Las Vegas...Hotel security guards abuse guests & violate rights! Losers in monkey suits!

I felt vindicated today when I opened up the "Review Journal" and spied a report on the ongoing abusive and illegal conduct of security guards at a handful of the local Hotels - which has not only spoiled vacations for tourists - but ended up violating their civil rights in the process.

Tattler readers may recall that I have written exposes on these issues in past posts.

Harrah's Hotel

Post: 10/09/2009

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/10/harrahsvegas-casino-staff-harass-guests.html

The Golden Nugget Hotel

Post: 12/27/2007 Post: 07/10/2010

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2007/12/golden-nugget-hotelharasses-patrons-and.html

Gold Spike Hotel

Post: 07/10/2010

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/gold-spikeimpotent-security-guard-brian.html

According to the Review Journal reporter, Hotels try to keep the incidents of assault and battery on guests "Hush Hush" to avoid bad publicity and to protect their coveted image in the industry-at-large.

The main problem?

The Hotels are inclined to employ cocky security guards (unqualified losers who failed to make the grade as legitimate Police Officers officers at recognized Law Enforcement Agencies) who daily abuse their power and end up violating the rights of Hotel guests in the process.

The truth of the matter?

The rinky-dink security details (who are under the mistaken impression that they have big-swinging dicks hanging between their legs) are gangs of thugs in monkey suits with deep-rooted psychological problems.

In the Review Journal's expose, it was noted that security footage on file revealed that guests were nabbed without provocation in some instant cases and held without their will for no good reason.

Shocking DVD records in court records also determined - that on more than one occasion - a major Hotel on the Vegas Strip, handcuffed guests and took photographs of the individuals for their files (!) before releasing the shaken patrons with a warning that if they returned to the Casino they would be arrested (for what crime?).

In response, the Hotels in question were forced to face litigation, and settle out-of-court.

One online reader at the Review Journal web site actually had the audacity to allege that so-called "victims" were just opportunists seeking "marks" with deep pockets (big bucks Hotel owners).

Bullshit!

I have personally witnessed the abusive - illegal - conduct on the Casino floor at a handful of the local Hotels in the desert oasis.

I always urge victims to sue for damages to deter such heinous conduct in the future.

After all, tourists - and locals alike - are legally entitled to frequent local establishments provided they abide by the house rules and regulations and do not break any laws in the Las Vegas community-at-large!

Amen!

http://www.thetattler.biz 

 

Chief Tony Almaraz...Nevada Highway Patrol rogue officer call for resignation!

Call for resignation of Chief Tony Almaraz!

Over the 4th of July holiday, I reported a shocking shake-down on Highway I-15 in Las Vegas, instigated by a corrupt Nevada Highway Patrol officer by the name of Del Padre (Badge # 691).

Post: 07/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

In sum, Officer Del Padre engaged in an illegal stop, harassed and insulted a motorist, and seized a vehicle in Violation of the motorist's rights.

In addition, Del Padre attempted to destroy incriminating evidence - after-the-fact - to avoid recrimination later.

I noted in the post my intention to contact Chief Tony Almaraz of the Highway Patrol with the specific aim of triggering disciplinary action - and ultimately - to hasten along the release of the illegally-seized vehicle.

When I initially e-mailed Chief Tony Almaraz, he responded the day after the holdays (Tuesday July 6th) with a promise that an officer would be in touch shortly to launch an investigation.

I was hopeful that Chief Almaraz - vested with the public trust - would follow through so that the ugly incident would be resolved as quickly as possible.

The motorist in question was experiencing ill health and was left stranded with limited funds in Vegas.

Unfortunately, Chief Tony Almaraz did not follow through on his word.

In spite of the fact I stressed the urgency of the request, Chief Almaraz neglected to get back in touch "shortly" as promised.

Three days later, I was forced to zip off a follow-up e-mail, and enlighten Almaraz about that fact.

To jolt him out of his complacency, I included a link on a damaging article I wrote about  his incompetence, which ended up right next to his career profile on the Internet under a caption for the Nevada Highway Patrol.

Post: 07/08/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/chief-tony-almarazdeceitful-illegal.html
Uh-huh! 

That got a rise out of the Chief!

Within two hours, he fired off an e-mail, to assure me  that  prior to my communication that morning,  two officers had been assigned to the case.

"They informed me (Sgt. Haycox &  Sgt. Snow) that they have already contacted you," he asserted in so many words.

Lies!

A review of the e-mail stamps verify that their communications were zipped off  at approximately the same time as his panicky disjointed message to me (more on that issue later).

I wasn't born yesterday, Chief!

Sgt. Haycox's e-mail was basically a hasty note in which he outlined the steps to file a complaint against State Trooper Del Padre, and legal notice that no investigation could commence until the paperwork was lodged with the Nevada Highway Patrol, etc. etc.

I proceeded to download the complaint form, draft the complaint issues for the victim, and prepare it for submission to the Nevada Highway Patrol for investigation.

At this point, I should note that - in spite of the fact I asked for the address and/or contact number for Internal Affairs as well - neither Sgt. Haycox nor Chief Tony Almaraz provided the information.

In fact,  over the past week, I made a request for the Internal Affairs info three tmes, but as of this date (July 13th) the information has not been forthcoming. 

Is it a State secret?

Afraid of something, gentlemen?

Meanwhile, the issue of the release of the vehicle was conveniently side-stepped by Sgt. Haycox and Chief Tony Almaraz.

Surely, the complaint issues against Officer Del Padre, didn't need to be resolved before the SUV could  be released to its registered owner?

Subsequently, I zipped off an e-mail to Sgt Haycox and Chief Tony Almaraz, with a demand that they prepare the proper documenation so that the victim could pick up his vehicle.

At this point, Sgt. Haycox set forth a couple of options in a follow-up e-mail, which he asserted would resolve the issue.

As it turns out, Sgt. Haycox was simply engaging in a lot of smoke-and-mirrors maneuvers.

Was this a mean-spirited attempt to punish the motorist for filing a complaint against a fellow officer?

When the evenets of the past week are reviewed, the answer rings out loud and clear.

Yes!

For example, in his instructions, Sgt Haycox assured the motorist they could drop into the Nevada Highway Patrol's "South Command" office and arrange for a release of the "hold"  with the appropriate doucments.

If the victim was not in possession of that paperwork, Sgt. Haycox noted that - in the alternative - the motorist could go to the DMV and obtain a "Drive Away" permit so the vehicle could be driven on to the victim's home state without further incident.

Because the Nevada Highway Partrol was out-of-the-way, and the motorist was without his vehicle, he elected to go to the DMV (which required one simple trip on a bus without any complications).

