had the audacity to note for the record that AP intends to "define clear standards as to how much of its articles and broadcasts bloggers and web sites can excerpted without infringing on the AP copyright".

Boy, he's full of himself, isn't he?

Kennedy went on to warn that those who disregard the guidelines risk being sued by the AP even if those guidelines are in direct conflict with applicable Laws.

In my mind's eye, their downfall is surely on the way.

Who needs 'em?

Bloggers, blog sites, and Internet Web news sites are proliferating, and gaining respect and stature in the news industry; but, more importantly, are changing the face of the news arena daily.

In the near future, AP will be turning to bloggers for news stories!

Are the blogsters going to let 'em use the material?

The jury is still out.

Meanwhile, bloggers and blog sites are turning their backs on Associated Press.

AP is banned until they abandon their lunatic strategy.

Likewise, Bloggers will no longer quote 'em or link to 'em or even acknowledge their petty meaningless existence.

Voltaire once said,

We have a natural right to make use of our pens as of our tongue, at our peril, risk and hazard.
 
coompax-digital magazine