3
Showing posts with label Anderson Cooper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anderson Cooper. Show all posts

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Cairo...Cradle of Civilization erupts in violent turmoil! Mubarak vows to hang on! Barbara Walters blames U.S.!


 


Adams on Page Six says bad dye job must go, too!





The world watched on in horror as horrific images of the violence - which resulted in untold bloodshed and cries for Egypt's President Mubarak to resign - flashed across their TV screens last night.

At home, U.S. citizens were literally numbed, as they wondered aloud why Washington was so slow to take action or at least call for Mubarak to step down.

Political pundits on the evening News argued that Egypt had been a good friend and a staunch ally over the years - but in view of the eye-of-the-storm unfolding in Cairo yesteday - were quick to lament to all within earshot that "enough was enough".

Power-players on the World Financial scene were a little more complacent about the disturbing turn-of-events, though.

When asked - Rupert Murdoch - was brutally frank.

"The Arabs must take care of the Arabs," he calmly stated for the record on one news network scrambling for answers.

Interviewer "flavor of the month" - Piers Morgan - was inclined to trot out Barbara Walters for her take on the Egyptian crisis.

"You were there at the beginning, Barbara. What do you think?"

In sum, Walters felt that it was the fault of the U.S. for giving safe haven to dictators once they fell from grace.

The legendary News Icon cited the Shaw of Iran - and his short exile in the U.S. - as an example.

The answer in the final analysis?

U.S-style Democracy, of course, assert a posse of opportunists on the hill and elsewhere.

But, during the course of the evening in Cairo, it was evident that U.S. intervention might not be that well-received by Egyptians.

In fact, at one point, one Journalist on the scene - Anderson Cooper - was viciously attacked by an angry mob who shouted their disapproval of reporters and U.S. interlopers in the scheme of things.

"We hate Americans," angry Egyptians ranted.

Boy, were they out for blood.

Earlier in the day, it appeared there might be an accord, however.

At one juncture, the protestors and Murabak supporters set down their arms, and attempted a peaceful assembly.

Suddenly, without warning, a gang of thugs on Camels and horses galloped into Tahrir Square - now known as Liberation Square - and began to whip the protestors at whim and without mercy.

Some speculated that the attackers were employees of the Egyptian Museum - situated a scant distance away - who were bent on venting their anger on the upstarts for ruining the tourist trade over the course of the past week or so.

Once the melee broke out, it continued long into the weary night, in a death-to-the-end battle of fists and brute might.

Although protestors were searched before entering the square, to ensure there were not carrying any arms, the anti-establishment protestors were inventive enough in the heat of the conflict to scoop up rocks and bits of metal and craft them into primitive weapons which proved to be quite effective in lashing back throughout the battle that ensued.

News anchor Brian Williams compared the ugly conflict to squirmishes in the Iraq War.

"It was like a downtown Baghdad-style barrage hit," he recalled to one anxious reporter covering the unfolding drama.

Indeed, both sides vowed to fight for their cause at all cost - in a historical region of Egypt - that Williams referred to as the very cradle of Civilization.

Meanwhile, Washington was inclined to hold the fort - which irked some - needless to say.

When the crisis escalated to outright chaos in the streets, a spokesperson for President Obama finally put in an appearance at the podium in Washington, and urged that President Mubarak step down from his post.

However, the President - once revered and loved by a majority of the Egyptian people - refused to kow-tow to U.S. opinion.

In fact, Muburak was quite adamant that he would not only see out his term, but die on Egyptian soil if necessary.

In spite of the melee - and a heart-wrenching day of turmoil - many Egyptians stood behind Muburak.

"No one can run this country like Murabak. It's like Saddam in Iraq. When Saddam was gone, no one else could run the country. We don't want our country destroyed," one taxi driver excitedly blurted out to one reporter at a high-profile news organization.

Some worry that a "Muslim Brotherhood" will gain a foothold in Egypt if the President is forced out right now - and ultimately complicate complex politcal matters in the Middle East - thus encouraging interests detrimental to the U.S.