At the DMV, the motorist was able to secure the "Drive Away" permit.

On that occasion, there was a Divine Intervention, which I shall discuss later in a follow-up post.

Meanwhile, the motorist returned to their Hotel - hopeful that the following morning - they would be able to secure their vehicle.

Today - the motorist e-mailed an update on the status of the "Drive Away" permit to Officer Haycox, so he would be aware that all the  documents were in order.

In that e-mail, he also noted that he was proceeding down to the tow yard to pick up his vehicle.

Although Officer Haycox had hours to do so, he never responded to that e-mail, so the motorist proceeded to the tow yard confident that all his paperwork was in order.

After sweating in a hundred-degree weather in the mid-day sun for a couple of hours or so, the motorist - who was suffering shortness of breath and not feeling too well - finally arrived at the Highway Patrol's impound unit at South Strip Towing (3255 Pollux Ave / Las Vegas NV 891020).


When the exhausted individual produced the "Drive Away" permit, a snotty little clerk in the employ of South Strip Towing, snarled at the motorist that his permit was not sufficient.

"You need a pass from the Nevada Highway Patrol," she barked at him.

The tourist tried to explain that the "Drive Away" permit was already sanctioned by Officer Haycox.

At this point, another disgruntled motorist, spoke up.

"I got the same run-around from these people and the Nevada Highway Patrol. It sucks. I had to come down here twice, take a day off work. And it has cost me. I am furious."

Then, the irate young lady lamented that in spite of the fact it was public knowledge that this tow truck facility engaged in shocking mean-spirited conduct on a regular basis, the Nevada Highway Patrol has not taken any action to correct the situation or consider turning over the account to kind decent operators who have a little more compassion and understanding and professionalism.

In spite of the obvious misunderstanding, the clerk refused to permit the motorist to borrow their phone,   so he could speak to a Nevada Highway Patrol officer regarding Sgt. Haycox's directive.

"I don't have a vehicle. I am ill. I am just about ready to collapse in this heat. Can't you help me, please," he begged.

No way, Jose!

At this point, the nasty employee basically laughed at the both of them from the comfort of her glassed-in crawl space.

Then, after claiming there was no manager on the premises to speak to, the cold fish went and hid in the back of the small trailer and continued to make fun of the desperate motorists grumbling about the outrage of it all.

One motorist was kind enough to lend the tourist her cell phone so he could call the Nevada Highway Patrol himself.

Once he got a dispatch person on the line, though, the ditzy Nevada Highway Patrol employee showed little remorse about the obvious misunderstanding and escalating crisis.

At the request of the frustrated victim, she did contact Sgt. Haycox, but he refused to speak to  the stressed-out tourist on the telephone.

"You have to come down to South Command for a release, Sir," was the message he uttered up to dispatch to pass along.

Sgt. Haycox demonstrated by his actions that he could care less that the motorist was about to collapse, was suffering from heat exhaustion, and was in desperate need of assistance.

To add to the lunacy (and cruelty) of it all, it should be noted that when the motorist asked for instructions on how to get to South Command to obtain the release document, she proceeded to give  instructions for the highway route.

What a sorry excuse for a human being!

"Miss, I don't have a vehicle. Please don't give me freeway instructions," he pleaded.

Was she really THAT stupid?

Or, was it a deliberate slap in the face to humiliate the victim further?

"Are you going take a cab, then," she continued in the blink-of-an-eye.

"No, I don't have any money for a taxi," he replied in desperation.

Do these dummies think that money grows on trees?

Because of the illegal seizure of the vehicle on July 4th, the motorist was forced to extend Hotel accommodation a few days, and ended up - as a result - depleting funds.

Did she show any compassion at this juncture?

No.

When the motorist expressed his dismay that the Nevada Highway Patrol was supposed to protect and serve - and that inferred that she was failing to meet that mandate - she remained silent!

Did she apologize to the victim at any point?

Hell, no!

It shocks the sensibilities to imagine that a Highway Patrol Officer would act in such a cold heartless fashion and ignore a citizen's emergency needs!

Chief Tony Almaraz proved to be a slippery piece of work, too.

In recent days, for example, he established to me - by virtue of his sloppy unprofessional conduct - that he is uneducated, an ineffective community leader, incompetent, and not qualified to head up the Nevada Highway Patrol.

For starters, he has difficulty expressing himself in plain English!

For instance, it is obvious from the following excerpt from one of his e-mails, that Chief Almaraz lacks the ability to construct a simple grammatically-sound sentence in the language of the land.

Example
(July 8th e-mail excerpt written by Chief Tony Almaraz)

"I was informed by my command staff in Las Vegas that you have been in fact, contacted reference your complaint against Trp. DelPadre"

Huh?
His failure to correct the glaring English glitch hints at an additional lack of skills.

Doesn't the Chief  know how to conduct a grammar check or use the spell check tool?

Then, there is the question of actual performance, and the ablity to take appropriate action to expedite solutions to problems when called for, and so forth and so on.

For instance, it took three days for Chief Tony Almaraz and his bum-boy Sgt. Haycox, to inform the motorist in question that a trip to the DMV - and application for a "Drive Away" permit - would expedite the release of the vehicle.

Because of the Chief's negligence (and incompetence) in that regard, the vehicle sat in storage un-necessarily for three days racking up storage fees!

In view of the aforementioned facts, it is evident that Chief Tony Almaraz has a problem responding to emergency situations, assigning intelligent personnel to resolve important citizen complaints when they arise, or even exercise any leadership ability when the situation cries out for it.

Essentially, Chief Tony Almaraz is unqualified for the role of head honcho at the Nevada Highway Patrol.

As I noted earlier, Chief Tony Almaraz only bothered to step into the fray, when it came to his attention that I  am a journalist with thousands of readers on the internet and in a position to expose his incompetence, negligence,  and corruption to the public at large and various media outlets who follow my "feeds".

That's a shocking commentary on the Nevada Highway Patrol and Chief Almaraz, if you ask me.

For the foregoing reasons, I urge the resignation of Chief Tony Almaraz, with the ultimate aim of purging the Law Enforcement Agency of a corrupt element that flies in the face of Justice and morality.

Amen!

http://www.julianayrs.com/

Gold Spike...impotent Security Guard Brian Wills harasses Guests! Weasel lies to protect self!

Spike got a "face-lift" but ironically toilets still clog with shit!

(curb appeal on the cheap! cheap! cheap!)

Today, an impotent security guard - in a rinky-dink money suit - stepped into a heap-load of sh** when he harassed and discriminated against a guest in the Gold Spike Hotel in Las Vegas.

You know the type - a pig-headed loser who couldn't make the Police force dons a uniform with a gun packed in the holster to bolster his manhood - then proceeds to strut around like he has a big-swinging dick and the right to abuse the power vested in him by dim-witted Management at the Hotel who don't have a clue about the potenital liability of having a yahoo on the payroll.

A case in point.

Shortly after a guest exited the lobby for a jaunt over to the pool for a late-afternoon dip, a security guard by the name of - Brian Wills - stepped out of some bushes (!!!) and - in a threatening mean-spirited way - barked at the paying guest that he "couldn't go back there" (to the pool area).

Why, pray tell?

The lughead, with all the personality of a worm, didn't cite any reason - which infers from the get-go - that the Officer was openly discriminating on a whim.

Assholes, tend to do that, 'ya know?

Just maybe, he was jealous of the guest's cool shades?

Because the guest's lodging fees included use of the pool, Brian Wills' attempt to turn-back the individual, amounted to a denial of their right to access and privileges promised by the owners and management of the hotel when the room was booked (and paid for in full).

When the guest (aware that the Security Guard suffered from a low IQ) noticed that Wills was prone to over-step his bounds - and act out-of-line - he proceeded to politely inform the security guard that he was a registered guest at the Hotel.

The guard, realizing his fatal mistake, did a double-take in shock.

Ooops!

But, instead of taking the guest at his word (hadn't he eaten enough crow already?), he rudely demanded that the well-known celebrity guest show his key.

But, get this, the shocking misconduct persisted.

Instead of accepting the key as proof positive, he angrily asked for the suite number, after-the-fact.

Once again, the guest was able to provide the information at lightning speed - which would have satisfied any secruity guard - with an ounce of intelligence.

But the stupidity continued, when the slack-jawed bozo demanded the guest's name, too!

All efforts to block the guest's right to enter were snuffed out in one fell swoop by the intelligent, quick-thinking of the insightful guest - who had his number, just betcha - since the first moment the trigger-happy psycho's sorry carcass strolled onto the terrain.

But, the drama was far from over, as the wounded security guard emotionally-charged-up with anger and retaliatory thoughts swimming inside his ugly head, plottted to win at all cost to save face.

For instance, shortly after the guest arrived at the bar at the rear of the pool area, the security guard - who now appeared to be stalking him - appeared from behind and shouted in a loud voice so the poolside revellers  in the immediate vicinity could hear:

"You've got shit on the back of  your pants. You have to go clean up."

Talk about rude and insulting.

If you ask me, the security guard's defamatory remarks, are sufficient grounds for compensatory and punitive damages in a local Civil Court.

That's what happens when a Hotel hires a piece of white trash without one well-mannered, educated, or classy bone, in their entire fat frame.

Notwithstanding, some of bizarre conduct, begs an obvious question.

Why was Brian Wills checking out the guest's ass?

Secondly, the allegation was ridiculous.

The fashion-savvy guest was wearing acid-dyed jeans - a fabric design idea - that often creates "patches" of discoloration on the surface (and even the interior) of the garment.

What an idiot!

I expect he wears fruit-of-the-lumes with urine stains on the crotch!

The wild accusation was just an outrageous shoddy ploy to embarrass and humiliate the guest in front of a patio packed with revellers who were now gazing on in shock and disbelief.

At this point, Wills had the audacity to shout at the guest:

"Go get yourself cleaned up or change your pants."

In view of the fact other guests were in - shorts, flimsy-bikini-briefs, and an odd-assortment of fashions current and out-of-favor- the notion that the guest should change his pants for a security guard who didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground was an absurd notion.

Because the allegations were confusing - and bizarre - the guest went up to their room to take a backward's glance at the "ass" of the slacks in the mirror to fathom what the fuss was all about.

Nothing out of the unusual.

As aforementioned, some blotched areas - on the jeans when they were originally purchased - were subtly noticeable as usual.

At this juncture, the guest tried an experiment.

He splashed water on the area the guard complained about - but, no sir - the patters ingrained in the jeans were not about to "wash out" so easily.

The guest proceeded to Video-tape the jeans so there would be evidence to support his claims in the event a lawsuit is filed for damages.

So there, Wills!

Obviously, the demented guard - with poor sight, perhaps? - jumped-the-gun and came to the wrong conclusion.

Or, was he just desperately trying to find an excuse, in a deceitful effort to try to substantiate his outrageous conduct - and ultimately - "weasle" out of his gross error in judgment?

When the guest stopped down at the front desk to file a complaint with the Supervisor, the rogue Security Guard trotted up - got in the victim's face - and tried to bully him further.

In no uncertain terms, the guest reiterated in front of witnesses standing in the lobby, that Officer Brian Wills decided at first glance that the guest "did not belong" there and - contrary to the guard's false statements - tried to deny him access "because he had the authority" (but no legitimate cause) to do so.

The officer engaged in the discriminatory conduct before he even "checked-out" the guest's ass.

A pretty, firm one, if 'ya ask moi!

Maybe the guest should file a formal complaint for sexual harrassment and stalking against that security guard?

After all, judging by what I witnessed, that Brian Wills is a perverted demented piece of work.

At this point, the supervisor instructed Mr. Wills to back off, so he could have a meaningful discussion about the disturbing incident without interruption, in order to properly address the sick behaviour of the security guard who obviously needs therapy.

Frankly, in my estimation, Brian Wills poses a threat to the guests and the casino-going throngs as well who frequent the Spike.

"Rotundo" (the guard in charge that evening) apologized - extended his hand - and tried to calm the waters.

However, it was pretty obvious that he was anxious for the incident to go no farther.

Golly, wonder why?

Unfortunately for the guard, the guest requested a complaint form so that a full investigation could be pursued with vigor.

Officer Brian Wills, after all, demonstrated today that he lacks sound judgment, abuses his power, openly provokes and harasses hotel guests without povocation at whim, and - in the final analysis - has a sick  meanstreak that not only makes him unfit for the job but in emergency need of psychological counselling.

He's a loose cannon about to go off!

Personally, I was flabberghasted by what went down, especially in view of the fact the individual in question was a well-known celebrity around the globe!

Does Brian Wills have his head so far up his sloppy butt-hole, that he doesn't know what's going on in celebrity-filled Vegas on a daily basis all around him?

Las Vegas residents and businesses have been moaning and groaning about a lack of business in recent days.

No wonder, Brian Wills and his merry gang of thugs are scaring them all away.