Others accused President Muburak of being two-faced.

Critics allege that goon squads comprised of Police Officers in plain clothes were paid paltry sums to fan out into Liberation Square and attack the protestors - beat them down - if necessary.

And, all the while, Mubarak wore another mask to the world-at-large, professing his innocence.

Meanwhile, the military appeared to be attempting to maintain the status quo, if anything.

Witnesses to the events were quick to point out that early on - when the first violent outbreaks occurred - that the the soldiers acted with restraint and only fired-off warning shots to signal their readiness to take action if things got out-of-hand.

At five o'clock this morning the protestors and President Murabak's supporters were still jockeying for power (and licking their wounds).

News agencies have reported that there have been at least five deaths and hundreds injured during the course of the political upheaval yesterday (with no apparent end of the conflict in sight).

News at 11!

http://www.thetattler.biz


Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Anderson Cooper...Broadway debut! Daniel Radcliffe takes bow in classic!




Studly Coop debuts on Broadway!
 


 


That Silver Fox - Anderson Cooper - is launching a stage-acting debut on Broadway in a revival of the classic Broadway hit:

"How To Succeed in Business Without Really Trying"

Well, not exactly in the flesh.

Though, fans of the pint-size News Anchor, get all hot and bothered at the thought!

Mr. Cooper recorded the Book "Voice" for an advice-giving narrator (a character who is actually never seen on stage) which starts previews at the Big Apple's Al Hirschfield Theatre in the next few weeks.

Coop was quick to underscore that his "night job" on CNN keeps him out of the loop for the most part - when it comes to acting - that is (dudes at the gym may offer up a bone of contention on that issue and will tattle otherwise if the rumor-mills are true).

So, this nifty assignment dove-tailed nicely with his work load.

I expect - that a handful of fans (hot-to-trot) were disappointed when they caught sight of Cooper in an interview with Piers Morgan recently - though.

In that one-on-one sizzler (yawn!) the camera-man made the mistake of taking a two-shot from the side which ended up dwarfing Gloria Vanderbilt's son (yeah, he was born into big bucks) next to TV's new super-star interviewer of the month.

The musical stars another notable by the name of Daniel Radcliffe.

Uh-huh!

I expect that the Harry Potter star will sell out the box-office, eh?

More later!

http://www.thetattler.biz/



Thursday, August 12, 2010

Terrorist Babies...Anderson Cooper goes off deep-end! CNN credibility in dumper!






Silver fox brooding alot these days!

 



I shook my head in disblief when I caught the Anderson Cooper report on "terrorist babies" on CNN the other night..

Coop must be either desperate for controversial issues to chase down to keep the ratings revving up - or, just maybe - he's heading toward a melt down.

His tenacious full-frontal attack on the subject was baffling!

Frankly, the wild notion should have been "dropped" like a hot potato, because it can't help but taint the name and reputation of anyone who chooses to pursue the looney-tunes scenario that's been drummed by unknown individuals to add to the hysteria about illegal immigrants and their alleged intentions.

If 'ya missed the bizarre in-depth probe (!) by Anderson, here's what went down in a nutshell.

When it came to Cooper's attention that Texas State Rep. Debbie Riddle (R-Tomball) was alleging to all within earshot that there was a plot involving pregnant women to have their unborn children delivered in U.S. hospitals to lay the ground-work for future terrorist attacks - instead of letting common sense prevail - Cooper dove in full-throttle.

For example, when it was obvious early on that Debbie Riddle was not a credible witness, he should have moved on.

In the segment, Riddle was not only evasive in respect to many of her responses, but prone to hide behind so-called un-named former FBI contacts, in order to bolster her bizarre allegations when pushed against the wall by pit-bull reporter Anderson Cooper.

It should have been obvious to Coop that Riddle was full of sh**, too, when she withrew her cooperation on-camera on the grounds that she was not informed in preliminary preparations for the report that Anderson Cooper was going to "grill" her so vigorously on air (in spite of the "fact" her office was still in the process of investigating the details).

Hooey!

From my perch here, Riddle's conduct was pretty suspect.

Only a fool would have pursued the matter further, but Anderson Coooper chose to plow on, and just about went down with the ship in the process in my estimation.

Cooper, the whole idea of a woman having a child in a U.S. hospital - with the specific intent of spirting the young one to foreign soil to be raised as a terrorist (then, installed in a cell twenty years later to attack the Nation from inside) is patently ridiculous on its face.

In the final analysis, Anderson obviously needs therapy for shell shock, because he's totally lost it!



Saturday, July 24, 2010

Anderson Cooper...Blogger Bashing! Factualism, please...






Anderson Cooper was tenacious when it came to reporting on the BP Oil Spill crisis - in fact - he reminded me of a scrappy lttle pit bull when he nipped at the heels of the execs at the beleaguered global entity and politicians on Washington Hill.

Quite the thorough reporter, the silver-haired "Daddy" - known to squire around a handsome male stud or two in the Village in NYC - managed to attack from all fronts and rustle up a bit of crow for a disgruntled few to chow down on.

Andy was definitely on the rag the other night, with a bone to pick when it came to the subject of  - ahem - Internet journalists.

"Are blogs driving the conversation?" - was the night's lament - as Coop continued to blast the blogosphere throughout the course of what amounted to a hysterical news report.

The tirade was prompted by revelations about a dim-witted blogger (Andrew Breitbart) and the controversy that erupted over "context" and how it dovetails (or doesn't) with the concept of ethics in journalism.

"It's all about hits," a disgusted Cooper uttered up - as he pointed a lily-white finger at B-level Bloggers ("B" for bombastic) - foaming at-the-mouth around the country.

Rightly so, Anderson criticized the practice of some to post just about anything - half-truths, lies, fabricated evidence - with the specific aim of drumming up mighty traffic and fifteen minutes of fame.

Although the scorn was well-grounded in reality, it was much ado about nothing, when you reflect on the obvious.

Once a journalist or lowly blogger loses his or her credibility, the game is over!

Surely Anderson recalls the cautionary tale about the boy who cried wolf?

An "out-of-context" video-tape, photo, or recording may be used for a story provided it doesn't seek to mislead, give a false impression, and/or distort the truth.
.
I, for one, often facilitate old clips, but they're generally woven in to effect a satire, send-up, or sly poke at the individual.

Years ago, folks thought Tom Cruise was a control-freak, when he demanded that journalists only use profile materials (tape recording, still photographs, quips from dog-eared magazine articles) that were gleaned from an interview agreed to.

For good reason.

People change, go through transformations, and - hopefully - experience spiritual growth along the way.

A writer who offers up a ten-year-old quote -and infers that it is the subject's current frame of mind - is unethical and dishonest.

In contrast, a writer who is upfront and honest, will properly reference the material  to ensure there are no misunderstandings.

As Anderson Cooper sees it, it all boils down to factualism.

Rightly so!

In respect to the issue of "hits" and "traffic", his criticism is out-of-line.

Doesn't CNN care one iota about his "hits" (ratings)?

You're only fooling yourself, Anderson, if you think otherwise.



Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Anderson Cooper...Silver Fox to seek lair @ CBS! Rumors persist...






On the airwaves this morning, disc jockeys were chatting each other up over an alleged insider "tip" that Anderson Cooper - a mainstay over at CNN for a handful of years now - may fly the coop!

Was the initial invite for Anderson Cooper to contribute to 60 Minutes (the CBS flagship ratings-getter) a sly overture to pave the way for the "Silver Fox" to transition his way over to the competing network?

Some say, yes!

According to pulse-takers and media watchdogs, CBS News executives have their sights set on the handsome bachelor, who has an apparent festish for work-out gyms and wet spandex tightie-whities.

Post:  06/06/08

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/06/anderson-cooperunderwear-fetish-gay.html

With a foot in the door now, it's just a matter of time before Anderson may choose to casually seque into a full-fledged role shaping the news format at CBS by way of an anchor post.