A pleasant-young desk clerk (by the name of "Tara") - who expressed dismay and sorrow over the unfortunate incident - assured the guest that if he dropped by the office the following morning that the Hotel Manager would not only lend a sympathetic ear - but also - take swift appropriate action against Brian Wills for his misconduct, wrongful discriminatory acts, and open harassment of the guest in Violation of his rights.

Ironically, just this morning, I posted a glowing review of the Spike Hotel, encouraging guests to book into this boutique-style gem.

Post: 07/10/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/gold-spikevegas-update-affordable.html

Now, I have to take pause to consider one glaring truth.

Until Officer Brian Wills is removed from Security Guard detail at the Spike Hotel, perhaps guests intending to book a room in the near future, should move on to lodging where security guards have taken an oath to protect and keep safe guests and not discriminate, harass, and violate their rights as Officer Brian Wills is inclined to do.

News at 11!

www.ijulian.blogspot.com

 

Brian Wills attended rinky-dink Security Guard School!

http://www.julianayrs.com/

Chief Tony Almaraz...deceitful illegal conduct @ Nevada Highwway Patrol! Stalling & delaying tactics frustrate Citizen rights!

A few days ago, I reported on the misconduct of Officer Del Padre, a trooper in the employ of the Nevada Highway Patrol.

The rogue Officer - Del Padre (Badge # 691) - stopped a motorist without the appropriate authority (legal grounds) to do so , harassed the disabled individual on the side of Highway I-15 (Las Vegas), attempted to destroy evidence that would incriminate himself, then proceeded to illegally seize the motorist's vehicle.

Post: 07/05/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

Post: 07/06/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-immigration-lawnevada-highway.html

I immediately lodged a formal complaint with Highway Patrol Chief -Tony Almaraz - by e-mail communicaton that afternoon.

Because of the long week-end, I did not receive any word back right away, presumably because Almaraz's office was closed for the 3 days in question.

However, I was encouraged that there may be a quick resolution to the problems outlined in my complaint, when Mr. Almaraz's office responded to my e-mail complaint Tuesday morning after the holiday with a promise to investigate and get back to me.

Three days later, there was no word "back" from Mr. Almaraz, so I was forced to zip off a second e-mail to ask for an update on the investigation since the motorist I filed the complaint on behalf of was starting to suffer damages from Officer Del Padre's wrongful illegal conduct on the side of the highway a few days earlier.

For example, the disabled motorist was stranded with no transportation and little cash in Las Vegas.

In addition, the stress and strain of the ordeal, was starting to cause undue physical, emotonal, and financial hardship to the motorist.

The situation became urgent, subsequently.

In spite of informing Chief Almarez of these disturbing turn-of-events - so that he could grasp the seriousness of the situation which was escalating by the hour - the Nevada Highway Patrol officer entrusted to look out for Public Safety in his capacity as head of the agency has failed to respond.

In addition, it should be noted, that my request for the name and contact e-mail (or physical address) of Internal Affairs has also been ignored.

Was Chief Almaraz's intitial response just a public relations ploy?

Surely, if the man had an ounce of decency (or compassion), he'd take prompt swift action to rectify the wrongs committed due to the illegal conduct of his Officer (Del Padre / Badge No. 691)?

Or, is his stalling and delaying - a clear-cut signal - that he is bent on engaging in a conspiracy to protect his officer - and ultimately - the name and reputation of his Law Enforcement Agency?

After all, my request was simple and straightforward, and does not require a lot of intelligence to carry out.

For example, in my complaint, I demanded that the Nevada Highway Patrol:

1. Waive the towing & storage fees since the seizure was illegal.
2. Release the vehicle to the motorist.
2. Issue an apology.

How difficult a task is that to fulfill?

It should be noted that at the Nevada Highway Patrol web site, the agency has posted a glowing tribute for Chief Tony Almaraz, with a flattering run-down on his alleged past achievements.

It should be noted that the profile states that in November of 2008, Almaraz was assigned to the Department of Public Safety / Nevada Highway Patrol Headquarters, where he was responsible for personnel, budgets and managed issues with the Legislative Counsel Bureau.

That credit alone tends to infer that he should be capable of resolving this complaint issue in a snap.

On the heels of that assignment, he was installed as Chief of the Nevada Highway Patrol.

Evidently,  Almaraz has the power & authority to resolve the complaint.

So, why has Chief Almaraz been dragging his feet, and neglecting his duty to rectify the wrongs inflicted on an innocent citizen, by a corrupt cop who is an obvious threat to the community-at-large?

Maybe the Department of Justice or the FBI can toss some light on that question!

http://www.julianayrs.com/

Profile of Judge Judith Chirlin Los Angeles Superior Court...abuse of power, unlawful interference with appeal process, court corruption!

Boxing Judge Judith C. Chirlin!

Industry-insiders may recall that Kim Basinger agreed to appear in the feature - "Boxing Helena" - by virtue of a "memo", and later, subsequently found herself hauled into court by the producers for damages when she bowed out of the project.

Unfortunately for the Hollywood beauty, her case was referred to a disreputable female jurist, Judge Judith C. Chirlin.

From the get-go, rumors abounded once Chirlin's courtroom shenanigans commenced.

Some whispered that the gruff Judge was a lesbo with the hots for Basinger.

To others, the horsey woman with the overblown sense of self-importance, was - quite simply - jealous of the starlet, her stunning looks, and the rich trappings that were part 'n parcel of her fame.

But the showdown really came to fore when Judge Chirlin manipulated the proceedings in a deceitful effort to grab the brass ring for herself.



In fact, after ruling in favor of the producers on the breach of contract suit, Chirlin had the audacity to attend the premiere of "Boxing Helena" which - to some - appeared to rub salt in the wound.

The Commission on Judicial Performance was inclined to issue a much harsher rebuke.

After reviewing the facts, the Commission publicly admonished Judge Chirlin for improper conduct within the meaning of Article VI, Section 18 (d) of the California Constitution based on the following facts:

"In 1993, a jury trial in the case of Main Line Pictures, Inc. v. Kim Basinger et al, was conducted before Judge Chirlin.

The case involved an action for breach of contract based on defendant Basinger's alleged withdrawal from Main Line's movie "Boxing Helena" which was completed and released with a different female lead.

The case attracted significant media attention due to the subject matter and the celebrity of the defendant.

There was a verdict for plaintiff Main Line Pictures, Inc. on March 23, 1993.

A notice of appeal was filed by defendants Kim Basinger, et al. on July 16, 1993.

In August 1993, Judge Chirlin attended the world premiere of "Boxing Helena" at the invitation of the movie's producer, the plaintiff in Main Line Pictures, Inc. v. Kim Basinger, et al.