Some astute observers have noted over the past twenty-four hours that Katie Couric’s contract expires in a year or so - and that the time is ripe - to approach the rising media star stirring up ratings at CNN.

His high-profile coverage of the Haiti disaster hasn't been anything to sniff at, for starters.

Although a meeting allegedly took place months ago, some naysayers are pooh-poohing the notion that there is a behind-the-scenes play for Anderson to sign on the dotted line.

Some sources are boldly conjecturing that CBS Executives are pining for Mr. Cooper to replace Ms. Couric.

That sword works both ways for CBS.

Even if Cooper is not interested in jumping ship - any activity (surreptitious or otherwise) that hints negotiations are underway - may force Katie Couric's hand!

Meanwhile, CNN appears to be putting out fires in the wake of the media storm.

"The rumors that Cooper recently met with CBS News regarding an anchor position are false," a spokesperson at CNN asserted in so many words at the beginning of the week.

"He is not engaged in any additional conversations with them (CBS) beyond those necessary for his continuing role on 60 Minutes," he added with finality.

Will the grey-haired wonder utter up a comment or two to set the record straight?

News at 11!



Thursday, July 16, 2009

Barack Obama...double-talk with Anderson Cooper signals slick Barry typical politician!




A large number of Americans tuned in the other night to 360 on CNN to catch the one-on-one historical interview Anderson Cooper conducted with the Prez on his jaunt overseas to Ghana.

On that auspicious occasion, many voters may have caught Barack Obama transform into a bona fide politician right before their eyes, as Cooper tried to pin the Commander-in-Chief down on key issues.

But, it proved to be a slippery task, even for the political-savvy news reporter!

For example, when Cooper (a gay man) queried (no pun intended) Obama about the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy in the Military - and his subsequent promise to end that antiquated stance on homosexuality in the ranks - Barack responded in true political style.

"Because the policy was enacted into law," Obama hedged, "I can't very well ask the Military not to enforce it."

At this juncture, the camera panned to a blank stare on Anderson's face.

Then, there was a deafening silence for a moment or two.

With a few carefully chosen words Barack managed to pick up the slack.

"Of course, I intend to take some action on that issue later on," he noted for the record or in words to that effect.

Ironically, his response was just as "on the fence" as the policy itself.

Yup.

Just like a true politician, Barack is now trying to appease both sides.

Consequently, the popular Prez is forced to talk out both sides of his mouth.

In the final analysis, Barack has blossomed into a full-fledged corrupt politician!

In fact, his wishy-washy maneuverings have started to smack a lot like those of slick Willy before him.

Slick Barry?

Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

Next, I expect the candidate for change will be saying he's never inhaled.

'Til now - Obama has managed to keep his di** in his pants - though.

With those of the female persuasion, at least.

Meanwhile, another issue rears its ugly - um - head!

How long is the Prez going to refuse to respond to the gay rumors running rampant on the blogosphere?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Just ask the "Globe".



http://www.julianayrs.com

Friday, June 6, 2008

Anderson Cooper...underwear fetish? Weekend Gay Pride special...









Spies gossip that Anderson Cooper takes a shower at the gym in a pair of tight white form-fitting spandex boxer-style shorts.

Do you suppose he has a kinky fetish for silky wet fabric against the naked flesh?


Or, is he concerned that if he goes in the buff some sly gym bunny might surreptitiously nab a 360 degree image of the shower scene and stream the video onto the Internet for prying eyes to screen?

News at 11!




To strip or not to strip, that is the question

http;//www.thetattler.biz

!

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Anderson Cooper...an underwear fetish? WAAF Rocks!

Dont' be shy, Coop...show your bootie!


Spies gossip that Anderson Cooper takes a shower at the gym in a pair of tight white form-fitting spandex boxer-style shorts.

Do you suppose he has a kinky fetish for silky wet fabric against the naked flesh?

Or, is he concerned that if he goes in the buff some sly gym bunny might surreptitiously nab a 360 degree image of the shower scene and stream the video onto the Internet for prying eyes to screen?

News at 11!

To strip or not to strip, that is the question...

 
coompax-digital magazine