The premiere consisted of the showing of the movie followed by a reception at a local Los Angeles restaurant.

Judge Chirlin's attendance at the event was noted in the media.

Judge Chirlin's attendance at the premiere was improper in that it contributed to an appearance of bias.

Due to Judge Chirlin's role in the trial of the lawsuit, the judge was seen as joining in the plaintiff's celebration of the movie's release and the plaintiff's celebration of its legal victory.

An appearance of bias or partiality erodes public confidence in and respect for the judiciary.

Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities; Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires that judges perform judicial duties without bias; Canon 4 requires that a judge's conduct (even extrajudicial activities) do not cast reasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge.

On January 2, 1994, while the appeal of judgment in Main Line Pictures Inc. v. Kim Basinger, et al. was still pending, an article appeared in the Los Angeles Times Sunday magazine about the case.

Judge Chirlin was interviewed for the article and asked about allegations that her rulings during the trial exhibited bias against defendant Basinger.

Judge Chirlin was quoted as saying:

"The fact of the matter is that throughout the trial, a significant portion of my rulings were in favor of Kim."

The commission found that Judge Chirlin's comments to the reporter about the Main Line Pictures. Inc. v. Kim Basinger, et al. case were in conflict with the provisions of Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, which states in part:

"A judge should not make any public comment about a pending or impending proceeding in any court."

At the time of the remarks, an appeal of the judgment was pending.

The requirement that judges refrain from commenting about cases continues during any appellate process until final disposition."

In arriving at their finding, the commission noted that the judge recognized and acknowledged the impropriety of her attendance at the premiere and of her public comments regarding the case.

But, Chirlin proceeded to thumb her nose at the Commission - and in a handful of cases that followed - abused her power, manipulated court documents, and on one occasion made inappropriate direct communication with Justice Klein in the 2nd Appellate Court (Division 3) which adversely (and unlawfully) affected the Appellant's right to a fair hearing on the appeal.

For example, in a case involving a dispute over damages in a civil suit, the defendant's attorney submitted a "Motion" to the court asking that the plaintiff be declared a "vexatious litigant".

In support of the arguments set forth in the moving papers, the dishonest attorney not only misrepresented the facts - but also misinterpreted the Civil Code - in an underhanded attempt to prevail at the hearing.

Notwithstanding the fact the Plaintiff was not served with any notice of the hearing (and subsequently did not appear in court), Judge Chirlin proceeded to grant the motion in spite of the fact the Plaintiff did not meet the stringent requirements of applicable California Code.

Was Chirlin ignorant about the specifics of the Statute and binding case law?

Obviously!

The fact that she didn't bother to research the issue not only established her incompetence, but her willingness to put the integrity of the court at risk.

Or, was there something more sinister underfoot?

Did Chirlin have associations with the defendants (a thriving business entity) that prompted her to "swing" the ruling in their favor?

In view of what transpired thereafter, it doesn't appear to be a far-fetched notion.

For example, after the ruling of the court was served on the plaintiff, he proceeded to lodge an appeal with the 2nd Appellate Court, which was promptly assigned to Division 3.

Pursuant to Rules of Court, the Appellant served a "Notice of Appeal" on Chirlin.

Shortly thereafter, Judge Chirlin contacted Justice Klein in the Appellate Court, and whispered in the Jurist's ear that the Appellant was a vexatious litigant.

It is important to note that Chirlin neglected to inform Justice Klein that the issue on appeal pertained to the Appellant's alleged "vexatious litigant" status declared by the lower court.

Subsequently, Klein assumed that because the Appellant was "allegedly" a known vexatious litigant in the environs of the court, that the appeal must be frivolous.

Henceforth, Klein dismissed the appeal without a proper review, and in direct violation of the Appellant's right to an appeal on the issue.

If a plaintiff is declared a vexatious litigant - and the allegations do not meet the stringent requirements of the Statute - he or she has every right pursuant to California law to lodge an appeal on the issue to determine if there was error in the lower court proceedings.

In sum, Judge Judith C. Chirlin willfully and wrongfully interfered with the Appellate process, misrepresented the facts to a Justice of the Appellate Court - and ultimately - abused her power.

All to the damage of the Plaintiff/Appellant.

In another incident at the courthouse, a man delivering paperwork to her courtroom at the downtown Los Angeles Superior Court facility, was detained, searched, and held against his will - without explanation - due to Judge Chirlin's skewered view of her Judicial reach.

The unsuspecting fellow innocently entered Chirlin's courtroom one fine morning with the specific aim of hand-delivering moving papers (and the documents in support) to the Jurist's clerk to meet a filing deadline.

Inside, Judge Chirlin was engaged in a discussion with an attorney.

So - as quickly and quietly as possible - the gentleman turned over the paperwork to the court clerk, turned on his heel, and exited.

About five minutes later, when he stepped off an escalator, two Sheriffs strode up and demanded that he halt.

In response to instructions on a walkie-talkie, the guards proceeded to frisk the startled citizen, search through his pockets at whim, and snatch up his wallet.

No explanation was forthcoming when the man expressed his outrage at what appeared to be an illegal search and seizure in direct violation of his rights.

Just as quickly as the ugly scene unfolded, it ended, when the guards permitted him to go on his way.

The shaken man later determined that Judge Chirlin ordered the demeaning detainment because she was put-off by the fact noise filtered into the courtroom during the proceeding when he innocently entered and exited.

In retrospect, it's obvious that Judge Chirlin not only has a vindictive streak - but without warning - is capable of striking out and abusing her power.

In spite of the fact Chirlin was in the middle of a hearing, and the man was hardly out the door, within minutes she articulated her rage by issuing an directive that the intruder be hunted down, detained, and humiliated with a body search.

And, to heck with her court proceeding, eh?

Chirlin has also been known to bully and belittle lawyers who appear before her, too.

Undoubtedly, the lady (and I use the term loosely) suffers from an inferiority complex.

A search on the Internet will also rustle up a handful of curious posts about Judge Chirlin, worthy of taking a gander at.

Glowing tributes appear to have been posted by friends and business associates (or, just maybe, by Chirlin herself) in a sly effort to rehabilitate her image.

I laughed out loud when I came across one news clip which reported that Chirlin narrowly missed a bomb blast when she was in war-torn Baghdad.

I just betcha she was the intended target!

After all, over the years Judge Chirlin has racked up quite a few enemies in the Judicial system, back-stabbing legal circles, and among the social-climbing set beyond those realms.

In the final analysis, Judge Judith C. Chirlin is a disgrace to the Judiciary, an inept Judge wallowing in a sesspool of corruption down at the courthouse.

Until the dragon lady is ousted from the bench, the integrity of the court will constantly be at risk.

Karl Kraus once opined:

"Corruption is worse than prostitution. The latter might endanger the morals of an individual, the former invariably endangers the morals of the entire country."

http://www.julianayrs.com

Sarah Palin...Attorney argument about Ethics Law bullsh**. Todd Palin pursued personal vendetta at State expense...

I'm in like Flynn with the Governor...

In a post yesterday - after a ruling was issued from the State Legislative Council confirming that Governor Sarah Palin was "guilty" of an "Abuse of Power" - I warned that the deceitful Vice Presidential hopeful would be tossing a spin on the outcome to cast doubts on the probe into her reprehensible conduct.

True to form - Palin's attorneys released a statement over the weekend - wildly asserting that because the "State Ethics Statute" allegedly only refers to "financial" abuses, that Sarah Palin is not guilty of any abuse of power.

On the false premise that Sarah Palin was "not found" to have misused funds - or broken the public trust in that regard - her legal bozos are trying to effect damage control by arguing that the Legislative Council misinterpreted the Ethics Statute - and hence - their thorough findings have no merit.

On the contrary.

In their investigation, the investigators determined that Todd Palin used the Governor's office to carry out Sarah's personal vendetta against the disgruntled State Trooper.

For example, the 1st Dude (!) directed at least one secretary in the Governor's office to contact potential witnesses on the telephone, so that interviews could be set up in Sarah's office to carry out a probe he was heading up (!!!).

Then, on the heels of those overtures, Todd met with a handful of individuals in the Governor's office - at the State's expense - and commenced to interrogate the witnesses about the State Trooper's conduct, personnel record, and other matters his wife found offensive.

For starters - it should be noted from the get-go - that the Legislative authority determined that Todd's handling of those specific personal matters - in the environs of the Governor's office - was unethical and established an abuse of power.

In fact,witnesses noted (after-the-fact) that they not only felt Todd was seeking to "boost" his stature by using Sarah's office for the queries - but used the setting in a deceitful effort to force cooperation.

Understandably, the witnesses felt intimidated by Todd's continued use of the Governor's office during the Trooper probe, in view of the circumstances.

Notwithstanding the obvious, Palin's attorneys clearly have sh** for brains.

Before they opened their yaps, they should have considered the facts.

For instance, it has been established that Todd used Sarah's staff to make telephone calls and set up appointments.

Because the Governor's staff are paid a salary from the public coffers - in essence -Todd misused an "asset" of the State for Palin's own personal gain.

Further, I conjecture that Mr. Palin did not hold his meetings in the dark.

Doesn't the Governor's office get billed for the use of utilities?

I would hazard a guess that Todd also used stationary, pens, fax machines, and what-have-you.

Did he order up coffee and a snack for the "witnesses"?

According to reliable sources, Todd was in the Governor's office hours on end, conducting his man-hunt.

No doubt, he ate on occasion.

If he ordered take-out, who footed the bill?

Did he pay out of his own pocket - or simply sign a tab with a flourish of his cocky pen - so that the personal items would be summarily billed to the Governor's office?

Since there are phone records - and other logs available that track such matters - I expect that a fuller investigation would determine the width-and-breadth of Todd Palin's misuse of the "assets" of the Governor's office.

When it gets right down to it, the Palin's have no class.

It should be obvious to voters Sarah and Todd are white trailer trash.

Is that the element Americans want running the White House?


And, abusing connections to oust 'em when necessary...

Sarah Palin...guilty of "Abuse of Power". Yup, I feel vindicated...

Lethal dose of Kryptonite (truth) topples Palin...


Yesterday, Fox lodged an in-depth report on the Palin "incident" on their website - and consequently - a post I penned on the Sarah Palin probe based on allegations of "abuse of power" was linked to the Fox Network site.

As a result, there was a big surge in traffic to my blog at wordpress yesterday, as intrigued voters sought out clues on the Sarah Palin fiasco.

One whacko Palin supporter zipped off a message to me - obviously triggered by the fact he was angry with my searing criticism of the VP hopeful - and asserted in that communication that because Palin's camp rushed forward this past week (when all else failed to block the investigation) to conduct their own analysis of the events - that somehow - this established Palin was eager to resolve the issues.

"Don't you feel foolish now?" he snidely remarked in his skitzo communication.

Boy, does that guy need his head examined!

Especially in view of the facts that have unfolded.

On the contrary sir, I feel vindicated.

Since day one, I have been following the Palin story.

Weeks ago, I reported that Palin initially agreed to cooperate with the Legislature's investigation into the matter, until John McCain plucked her out of obscurity to be his running mate.

At that juncture - the stakes got higher - so Palin was obviously forced to re-think her tenuous position.

Then, Palin maneuvered her first flip-flop.

On the grounds that the investigation was turning into a political witch-hunt - manipulated by a handful of democrats with their own agenda - Palin began to vigorously resist the investigation.

When her aides - and husband Todd, too - were served with subpoenas to testify, for instance, they thumbed their noses at the proceedings and defiantly refused to obey the legally-binding court orders.

Desperate - her legal eagles scurried to file a lawsuit in Superior Court in the State of Alaska - in a bold-faced effort to block the proceedings.



Unfortunately (and no doubt due to the glaring facts in evidence) things went seriously awry for Sarah, thereafter.

For starters, the court dismissed the legal action filed by the stalwart Republicans, on the grounds that the Legislature was vested with full jurisdiction to carry out their probe on Palin.

On the heels of this ruling, investigators vowed to surge on with their fact-finding mission, interviews with key witnesses, and what have you.

Yes - it was made crystal clear to the Palin camp - that the investigation would go forward in spite of Palin's deceitful efforts to conceal facts and evidence - with the specific aim of saving her political reputation.

Today, it comes as no surprise, to hear that Palin has been found guilty on all the charges of "Abuse of Power."

First, it should be noted for the record, that investigators acknowledged that Ms. Palin had the authority (as Governor) to fire a State employee.

But, that was never the issue.

However, Palin supporters will put their own spin on that in the next few days, in an underhanded effort to effect damage control.

Ignore it, 'cause it amounts to a lot of smoke and mirrors.

No, it was the manner in which the "firing" was handled, the specious grounds on which the dismissal was undertaken, and the attempted cover-up afterwards that is the real crux of it all.

Right off-the-bat, it's obvious that Palin was guilty of distorting and misrepresenting the facts, in a dishonest ploy to validate her inappropriate unprofessional (illegal) conduct.

For example, from the get-go, Palin plied the bald-faced excuse that the Trooper was ripe for firing because he shot a female Moose without a license.

The investigators determined, however, that Palin did not disclose all the facts regarding the incident.

Palin neglected to point out that the Trooper was in the presence of his wife (who held a license)when the Moose was shot.

One of the investigators noted for the record - that if the Trooper was guilty of some illegal act on that occasion - his wife would be, too.

But, the woman in question was Palin's sister, so the Gov conveniently witheld the information.

That is just the tip of the iceberg, as they say in Alaska, when it comes to the kind of hypocrisy Palin is inclined to daily engage in at whim.

The former beauty Queen often utilized snatches of information to sway public opinion, but often held back on pertinent facts that would clearly establish the opposition's allegations of wrongdoing to be true.

For example, Palin was on-the-rag a lot over the Trooper's alleged misconduct, and gave the impression his wild unpredictable behaviour warranted a "firing".

On this premise, Palin took a leap, and asserted no wrongdoing for her attempted intervention.

However - the nervy little broad neglected to note for the record - that the Trooper had already been investigated - and summarily - disciplined.

In a nutshell, the issues she raised were neither here nor there in the grand scheme of things.

Notwithstanding the foregoing mind-boggling deceits - it was also determined by virtue of the full-scale investigation into the events - that Palin deliberately partook in actions officials warned were illegal.


For instance, Palin installed her husband (Todd Palin) to handle communications over the State Trooper matter, in spite of the fact a State Official made no bones about the fact Todd's dubious involvement was unethical.


That is why the investigators in the recent probe issued a finding - that the contacts were not only a breach of ethics - but tantamount to an "abuse of power".

Specifically, the report noted the following.

"Sarah Palin knowingly - as the term is defined in the (ethics) statutes - permitted Todd Palin to use the Governor's office and the resources of the Governor's office, including access to State employees, to continue to contact subordinate State employees in an effort to find some way to get Trooper Wooten fired."

It is a matter of record that Todd Palin asked to review Wooten's personnel file, too!

Without doubt, Palin also crossed the line because the State Ethics Act holds that public officials have a duty of public trust that prevents them from attempting to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action.

Pursuant to State Law, twelve members of the Legislature's fourteen member Legislative Council, elected to deliberate on their findings in a closed-door session this past week.

After the better part of the day had elapsed, the Council voted unanimously to release the whopping 263 (!) page document to the public.

Curiously, the council is made up of 10 Republicans and 4 Democrats.

That kind of blows to smitherines the allegation by Palin that Democrats were strong-arming the proceedings against her, doesn't it?

Civil penalties for the offenses range from impeachment by the Legislature to a reprimand or fine in the sum of $5,000.00 by the State Personnel Board.

I can hear the protesters in the street crying out now.

Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!

If Palin has any conscience - or sense of decency - she'll bow out of the Presidential Race and give McCain the opportunity to dredge up an appropriate alternative candidate that won't try to hoodwink the American Voter - like Palin has tried to - since day one of her celebrated entrance onto the world stage.

Sarah Palin...Gang of 7 twist in wind and agree to testify!

Never throw pearls before swine...


Looks like the rug is being pulled out from under Sarah Palin.

Last week - a Superior Court Judge ruled that the legislative body assigned to investigate allegations against her for "abuse of power" - has proper jurisdiction to review the issues.

Subsequently, a lawsuit filed to block the investigation was summarily dismissed.

Up until that swift sure ruling, Palin's "soldiers" - seven scurrilous aides who have stood by their Ice Queen in the scandal that has been brewing in recent weeks - were inclined to thumb their noses at the investigation and ignore subpoenas.

That was troubling for a couple of reasons.

For starters, the "subpoena" practice was instituted by lawmakers to ensure that hostile witnesses appeared before a proper legal authority when summoned.

In addition, laws were also put in place, to penalize those who disobeyed a summons under the premise that the overt act was in "contempt of court".

If Palin and her gang of rogue aides are inclined to disobey the laws of the land in the throes of the election process, just imagine the kind of despicable illegal conduct they'll be furthering once they are firmly ensconced in the hallowed halls of the White House.

Without doubt - the Palinites will follow Rove's cue - and cite executive privilege to avoid close scrutiny of their wrongful acts.

While new developments in the saga have left some scratching their heads, I'm not fooled, to say the least.

Yes, it has been reported that the Palin scoundrels will now testify, in respect to the issues at hand.

Break out the Moosebear, dudes!

Are they taking a cue from O.J. Simpson's friends and business associates (who turned on him during the recent robbery and kidnapping trial) in order to save their own precious hides?

The answer may be twofold.

Since the court dismissed the legal action in respect to jurisdiction, the Palin miscreant's are painfully aware now that failure to appear to testify, may result in criminal action for contempt of court.

Notwithstanding - because the head investigator has noted for the record the investigation is almost complete - they undoubtedly have come to recognize the folly of their ways.

If the Palin camp doesn't offer up some defense in the proceedings, Republicans may lose their bid for a verdict of not guilty for Sarah.

Palin, on the other hand, remains misguided and - basically - in a sad funk.

According to the latest press reports, Sarah is stridently arguing to anyone within earshot, that the State's personnel board should investigate the firing which has her up on charges for alleged abuse of power.

Since Palin has the authority to "fire" a member of the personnel board, isn't it obvious to the dizzy broad, that there is a conflict of interest?

Moreover, does she honestly think the personnel board would feel comfortable ruling on such an issue, when she is currently accused of firing an employee that refused to obey her wishes before?

It's obvious to any fool, they'd be next on her hit list!

Palin stepped into a heap of Moose dung day one when she refused to cooperate with the investigation.

Before the whole scandal has gone bye-bye, Ms. Goody two-shoes will be eating crow, no doubt.

Sophisticated city slickers are light years ahead of you, Sarah.

Time you got up to speed and fessed up.

Sarah Palin...power-plays in court! The VP hopeful fights for political life...

A handful of Sarin Palin's bulldogs filed a lawsuit this past week to block an investigation triggered by accusations of "abuse of power" - or remove "alleged enemies" of the VP hopeful in charge of the proceedings - on the grounds that the action was politically motivated.

In round one of the battle to keep a lid on Palin's alleged wrongdoing, the Republican camp was dealt a fatal blow.

Superior Court Judge Peter Michalski dismissed the lawsuit without any qualms.

In his legal opinion, the Legislature was within its jurisdiction to pursue the issues and had the authority to likewise investigate the circumstances surrounding the firing of a public officer on dubious grounds.

The rag-tag band of Palin supporters - which consisted of five Republican lawmakers and one legislator - were quick on the uptake.

Without skipping a beat, a petition was filed in the Alaska Supreme Court, asking for an expedited appeal.

The court, finding merit to the arguments, set an oral hearing for Wednesday next in Anchorage, Alaska.

Defense attorney, Peter Maassen, essentially scoffed at the last-ditch effort by Palin's camp to head them off at the pass.

After all, the investigation will be completed by Thursday.

"There is no need for an appeal," he noted for the record.

He was quick to add that at "no time" in history has a court ever suppressed the outcome of a legislative investigation."

He's forgetting one thing.

Just because it hasn't happened before - doesn't mean by any stretch of the imagination - that it can't happen in the future.

History is not static.

Daily events shape it, after all.

Los Angeles Police Department...violates rights and engages in warrantless searches! Police State "pigs"...

Early this morning, a friend of mine went for a walk around 5:10 a.m. to get some fresh air and pick up a morning paper, when he was accosted by a police officer and subjected to abuse.

The friend was on his way down the street when the officer in question cruised by, spied him, then proceeded to halt his squad car and bark out a question from the open window.

"What are you doing?"

"Getting some fresh air," my friend responded politely.

I guess that was not good enough for officer.

God forbid, a citizen should be under the false impression that they are entitled to stroll down a city street at dawn, and exercise their constitutional right to enjoy a bit of nature along the way!

At this juncture - the officer jumped out of his vehicle, strode up to my friend - and proceeded to drag him over to the police car.

"Is anything wrong?" my friend asked, who was quite distressed now by the turn of the events going down.

Before the cop had the opportunity to reply, a description of a suspect squawked over the radio of the squad car.

It was evident now that the pig-headed officer was apprehending the wrong person!

"Obviously, that is not me," the middle-aged man protested.

Without skipping a beat, the cocky cop replied,

"But, you do look familiar. Do you have a two-hundred pound parrot?"

What kind of a sick joke was that?

At the car, the officer twirled my friend around towards the vehicle.

Then, he yanked his arms and hands behind his back, without warning.

"What are you doing?" my friend asked (somewhat alarmed now) as the officer proceeded to empty his pockets and toss the contents onto the hood of the vehicle with little regard or respect for his personal belongings.

When the cavalier cop noticed my friend's car keys, he asked where the vehicle was parked.

Then, the officer proceeded to enter the SUV, and conduct a warrantless search, as my friend sat in the back seat of the police car in a state of shock.

A few minutes later, the officer returned from his wild illegal activities, and gruffly advised the law-abiding citizen that he could collect up his "things" and go.

Throughout the rogue encounter, the officer kept his identity secret, and gave no explanation as to why the resident was stopped.

My friend wanted to ask the officer for his name and badge number (since it was not in plain sight) - but was concerned that if he took that action - it might tip off the cop that he intended to file a complaint with the Police Commission.

Afraid that the officer might plant drugs on his person or in his car to retaliate, my friend was forced to struggle through the ordeal as peaceably as possible, until the wacko officer let him go.

In this instant case, it should be noted that my friend has a serious medical condition, which is aggravated by stress and anxiety.

During the course of the wrongful interruption of his "liberty", he - in fact - experienced sharp pains at the base of his spine and the crown of his head which indicated his normally high blood pressure must have literally gone through the roof.

It is wholly conceivable that the disturbing unjust action taken by the officer, could have easily triggered a stroke or a heart attack, in view of the circumstances.

In sum, the wrongful acts of the officer were not only abusive, but constituted a gross violation of rights.

Understandably, my friend intends to locate an attorney in the near future, to bring legal action against the appropriate Law Enforcement Agency.

A civilized society should never tolerate the reprehensible acts of those who would wear the "shield" - and under the color of authority - abuse their power and privilege in a bold-faced mean-spirited effort to demean a citizen unjustly.

The officer's perverse and deliberate refusal to obey the upright - "law of the land" - was wrongful, despicable, and in violation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

For this reason, the officer should be punished within the full extent of the law, and held accountable for his heinous acts which are a disgrace to law enforcement.

CineVegas Festival...Scandal! Festival goers complain Greenspuns locked out all but close friends to Murakami event!

Greenspun's pull boner on Festival Circuit...


The Murakami event slated to premiere at a "blow-out bash" at the CineVegas Film Festival - was being billed as a landmark "Art Happening" for the Festival this year - and a major coup for the Las Vegas local art scene.

However, during the course of the Las Vegas Fest there was a stink in the air; after all, it was quite evident to any fool that the Greenspuns (Mr. Greenspun is the President of CineVegas) had been up to no good.

When a member of the press and a "Royal Flush Pass" patron showed up at the CineVegas soiree at the Wynn for the Murakami "exhibition", they were summarily snubbed for no good reason.

The journalist was not permitted to enter the exhibit in spite of the fact he had a ticket in tow.

And - a "Royal Flush Pass" patron - who is supposed to be granted access to all events throughout the course of the Festival (which one pays through the nose for) was left to gaze from a distance through a glass window upstairs.

Here is how the disgruntled patron described the occasion:

"Tonight was a trip...I was with an invited member of the press..and we went to the Murakami short at the Wynn.
He was not allowed in..to see the event..and I was only allowed to view it from the second floor through the glass...no sound..no viewing.
It was another CineVegas ripoff...for me. I am pissed...yesterday I was just miffed..they embarrassed me to the T...tonight.....this royal flush pass should be flushed.
Tonight was really a private event for Greenspans and their 100 closest friends...you could not buy a ticket to it...you could not get in with a ticket. Don't ask...and be prepared to be treated like shit..we were.
The screening was a Propaganda film...tell you about that tomorrow. Can you tell I am not happy?."

I also had a bad experience with the press staff over the Murakami event which was reported in a prior post.

On the surface, the Greenspuns give the impression that they are open, caring, giving individuals.

However, quite the opposite appears to be true.

The Festival is used to promote themselves, their business, and exhalt their name in the community.

Patronage and philanthropy is one thing.

But, abuse of power - at the expense of others - is shocking, disturbing, and a menace to the public at large.

Shame on Amy and Robin Greenspun for their greedy grip on the Murakami "unveiling" - which ultimately - ruined the credibility and stature of Cinevegas on the Festival Circuit.

To many film buffs around the Nation, their disgraceful conduct amounted to uncalled-for elitism.

Dan Rather once said:

"An intellectual snob is someone who can listen to the William Tell Overture and not think of the Lone Ranger."